Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07293

Introduced
3/16/17  
Introduced
3/16/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Report Pass
3/24/17  
Refer
4/6/17  
Report Pass
4/12/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning Regional Consolidation Efforts And Municipalities.

Impact

The impacts of HB 07293 on state law are notable, as it amends existing statutes related to collective bargaining. Specifically, it clarifies that the issues surrounding voluntary regional consolidation efforts are not considered collective bargaining subjects that would impair a municipality's right to enter into such agreements. This change is expected to streamline the process through which municipalities can cooperate more effectively while ensuring that critical services are maintained or enhanced through shared efforts.

Summary

House Bill 07293, titled 'An Act Concerning Regional Consolidation Efforts And Municipalities', was introduced to facilitate regional collaboration among municipalities in the state. The bill allows towns, cities, and boroughs to form public service districts, aimed at consolidating resources and enhancing service delivery across communities. This legislation intends to empower local governments by giving them the authority to unite for better operational efficiency, thus potentially lowering costs and improving public services like public health, public safety, and municipal code enforcement. It represents a significant policy shift focusing on collaborative governance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 07293 appears to be largely supportive among proponents who view it as a progressive step towards efficient municipal operations. Advocates argue that by enabling shared services, municipalities can address fiscal challenges while meeting community needs more effectively. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders regarding the potential implications for labor rights and the nature of public service employment. Critics suggest that excluding consolidation efforts from collective bargaining discussions could undermine workers' rights and diminish their representation in important negotiations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential impact on collective bargaining agreements, which some opponents fear could weaken the negotiating power of employees within municipalities. The ability of municipalities to withdraw from public service districts after a specified period could raise concerns about member commitment and service continuity. The balance between local autonomy and state oversight continues to be a critical discussion point, as some believe that greater consolidation could lead to loss of local control.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2517

Water: irrigation districts: long-term maintenance agreements.

TX SB1301

Relating to limited-purpose annexation under strategic partnership agreements for certain districts.

TX SB1662

Relating to limited-purpose annexation under strategic partnership agreements for certain districts.

IA SF2021

A bill for an act relating to funding calculations for the teacher salary supplement, professional development supplement, early intervention supplement, and teacher leadership supplement for school districts that materially breach an interscholastic sharing agreement, and including effective date and applicability provisions.

CA SB1251

Mosquito abatement inspections.

TX SB1658

Relating to limited-purpose annexation under strategic partnership agreements for certain districts.

CA SB330

Los Angeles Community College District Affordable Housing Pilot Program.

CA AB3086

Interdistrict attendance: prohibition on transfers by a school district of residence.