Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1662

Caption

Relating to limited-purpose annexation under strategic partnership agreements for certain districts.

Impact

The proposed changes will grant municipalities a clearer framework for negotiating annexation agreements with districts, particularly in counties with large populations. It establishes that a limited-purpose annexation agreement must have a defined term of no more than six years, after which voters will have the opportunity to vote on an extension of the agreement. This could potentially streamline the annexation process, making it more predictable for both municipalities and districts, while also ensuring community involvement through public voting.

Summary

Senate Bill 1662 aims to amend the Local Government Code specifically around the provisions for limited-purpose annexation under strategic partnership agreements between municipalities and specific districts. The bill introduces new sub-sections that outline the conditions and procedures under which municipalities can enter into these agreements, ensuring that any annexation for limited purposes adheres to a structured process where voter approval is mandatory. This entails that a majority vote from district residents is needed before any agreement can take effect.

Conclusion

If enacted, SB 1662 will significantly affect how municipalities in Texas approach limited-purpose annexation, fostering an environment of collaboration and mutual consent between local governments and districts. It aims to balance the need for municipal governance with the rights of district residents, ensuring that local voices are heard throughout the annexation process.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding SB 1662 is the requirement for public hearings before adopting any agreement as well as the necessity for voter approval. While proponents argue that these measures enhance democratic participation and local governance, opponents may express concerns about the potential for these processes to delay urgent annexation needs or complicate agreements. Additionally, the bill repeals certain existing provisions which may lead to debates about the implications for previously established agreements between municipalities and districts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2891

High school and community college dual enrollment: College and Career Access Pathways partnerships: charter schools.

CA SB1244

Pupil instruction: dual enrollment: College and Career Access Pathways partnerships.

CA AB30

Community colleges: College and Career Access Pathways partnerships.

CA SB586

College and Career Access Pathways partnerships.

CA AB2575

High school and community college dual enrollment: College and Career Access Pathways partnerships: private schools.

CA AB2871

Public schools: College and Career Access Pathways partnerships.

CA AB102

Pupil attendance at community colleges: College and Career Access Pathways partnerships: county offices of education.

CA AB359

Pupil instruction: dual enrollment: College and Career Access Pathways partnerships.