Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07319

Introduced
4/12/17  
Introduced
4/12/17  
Refer
4/12/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning A Request For Proposals For A Casino Gaming Facility In The State.

Impact

Once enacted, this bill could significantly reshape the state’s economic landscape. The estimated 35% gross gaming revenue share paid to the state from the casino operations could create substantial new revenue streams for Connecticut. This revenue could be earmarked for various public services, enhancing educational funding, infrastructure improvements, or healthcare resources. Furthermore, the development of a casino may lead to increased tourism, drawing visitors from neighboring states, and potentially benefiting local businesses in the vicinity.

Summary

House Bill 07319 outlines a framework for establishing a new casino gaming facility in the state of Connecticut. The bill mandates the Commissioners of Consumer Protection and Economic and Community Development to develop a request for proposals (RFP) for potential developers of such a facility. It requires that proposed responders present comprehensive plans detailing the economic and social impacts of the casino, including job creation, community engagement, and mitigation of public health risks associated with gambling. The bill also emphasizes the need for substantial financial backing, mandating a minimum investment of $500 million and a $50 million nonrefundable licensing fee.

Contention

However, the introduction of HB 07319 has raised concerns from various stakeholders. Critics argue that the potential negative social implications of introducing a new casino could outweigh the economic benefits, such as increased gambling addiction or community disruption. Additionally, local governments and residents may contest the conditions under which a casino could be built, particularly regarding the referendum process required for municipal approval and the potential strain on local infrastructure and public services. The decision-making power held by state agencies versus local governance is also a point of contention in the discussions surrounding the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1231

Health information exchange: demonstration projects.

CA AB3059

Go Zone demonstration programs.

NJ A651

Permits demonstration county to terminate its participation in the "Real Property Assessment Demonstration Program."

NJ A621

Permits demonstration county to terminate its participation in the "Real Property Assessment Demonstration Program."

CA AB1992

Carbon sequestration: blue carbon and teal carbon demonstration projects.

TX HB2893

Relating to the technology demonstration sites project and to a computer lending pilot program.

IL HB0004

UNIVERSAL CHILD CARE PROGRAM

NJ A4073

Establishes three-year Medicaid demonstration project to pay for certain drugs according to value-based system.