Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00611

Introduced
1/24/17  
Introduced
1/24/17  
Refer
1/24/17  
Refer
2/24/17  
Report Pass
3/2/17  
Report Pass
3/2/17  
Refer
3/10/17  
Refer
3/10/17  
Report Pass
3/16/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Charging Of Unemployment Compensation Benefits To Employers.

Impact

The bill, upon enactment, will overhaul certain provisions of Connecticut's unemployment compensation laws, particularly regarding employer liabilities. By introducing new criteria for how and when unemployment benefits are charged to employers, the bill aims to alleviate some of the financial burdens that can discourage companies from hiring or retaining employees. Key changes include stipulations for wage payments in lieu of notice, benefit exclusions in the event of natural disasters, and protections for employers who continue to employ claimants during the benefits calculation period. This could potentially lead to more stable employment situations in the state.

Summary

SB00611, titled 'An Act Concerning The Charging Of Unemployment Compensation Benefits To Employers', seeks to amend the existing unemployment compensation framework in the state. The bill primarily focuses on modifying how unemployment benefits are charged to employers, with provisions that can affect both the financial liability of employers and the availability of benefits for employees. The proposed changes intend to enhance the existing regulations surrounding unemployment compensation to ensure a more equitable distribution of benefits while encouraging employers to retain their workers even in times of economic hardship.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB00611 appears to be supportive, particularly among labor advocates and those concerned with employment stability. Proponents argue that the amendments will not only provide necessary relief to employers during challenging times but will also protect employees who might otherwise find themselves without support. However, there may be critics who question whether the changes adequately address the needs of all workers and whether the financial risk to employers is being sufficiently mitigated.

Contention

Notably, the primary contention surrounding SB00611 includes the balance between encouraging employer responsibility and ensuring employee welfare. While the bill holds promise for changing the dynamics of unemployment benefits positively, concerns exist about its potential to create loopholes that could be exploited by employers, resulting in inadequate support for employees during unemployment. Stakeholders in the labor sector will need to pay close attention to how these amendments are implemented and whether they yield the intended benefits for both workers and businesses alike.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB402

Office of the Claimant Advocate and Stakeholder Advisory Group.

CA SB1384

Labor Commissioner: financially disabled persons: representation.

AZ HB2813

Erroneous convictions; compensation

CA AB401

Employment Development Department: language translations.

CA SB490

Victim compensation.

CA SB530

Exoneration: compensation.

CA SB975

Debt: coerced debts.

CA SB446

Factual innocence.