Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00726

Introduced
1/25/17  
Refer
1/25/17  
Refer
3/14/17  
Report Pass
4/3/17  
Refer
4/13/17  
Refer
4/13/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Engrossed
5/3/17  
Report Pass
5/5/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning Crime Victim Compensation For Victims Of Sexual Assault And Restitution From Persons Committing Criminal Acts.

Impact

The bill's passage is expected to enhance the rights and protections afforded to sexual assault victims in the state. By eliminating the requirement to report the crime promptly, it addresses the psychological barriers that often prevent victims from seeking justice. Furthermore, the bill streamlines the application process for those who have experienced emotional or psychological trauma, allowing them avenues to recover compensation that were previously unavailable. This has the potential to increase the number of claims processed and aid in the financial recovery of many victims.

Summary

SB00726, titled An Act Concerning Crime Victim Compensation For Victims Of Sexual Assault And Restitution From Persons Committing Criminal Acts, introduces significant amendments to the laws governing victim compensation in cases of sexual assault. The bill allows victims to receive compensation regardless of whether they reported the assault to the police within the stipulated timeframe if they sought medical attention within 72 hours. This provision aims to support victims who may not feel comfortable or safe reporting immediately, thus broadening the scope of eligibility for victim compensation.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB00726 appears to be positive, particularly among advocacy groups championing victims' rights. Proponents argue that it represents a compassionate approach toward victims and acknowledges the complexities of trauma. Supporters see the bill as a progressive step in victim advocacy, essential for promoting healing and justice. However, some concerns have been raised about the potential for misuse of the compensation framework, emphasizing the need for safeguards to prevent fraudulent claims while still providing necessary support for genuine victims.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns regarding the balance between extending victim rights and ensuring that the compensation system does not become susceptible to exploitation. Additionally, some lawmakers expressed apprehensions about the fiscal implications of expanding compensation eligibility and the long-term sustainability of the fund from which these compensations are drawn. The discussions highlighted an underlying tension between providing support for victims and maintaining systemic integrity within the compensation process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1200

Enforcement of judgments: renewal and interest.

AZ HB2297

Judgments; liens; homestead exemption

KY HB801

AN ACT relating to Canadian money judgments.

CA AB1119

Enforcement of judgments.

CA AB905

Money judgments of other jurisdictions.

CA SB642

Civil actions: renewal of judgments.

VA HB1234

Judgments; limitations on enforcement, extensions and renewals.

CA SB355

Judgment debtor employers: Employment Development Department.