Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00839

Introduced
2/16/17  
Refer
2/16/17  
Refer
2/16/17  
Report Pass
3/10/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Engrossed
4/19/17  
Engrossed
4/19/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Chaptered
5/23/17  
Enrolled
5/24/17  
Enrolled
5/24/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Department Of Developmental Services' Recommendations Regarding Revisions To Its Statutes And References To Intellectual Disability.

Impact

The legislative changes embodied in SB00839 are intended to enhance the governance and oversight of the DDS, aiming to streamline the statutory framework governing services for individuals with intellectual disabilities. The bill also introduces provisions for regular meetings of the council, thereby ensuring ongoing oversight and input from stakeholders over time. The effectiveness of these changes is expected to improve service delivery and minimize discrepancies in how services are administered across different regions.

Summary

SB00839, titled 'An Act Concerning The Department Of Developmental Services' Recommendations Regarding Revisions To Its Statutes And References To Intellectual Disability', aims to amend existing statutes related to the Department of Developmental Services (DDS) in Connecticut. The bill proposes the establishment and restructuring of a Council on Developmental Services, which will include diverse members, such as those with intellectual disabilities or their guardians, to ensure representation in decision-making processes regarding developmental services.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB00839 appears to be supportive, highlighting an essential recognition of the need for reform in the management of developmental services. However, there may be contention regarding the specifics of representation and the operational mechanisms of the council, as balancing varied interests is critical for effective governance. Discussions surrounding bills like this often reveal a commitment to advocacy for marginalized populations, while also underscoring the complexities of legislative processes.

Contention

Notably, the debate on SB00839 may center around who is represented on the council and how their voices will influence DDS policies. Potential contention points could include the adequacy of the proposed appointments and whether they truly reflect the needs of individuals with intellectual disabilities. Moreover, as the bill includes provisions for auditing processes, questions might arise regarding the fairness and effectiveness of these audits in maintaining service quality and compliance with state and federal regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA HB328

Provides relative to sentencing of a person with severe mental illness

CA AB2512

Death penalty: person with an intellectual disability.

CA SB1001

Death penalty: intellectually disabled persons.

AZ HB2229

Health care institutions; education; abuse

CA AB2535

Department of Parks and Recreation: grants: playgrounds and play structures: disability access.

CA AB1147

Disability Equity, Transparency, and Accountability Act of 2024.

LA HB458

Provides relative to the execution of agreements between merchants and third-party delivery services

CA AB231

Worker classification: employees and independent contractors: licensed manicurists.