Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00885

Introduced
2/22/17  
Introduced
2/22/17  
Refer
2/22/17  
Refer
2/22/17  
Report Pass
4/7/17  
Report Pass
4/7/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Report Pass
4/25/17  
Report Pass
4/25/17  
Engrossed
6/2/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning Recovery Of Payments From Collateral Sources By A Municipality With A Self-insured Health Plan.

Impact

The passage of SB00885 would alter the statutory landscape governing the interplay between municipalities and self-insured health plans. By permitting municipalities to recover payments for collateral sources concerning personal injuries, the bill aims to ensure that municipalities can mitigate financial burdens incurred from health care claims. This change will substantively affect how municipalities manage their self-insured health plans, potentially leading to higher accountability in payment recovery practices and maximizing the utilization of available funds for healthcare provision.

Summary

SB00885, titled 'An Act Concerning Recovery of Payments from Collateral Sources by a Municipality with a Self-Insured Health Plan', proposes a significant amendment to existing legislation regarding the recovery of collateral source payments in personal injury and wrongful death claims. Specifically, the bill allows municipalities that have self-insured health plans to recover payments from collateral sources, which contrasts with the general prohibition against such recovery by insurers or other payers. This plan is especially relevant for municipalities seeking compensation for medical costs associated with claims for damages, emphasizing the need for self-insured entities to maintain sustainability in healthcare funding.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB00885 appears to lean towards support from local government entities and proponents of self-insurance models. Advocates argue that the bill is necessary for enabling municipalities to secure necessary funds without relying entirely on state or federal programs. However, concerns may arise regarding the implications for residents and claimants who could face increased costs or complications in their claims processes. The debate possibly revolves around balancing municipal interests with the rights of individuals claiming damages.

Contention

The primary contention surrounding SB00885 rests on the implications of allowing municipalities to recover payments from collateral sources. Critics may argue that this provision could lead to reduced benefits or increased premiums for individuals seeking recovery in personal injury cases, as municipalities might aim to recoup their costs through various means. Conversely, supporters assert that this recovery mechanism is essential for the financial health of municipal health plans, ensuring that there is sufficient funding for health services for the community. The underlying conflict highlights the broader tensions between municipal financial management and individual rights in the healthcare and legal spheres.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.