Connecticut Senate Bill SB00922

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/24/17
• Refer: 2/24/17
• Report Pass: 3/24/17
• Refer: 4/5/17
• Report Pass: 4/11/17
• Engrossed: 5/17/17
• Report Pass: 5/19/17
• Chaptered: 6/19/17
• Enrolled: 6/22/17
• Passed: 7/6/17

Caption

An Act Concerning Temporary Health Care Structures.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts local zoning laws by permitting temporary healthcare structures as accessory uses, which were previously more restricted. With this act, municipalities must process permit applications for these structures within a specified timeframe and cannot unjustly deny permits if compliance is demonstrated. This change is expected to provide families with more options for home-based care solutions, reflecting a growing recognition of the need for flexible living arrangements for individuals with health challenges.

Summary

Senate Bill 00922, known as the 'Act Concerning Temporary Health Care Structures', aims to facilitate the installation of temporary healthcare structures for mentally or physically impaired individuals on residential properties. This legislation allows caregivers to provide necessary care within a structure that is approved through a municipal permitting process. The bill defines a 'temporary health care structure' as a compact transportable structure, limited to 500 square feet, designed to accommodate a single occupant and conforming to safety codes. The eligibility for such installations is restricted to lots zoned for single-family residences, ensuring compatibility with neighborhood regulations.

Sentiment

The response to SB00922 has been largely positive among advocacy groups focusing on disability rights and family caregivers. Supporters argue that it supports the autonomy and dignity of individuals requiring care while remaining in familiar environments. However, there are concerns among some local officials regarding the potential impact on neighborhood dynamics and property values, as the bill removes some of the traditional checks that municipalities have over residential zoning. Overall, the sentiment aligns more with the need for compassionate care and accommodation.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill relate to the balance of local authority and state mandates. While municipalities retain some control through the permitting process, they may opt out of the provisions entirely after public hearings and justified decisions. Critics of the bill caution that this could lead to inconsistencies in how different municipalities handle the installations, potentially creating a patchwork of regulations that could confuse caregivers and affect the availability of such structures.