Connecticut Senate Bill SB00189

Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/22/18
• Refer: 2/22/18
• Report Pass: 3/15/18
• Refer: 3/23/18
• Report Pass: 3/29/18

Caption

An Act Concerning The Placement Of Children Committed To The Custody Of The Commissioner Of Children And Families.

Impact

By establishing protocols for the placement of children, SB00189 has the potential to improve the outcomes for children in state custody. The bill emphasizes the need for the commissioner to give priority to placements with grandparents or relatives, which may contribute positively to the children's stability and emotional wellbeing. Additionally, the bill mandates that reasonable efforts to keep children with their parents must be assessed before their custody is committed to the state, aiming to protect family unity whenever possible.

Summary

SB00189, also known as An Act Concerning The Placement Of Children Committed To The Custody Of The Commissioner Of Children And Families, addresses the process for placing children who have been committed to the custody of the State's children and families authority. The bill modifies existing statutes concerning the guardianship of children in custody, outlining the responsibilities of the commissioner and the priority placement for children with relatives, particularly grandparents. The act aims to enhance the welfare of children by ensuring careful consideration in their placement to foster familial connections.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB00189 appears to be positive, particularly among advocates for children's rights and welfare. There is recognition that prioritizing familial placements and maintaining connections with relatives can be crucial in supporting the emotional and developmental needs of children in foster care. However, there may also be concern among some stakeholders regarding the adequacy of resources and support for families to ensure safe and appropriate placements.

Contention

While the bill has received support for its focus on family placement, discussions may arise regarding the practical implementation of these placements. Challenges such as resource availability, the capacity of relatives to care for the children, and the systemic support for navigating these placements might present points of contention. Moreover, balancing the need for familial ties with the best interests of the child can lead to debates about what constitutes 'reasonable efforts' in retaining children within their biological families.