Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05051

Introduced
1/9/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Award Of Alimony In A Family Relations Matter.

Impact

The implications of this bill are significant, as they impose stricter guidelines on judges when determining alimony and property division outcomes. This ensures a more equitable financial assessment for both parties in a divorce, potentially alleviating disparities that could arise from ignoring income and tax consequences. By formalizing considerations of income and tax implications, the bill aims to provide a clearer framework within family law that can benefit both the payor and recipient of alimony. Additionally, the revised burden of proof in specific scenarios, such as retirement or cohabitation, seeks to stabilize alimony obligations as life circumstances change.

Summary

House Bill 05051 seeks to amend the regulations surrounding alimony in family relations matters within the state. It proposes that courts must take into account various financial aspects when determining alimony awards and property assignments during divorce proceedings. Key stipulations include mandatory consideration of the tax implications of alimony orders and a thorough assessment of both parties' gross and net incomes, allowing courts to make more informed decisions regarding financial support post-divorce. Furthermore, the bill aims to ensure that financial terms outlined in a legal separation decree remain effective when a marriage is formally dissolved, unless deemed unconscionable.

Contention

While HB 05051 may appear to offer fairer outcomes for alimony recipients, there may be contention from those who argue that the bill complicates the decision-making process for judges and could create undue burden for the paying parties. The changes to the burden of proof particularly may spark debate, as they introduce new challenges and legal standards in determining the continuation or modification of alimony payments. Thus, stakeholders within the legal community, including family law practitioners, judges, and advocacy groups, may have differing opinions on the practicality and fairness of these proposed amendments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.