Connecticut House Bill HB06346

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/19
• Refer: 1/25/19
• Refer: 3/13/19
• Report Pass: 3/21/19
• Refer: 4/1/19
• Report Pass: 4/8/19
• Engrossed: 5/16/19
• Report Pass: 5/20/19
• Chaptered: 6/20/19
• Enrolled: 6/24/19
• Passed: 6/28/19

Caption

An Act Concerning The Review Of Municipal Arbitration Awards.

Impact

The bill impacts the statutes related to municipal arbitration significantly by granting municipalities greater authority to reject arbitration awards that they consider unfavorable. This modification is expected to influence labor relations and negotiations within the municipalities, particularly in how disputes between municipal employees and employers are resolved. The new provision allows a more direct influence on arbitration outcomes, which could lead to shifts in collective bargaining practices in the municipal sector. As a result, it may affect employee relations and the dynamics of public sector negotiations.

Summary

House Bill No. 6346, also known as an Act Concerning The Review Of Municipal Arbitration Awards, aims to amend the existing regulations surrounding the review of arbitration awards made in the context of municipal employer-employee disputes. The primary change proposed by this bill is to provide the legislative body of a municipal employer the authority to reject an arbitration award through a two-thirds majority vote. This power must be exercised within a specific timeframe of twenty-five days from the receipt of the award. If this deadline falls on a weekend or holiday, it is extended to the next business day. This change intends to enhance local governance and provide municipalities with more control over arbitration outcomes affecting their workforce and budget considerations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6346 appears to be supportive among municipal employers who desire more control over arbitration processes and outcomes. Proponents argue that the bill will allow municipalities to make decisions that better reflect their financial realities and operational needs. However, there may be concerns among labor advocates and public employee unions who view this shift as potentially undermining workers' rights and protections under existing arbitration rules, leading to a divided perspective on its overall merits.

Contention

Notable contention surrounding HB 6346 revolves around the balance of power between municipal employers and employees. Critics argue that by allowing municipalities to have the final say in arbitration decisions, the bill could weaken the bargaining position of employees represented by unions, potentially leading to negative consequences in labor relations. There are concerns that this could create an environment where the interests of employees are not adequately safeguarded, thus fostering disputes over interpretations of fairness in the arbitration process and limiting the effectiveness of collective bargaining agreements.