Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06566

Introduced
1/28/19  
Refer
1/28/19  
Refer
1/28/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Report Pass
3/29/19  
Refer
4/11/19  
Refer
4/11/19  
Report Pass
4/17/19  

Caption

An Act Prohibiting Municipal Employees From Serving On Certain Municipal Legislative Bodies.

Impact

If passed, this bill would amend existing laws to reinforce the principle that municipal employees should not be in a position to influence decisions in bodies where they hold supervision or influence over the employee's actions. This could lead to increased scrutiny of appointments within municipal boards, particularly in areas such as zoning, land use, and planning, where potential conflicts could arise due to overlapping responsibilities.

Summary

House Bill 06566 aims to restrict municipal employees from serving on certain municipal legislative bodies that directly supervise them, effectively amending subsection (e) of section 7-421 of the general statutes. The bill permits employees to serve on the governmental bodies of their municipality, unless the body is responsible for the direct supervision of the employee. This legislation reflects an effort to minimize potential conflicts of interest and ensure clear boundaries between supervisory and legislative functions within local governments.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 06566 appears to be generally supportive among legislators seeking to promote transparency and ethical conduct in local governance, although there are concerns from some municipal employees and advocates about the implications of further restricting their ability to engage in local political processes. Supporters view it as a necessary reform to prevent conflicts of interest, while critics fear it may limit representation and involvement in local governance by experienced individuals who are currently employed by the municipality.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention is whether the bill could inadvertently limit the pool of candidates eligible to serve on key municipal bodies, especially in smaller municipalities. Critics argue that this could lead to less experienced or qualified individuals filling these roles, thereby reducing the effectiveness of local governance. The discourse around the bill highlights a tension between maintaining ethical standards and ensuring adequate representation and expertise in local legislative processes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1081

After School Education and Safety Program: funding: authorized purposes.

CA AB1051

Education finance: state special schools and diagnostic centers.

CA SB1203

School safety: lockdown training.

CA AB2434

County government: allocation of state funds.

CA SB527

Education finance: local control funding formula: home-to-school transportation: cost-of-living adjustment.

CA AB898

Criminal records: automatic conviction record relief.

NJ S1199

Creates new $100 assessment for convictions of certain sexual offenses to fund counseling for victims and their families; establishes Sexual Offender Victim Counseling Fund.

CA AB1391

Education finance: transitional kindergarten: funding for basic aid school districts and necessary small schools.