Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06666

Introduced
1/29/19  
Refer
1/29/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Report Pass
3/29/19  
Report Pass
3/29/19  
Refer
4/5/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Engrossed
4/24/19  
Report Pass
4/25/19  
Chaptered
6/24/19  
Chaptered
6/24/19  
Enrolled
6/27/19  
Passed
7/12/19  

Caption

An Act Requiring The Prompt Payment Of Contractors.

Impact

The enactment of HB 06666 may significantly affect state laws governing payment practices in the construction sector. By establishing a stricter timeline for payments, the bill seeks to create a more sustainable and equitable business environment for small contractors. Veterans of the industry believe that timely payments can enhance project efficiency and contractor satisfaction, while also addressing issues of delayed compensation that can lead to bankruptcies and stalled projects in the construction field.

Summary

House Bill 06666, titled 'An Act Requiring The Prompt Payment Of Contractors', aims to enhance the timeliness of payments to small contractors and subcontractors involved in construction projects. The bill amends existing statutory provisions to reduce the timeframe for payments from thirty days to twenty-five days for both contractors and subcontractors. This change is intended to ensure that parties involved in construction contracts are compensated promptly, thereby improving cash flow within the construction industry and mitigating potential financial hardships faced by smaller firms.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 06666 appears to be positive among proponents, especially those advocating for the rights and financial stability of small contractors. Supporters argue that a more enforceable timeline for payments is a necessary measure to protect these contractors from cash flow problems. Conversely, there may be concerns among some larger firms about the implications of this legislation on their financial operations and contract negotiations, though these sentiments are not as prominently featured in discussions.

Contention

While the bill is largely supported, there could be notable points of contention regarding its enforcement and the implications for larger general contractors who contract with multiple subcontractors. Some stakeholders may raise concerns about ensuring compliance with the new provisions and the potential for disputes or complications arising from the shortened payment window. The challenge will be to balance the push for prompt payments while maintaining fairness in contractual relationships across diverse stakeholders in the construction industry.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.