Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06672

Introduced
1/29/19  
Introduced
1/29/19  
Refer
1/29/19  
Refer
1/29/19  
Refer
3/27/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning Voting For Municipal Officers And On Local Questions.

Impact

If enacted, HB 06672 would permit local governments to adapt voter participation standards in ways that reflect their communities' unique demographics. Prior to this bill, underage individuals were unable to vote in municipal elections, hence this change could lead to a greater representation of youth perspectives on local issues. Further, it may inspire further discussions about voting age and civic engagement, extending to state and federal elections in the future.

Summary

House Bill 06672 seeks to amend the voting laws in Connecticut by allowing municipalities to permit residents as young as sixteen years old to participate in elections for local officers and vote on local questions. This represents a significant change in the voter age policy, targeting a demographic often excluded from the electoral process at the municipal level. By introducing this measure, the bill aims to engage younger citizens in political and civic matters, potentially fostering a stronger sense of community and responsibility among the youth.

Sentiment

The sentiment around the bill appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that allowing sixteen-year-olds to vote will empower young people and acknowledge their capacity to contribute to local governance. They see this as a progressive step toward inclusivity in the electoral process. Conversely, opponents raise concerns about the maturity and decision-making capabilities of individuals in this age group, questioning whether they are adequately informed to make such significant civic choices.

Contention

A notable point of contention centers around the implications of lowering the voting age in municipal elections. Proponents of the bill maintain that early exposure to voting process encourages lifelong engagement, while critics worry about potential voter manipulation by parties aiming to influence less informed youth. This debate points to broader societal conversations about responsibility, civic education, and the ways in which young people engage with democratic processes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB997

Local control and accountability plans: parent advisory committee: student advisory committee.

CA AB3140

School districts: reorganization.

CA SB644

Political Reform Act of 1974: contribution limits.

CA AB1253

Education finance: school bonds: citizens’ oversight committees.

CA SB342

South Coast Air Quality Management District: board membership.

CA SB1057

Elementary and secondary education: omnibus bill.

CA SB1405

Community service districts: Lake Arrowhead Community Service District: covenants, conditions, and restrictions: enforcement.

CA AB967

Local control and accountability plans.