Connecticut House Bill HB06762

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/29/19
• Refer: 1/29/19

Caption

An Act Concerning The Personal Assets Of Physicians And Advanced Practice Registered Nurses In Malpractice Actions.

Impact

The introduction of HB 6762 reflects an ongoing concern within the medical community regarding the financial burdens that can result from malpractice claims. By ensuring that personal assets are protected, the bill is designed to foster a safer and more secure working environment for healthcare providers. This could potentially lead to an increase in the number of practitioners willing to enter or remain in the field, thereby enhancing the availability of medical care for patients. The bill's proponents argue that this protection will also promote the responsible purchase and maintenance of liability insurance among healthcare professionals.

Summary

House Bill 6762 proposes an amendment to existing statutes to safeguard the personal assets of physicians and advanced practice registered nurses in the event of medical malpractice actions. The bill stipulates that as long as these healthcare professionals maintain appropriate professional liability insurance, their personal assets cannot be seized to secure any judgment against them resulting from malpractice claims. This legislative move aims to encourage medical practitioners to operate confidently without the fear of losing their personal property due to malpractice litigation.

Contention

While the intended effects of HB 6762 may seem beneficial for healthcare providers, the bill raises significant questions regarding accountability and patient protection. Critics may argue that such protections could embolden negligent behavior among medical professionals if they feel shielded from the repercussions of malpractice. There is also concern about the implications for patients who may struggle to receive adequate compensation when faced with medical errors or malpractice under this law. The discussions surrounding the bill are likely to include debates about balancing provider protection with patient rights.