Connecticut House Bill HB06890

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/19
• Refer: 1/30/19
• Refer: 3/7/19
• Report Pass: 3/12/19
• Refer: 3/25/19
• Report Pass: 4/1/19
• Engrossed: 5/23/19
• Report Pass: 5/28/19
• Chaptered: 6/24/19
• Enrolled: 6/27/19
• Passed: 7/12/19

Caption

An Act Requiring A Study Of The United States Department Of Education's Proposed Regulations Regarding Sexual Misconduct Under Title Ix Of The Elementary And Secondary Education Act Of 1972.

Impact

If enacted, HB 06890 would have a significant impact on state laws related to higher education by ensuring that local institutions are prepared for federally mandated changes. The task force is tasked with examining how these regulations may influence safety issues related to sexual misconduct on campuses, with the expectation that their findings will help align state-level responses with federal requirements. This could lead to changes in policies and practices within educational institutions, directly affecting how cases of sexual misconduct are handled.

Summary

House Bill 06890, also known as Special Act No. 19-23, mandates the establishment of a task force designed to study the implications of proposed regulations by the U.S. Department of Education regarding sexual misconduct under Title IX as it relates to elementary and secondary education. This bill takes effect upon the issuance of the Final Rule from the Department of Education, demonstrating a proactive approach to understanding and preparing for changes that may affect campus safety and student well-being in higher education institutions across the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 06890 appears to be supportive, particularly among legislators and advocates focused on education and student safety. The formation of a task force signifies a recognition of the importance of maintaining student safety standards in light of new federal regulations. However, there could be undercurrents of concern regarding the adequacy of institutional responses to sexual misconduct, with varying opinions on how best to implement such changes effectively.

Contention

Discussions around the bill may raise points of contention concerning the actual effectiveness of a task force in making substantive changes versus simply serving as an advisory body. There might also be debates on the appropriateness of federal oversight in local education matters, with some arguing that it could lead to uniformity that overlooks local contexts and needs. Ultimately, the success of the bill will be contingent on the recommendations made by the task force and how educational institutions choose to implement any necessary changes.