Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07295

Introduced
3/5/19  
Introduced
3/5/19  
Refer
3/5/19  
Refer
3/5/19  
Report Pass
3/25/19  
Report Pass
3/25/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Refer
4/8/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning Recycling Plans For Paper And Packaging And Establishing Certain Municipal Solid Waste Management Goals.

Impact

The bill significantly alters existing statutes related to waste management and recycling by instituting new requirements for producers in the state. Municipalities are charged with making provisions for the effective separation, collection, and recycling of solid waste as outlined in the state's solid waste management plan. The goal to recycle a specific percentage of solid waste and limit the amount of waste disposed of per capita indicates a shift towards stricter adherence to recycling initiatives and sustainability efforts in the state, thereby promoting a cleaner environment.

Summary

House Bill 07295 addresses the recycling of paper and packaging and establishes specific municipal solid waste management goals. It mandates producers to submit strategic plans aimed at reducing waste, increasing recycling rates, and minimizing disposal costs associated with their products by the end of 2020. The bill seeks to engage producers in waste management efforts, with provisions in place to ensure such plans do not adversely affect the economic viability of waste haulers and recycling businesses. The overarching goal is to enhance the recyclability of packaging and paper products while promoting environmentally responsible practices across municipalities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 07295 is largely supportive among environmental advocates and policymakers who view it as a necessary legislative measure to combat waste pollution. Supporters argue that proactive measures in recycling can lead to long-term economic and ecological benefits. However, there is concern regarding the feasibility of the expectations placed on producers and municipalities, particularly amongst smaller businesses and those with limited resources. This dichotomy between environmental responsibility and economic feasibility frames the discussions around the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from the balance between regulatory oversight and the economic impact on businesses. While advocates emphasize the importance of implementing stronger recycling initiatives, opponents indicate the risk of imposing burdensome requirements on producers, especially smaller entities that might struggle with compliance. Additionally, debates center on how effectively municipalities can meet the ambitious waste management goals set forth in the bill and whether there will be adequate resources and support from the state to achieve these targets.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SJ00007

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.

CT HJ00041

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims.

CT HJ00023

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner Extensions Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Against The State.

CT HJ00038

Resolution Concerning The Disposition Of Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.

CA AB2009

California Travel and Tourism Commission.

CA AB1920

California Travel and Tourism Commission.

CA AB2323

Insurance: covered communications.

CT HJ00029

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.