Connecticut House Bill HJ00015

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/15/19
• Refer: 1/15/19

Caption

Resolution Proposing A State Constitutional Amendment Concerning Term Limits For Legislators And Constitutional Officers.

Impact

If passed, this amendment would significantly alter the political landscape in the state by introducing restrictions on the tenure of elected officials. Currently, there are no term limits for state legislators or constitutional officers, allowing individuals to remain in office indefinitely as long as they continue to be re-elected. This constitutional change would standardize term limits across these positions and is likely to create a more dynamic political environment. The proposal may also impact the election strategies of candidates and current officeholders, as they would need to consider their potential future in politics more carefully.

Summary

HJ00015 is a proposed resolution to amend the state constitution regarding term limits for legislators and constitutional officers. The bill aims to establish a limit of four terms for both state senators and representatives, as well as for constitutional officers. The intention behind this legislation is to promote government accountability and prevent prolonged incumbency, which supporters argue can lead to stagnation and a disconnect from constituents' needs. By implementing these term limits, the bill seeks to encourage new perspectives and ideas within state governance.

Contention

The proposed term limits have prompted a variety of opinions among lawmakers and the public. Proponents argue that term limits will foster greater representation by allowing new individuals to bring diverse ideas and experiences into government, thus enhancing democratic engagement. In contrast, opponents suggest that imposing strict term limits could inadvertently remove effective lawmakers who have built valuable experience and connections that benefit their constituents. This tension between the desire for fresh leadership and the recognition of the value of experience is likely to be a focal point of debate as the bill progresses through legislative discussions.