Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00270

Introduced
1/23/19  
Introduced
1/23/19  
Refer
1/23/19  
Refer
1/23/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning Qualifying Contributions Under The Citizens' Election Program.

Impact

The enactment of SB00270 is poised to influence campaign finance laws by refining the criteria under which candidates can obtain financial support during elections. By enforcing stricter guidelines on qualifying contributions, the bill seeks to create a more robust framework for financial disclosures in electoral campaigns. The legislation is expected to reduce ambiguities surrounding qualifying contributions, potentially leading to a more informed candidate pool and enhancing the credibility of campaign financing.

Summary

SB00270, titled 'An Act Concerning Qualifying Contributions Under The Citizens' Election Program,' is designed to enhance transparency and clarity in the public financing of elections. The bill specifically mandates that the State Elections Enforcement Commission provides detailed explanations to candidates regarding why contributions are classified as non-qualifying. By delineating clear criteria and communication protocols, the bill aims to ensure that all candidates understand the requirements for receiving financial support under the Citizens' Election Program, thereby promoting fairer electoral practices.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00270 has generally been supportive among legislators advocating for election reform and integrity. Advocates argue that clearer communication from the enforcement commission will empower candidates, particularly those from smaller parties or independent backgrounds, to navigate the complexities of public financing. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the potential administrative burden that increased reporting and justification requirements might impose on the commission, which could slow down the processing of candidate applications.

Contention

While SB00270 has garnered notable support for its goals of increasing transparency, contention exists around the operational aspects of the bill. Critics fear that if the required justifications for contributions are too stringent, it could inadvertently disqualify deserving candidates, particularly from minor parties or grassroots movements, thus limiting electoral competition. The ongoing discussions highlight the tension between rigorous oversight of campaign financing and the need to foster an inclusive and diverse electoral landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.

MN HC1

A house concurrent resolution relating to the regent nomination joint committee.

AZ HB2443

Campaign finance; contributions limits