| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | 3 | LCO No. 2705 1 of 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | ||
| 5 | 5 | General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 350 | |
| 6 | 6 | January Session, 2019 | |
| 7 | 7 | LCO No. 2705 | |
| 8 | 8 | ||
| 9 | 9 | ||
| 10 | 10 | Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY | |
| 11 | 11 | ||
| 12 | 12 | ||
| 13 | 13 | Introduced by: | |
| 14 | 14 | SEN. FASANO, 34th Dist. | |
| 15 | 15 | SEN. WITKOS, 8th Dist. | |
| 16 | 16 | ||
| 17 | 17 | ||
| 18 | 18 | ||
| 19 | 19 | ||
| 20 | 20 | AN ACT PROTECTING EMPLOYERS WHO TERMINATE OR REFUSE | |
| 21 | 21 | TO HIRE AN EMPLOYEE BECAUSE OF A FAILED MARIJUANA DRUG | |
| 22 | 22 | TEST. | |
| 23 | 23 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General | |
| 24 | 24 | Assembly convened: | |
| 25 | 25 | ||
| 26 | 26 | That chapter 925 of the general statutes be amended to provide 1 | |
| 27 | 27 | protections to an employer in a civil action that in whole, or in part, is 2 | |
| 28 | 28 | attributable to the employer's decision to fire or refuse to hire an 3 | |
| 29 | 29 | employee because of a failed marijuana drug test. 4 | |
| 30 | 30 | Statement of Purpose: | |
| 31 | 31 | To insulate an employer from a civil action that is related to firing or | |
| 32 | 32 | refusing to hire an employee because of a positive marijuana test. |