Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00359 Latest Draft

Bill / Chaptered Version Filed 06/14/2019

                             
 
 
Senate Bill No. 359 
 
Public Act No. 19-69 
 
 
AN ACT EXTENDING WHI STLEBLOWER PROTECTIO NS TO 
EMPLOYEES OF BUSINES SES RECEIVING FINANC IAL 
ASSISTANCE FROM THE STATE. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General 
Assembly convened: 
 
Section 1. Section 4-61dd of the general statutes is repealed and the 
following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2019): 
(a) Any person having knowledge of any matter involving (1) 
corruption, unethical practices, violation of state laws or regulations, 
mismanagement, gross waste of funds, abuse of authority or danger to 
the public safety occurring in any state department or agency, any 
quasi-public agency, as defined in section 1-120, or any Probate Court, 
[or any person having knowledge of any matter involving] (2) 
corruption, violation of state or federal laws or regulations, gross 
waste of funds, abuse of authority or danger to the public safety 
occurring in any large state contract, or (3) corruption by an entity 
receiving financial assistance pursuant to title 32 that has failed to meet 
its contractual obligations or has failed to satisfy any condition 
regarding such financial assistance, may transmit all facts and 
information in such person's possession concerning such matter to the 
Auditors of Public Accounts. The Auditors of Public Accounts shall 
review such matter and report their findings and any  Senate Bill No. 359 
 
Public Act No. 19-69 	2 of 11 
 
recommendations to the Attorney General. Upon receiving such a 
report, the Attorney General shall make such investigation as the 
Attorney General deems proper regarding such report and any other 
information that may be reasonably derived from such report. Prior to 
conducting an investigation of any information that may be reasonably 
derived from such report, the Attorney General shall consult with the 
Auditors of Public Accounts concerning the relationship of such 
additional information to the report that has been issued pursuant to 
this subsection. Any such subsequent inves tigation deemed 
appropriate by the Attorney General shall only be conducted with the 
concurrence and assistance of the Auditors of Public Accounts. At the 
request of the Attorney General or on their own initiative, the auditors 
shall assist in the investigation. 
(b) (1) The Auditors of Public Accounts may reject any complaint 
received pursuant to subsection (a) of this section if the Auditors of 
Public Accounts determine one or more of the following: 
(A) There are other available remedies that the complainant can 
reasonably be expected to pursue; 
(B) The complaint is better suited for investigation or enforcement 
by another state agency; 
(C) The complaint is trivial, frivolous, vexatious or not made in 
good faith; 
(D) Other complaints have greater priority in terms of serving the 
public good; 
(E) The complaint is not timely or is too long delayed to justify 
further investigation; or 
(F) The complaint could be handled more appropriately as part of 
an ongoing or scheduled regular audit.  Senate Bill No. 359 
 
Public Act No. 19-69 	3 of 11 
 
(2) If the Auditors of Public Accounts reject a complaint pursuant to 
subdivision (1) of this subsection, the Auditors of Public Accounts 
shall provide a report to the Attorney General setting out the basis for 
the rejection. 
(3) If at any time the Auditors of Public Accounts determine that a 
complaint is more appropriately investigated by another state agency, 
the Auditors of Public Accounts shall refer the complaint to such 
agency. The investigating agency shall provide a status report 
regarding the referred complaint to the Auditors of Public Accounts 
upon request. 
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 12 -15, the 
Commissioner of Revenue Services may, upon written request by the 
Auditors of Public Accounts, disclose return or return information, as 
defined in section 12-15, to the Auditors of Public Accounts for 
purposes of preparing a report under subsection (a) or (b) of this 
section. Such return or return information shall not be published in 
any report prepared in accordance with subsection (a) or (b) of this 
section, and shall not otherwise be redisclosed, except that such 
information may be redisclosed to the Attorney General for purposes 
of an investigation authorized by subsection (a) of this section. Any 
person who violates the provisions of this subsection shall be subject to 
the provisions of subsection (g) of section 12-15. 
(d) The Attorney General may summon witnesses, require the 
production of any necessary books, papers or other documents and 
administer oaths to witnesses, where necessary, for the purpose of an 
investigation pursuant to this section or for the purpose of 
investigating a suspected violation of subsection (a) of section 4-275 
until such time as the Attorney General files a civil action pursuant to 
section 4-276. Service of a subpoena ad testificandum, subpoena duces 
tecum and a notice of deposition, may be made by: (1) Personal service 
or service at the usual place of abode; or (2) registered or certified mail,  Senate Bill No. 359 
 
Public Act No. 19-69 	4 of 11 
 
return receipt requested, a duly executed copy thereof addressed to the 
person to be served at such person's principal place of business in this 
state, or, if such person has no principal place of business in this state, 
at such person's principal office or such person's residence. Upon the 
conclusion of the investigation, the Attorney General shall where 
necessary, report any findings to the Governor, or in matters involving 
criminal activity, to the Chief State's Attorney. In addition to the 
exempt records provision of section 1-210, the Auditors of Public 
Accounts and the Attorney General shall not, after receipt of any 
information from a person under the provisions of this section or 
sections 4-276 to 4-280, inclusive, disclose the identity of such person 
without such person's consent unless the Auditors of Public Accounts 
or the Attorney General determines that such disclosure is 
unavoidable, and may withhold records of such investigation, during 
the pendency of the investigation. All documentary material or other 
information furnished to the Attorney General, his or her deputy or 
any assistant attorney general designated by the Attorney General, 
pursuant to a demand issued under this subsection for the purpose of 
investigating a suspected violation of subsection (a) of section 4-275, 
shall be returned to the person furnishing such documentary material 
or other information upon the termination of the Attorney General's 
investigation or final determination of any action or proceeding 
commenced thereunder. 
(e) (1) No state officer or employee, as defined in section 4-141, no 
quasi-public agency officer or employee, no officer or employee of a 
large state contractor and no appointing authority shall take or 
threaten to take any personnel action against any state or quasi-public 
agency employee or any employee of a large state contractor in 
retaliation for (A) such employee's or contractor's disclosure of 
information to (i) an employee of the Auditors of Public Accounts or 
the Attorney General under the provisions of subsection (a) of this 
section; (ii) an employee of the state agency or quasi-public agency  Senate Bill No. 359 
 
Public Act No. 19-69 	5 of 11 
 
where such state officer or employee is employed; (iii) an employee of 
a state agency pursuant to a mandated reporter statute or pursuant to 
subsection (b) of section 17a-28; (iv) an employee of the Probate Court 
where such employee is employed; or (v) in the case of a large state 
contractor, an employee of the contracting state agency concerning 
information involving the large state contract; or (B) such employee's 
testimony or assistance in any proceeding under this section. 
(2) (A) Not later than ninety days after learning of the specific 
incident giving rise to a claim that a personnel action has been 
threatened or has occurred in violation of subdivision (1) of this 
subsection, a state or quasi-public agency employee, an employee of a 
large state contractor or the employee's attorney may file a complaint 
against the state agency, quasi-public agency, Probate Court, large 
state contractor or appointing authority concerning such personnel 
action with the Chief Human Rights Referee designated under section 
46a-57. Such complaint may be amended if an additional incident 
giving rise to a claim under this subdivision occurs subsequent to the 
filing of the original complaint. The Chief Human Rights Referee shall 
assign the complaint to a human rights referee appointed under 
section 46a-57, who shall conduct a hearing and issue a decision 
concerning whether the officer or employee taking or threatening to 
take the personnel action violated any provision of this section. The 
human rights referee may order a state agency, quasi-public agency or 
Probate Court to produce (i) an employee of such agency, quasi-public 
agency or Probate Court to testify as a witness in any proceeding 
under this subdivision, or (ii) books, papers or other documents 
relevant to the complaint, without issuing a subpoena. If such agency, 
quasi-public agency or Probate Court fails to produce such witness, 
books, papers or documents, not later than thirty days after such order, 
the human rights referee may consider such failure as supporting 
evidence for the complainant. If, after the hearing, the human rights 
referee finds a violation, the referee may award the aggrieved  Senate Bill No. 359 
 
Public Act No. 19-69 	6 of 11 
 
employee reinstatement to the employee's former position, back pay 
and reestablishment of any employee benefits for which the employee 
would otherwise have been eligible if such violation had not occurred, 
reasonable attorneys' fees, and any other damages. For the purposes of 
this subsection, such human rights referee shall act as an independent 
hearing officer. The decision of a human rights referee under this 
subsection may be appealed by any person who was a party at such 
hearing, in accordance with the provisions of section 4-183. 
(B) The Chief Human Rights Referee shall adopt regulations, in 
accordance with the provisions of chapter 54, establishing the 
procedure for filing complaints and noticing and conducting hearings 
under subparagraph (A) of this subdivision. 
(3) As an alternative to the provisions of subdivision (2) of this 
subsection: (A) A state or quasi-public agency employee who alleges 
that a personnel action has been threatened or taken may file an appeal 
not later than ninety days after learning of the specific incident giving 
rise to such claim with the Employees' Review Board under section 5-
202, or, in the case of a state or quasi-public agency employee covered 
by a collective bargaining contract, in accordance with the procedure 
provided by such contract; or (B) an employee of a large state 
contractor alleging that such action has been threatened or taken may, 
after exhausting all available administrative remedies, bring a civil 
action in accordance with the provisions of subsection (c) of section 31-
51m. 
(4) In any proceeding under subdivision (2) or (3) of this subsection 
concerning a personnel action taken or threatened against any state or 
quasi-public agency employee or any employee of a large state 
contractor, which personnel action occurs not later than two years after 
the employee first transmits facts and information concerning a matter 
under subsection (a) of this section or discloses information under 
subdivision (1) of this subsection to the Auditors of Public Accounts,  Senate Bill No. 359 
 
Public Act No. 19-69 	7 of 11 
 
the Attorney General or an employee of a state agency, quasi-public 
agency or Probate Court, as applicable, there shall be a rebuttable 
presumption that the personnel action is in retaliation for the action 
taken by the employee under subsection (a) of this section or 
subdivision (1) of this subsection. 
(5) If a state officer or employee, as defined in section 4-141, a quasi-
public agency officer or employee, an officer or employee of a large 
state contractor or an appointing authority takes or threatens to take 
any action to impede, fail to renew or cancel a contract between a state 
agency and a large state contractor, or between a large state contractor 
and its subcontractor, in retaliation for the disclosure of information 
pursuant to subsection (a) of this section or subdivision (1) of this 
subsection to any agency listed in subdivision (1) of this subsection, 
such affected agency, contractor or subcontractor may, not later than 
ninety days after learning of such action, threat or failure to renew, 
bring a civil action in the superior court for the judicial district of 
Hartford to recover damages, attorney's fees and costs. 
(f) Any employee of a state agency, quasi-public agency, Probate 
Court or large state contractor, who is found by the Auditors of Public 
Accounts, the Attorney General, a human rights referee or the 
Employees' Review Board to have knowingly and maliciously made 
false charges under subsection (a) of this section, shall be subject to 
disciplinary action by such employee's appointing authority up to and 
including dismissal. In the case of a state or quasi-public agency 
employee, such action shall be subject to appeal to the Employees' 
Review Board in accordance with section 5-202, or in the case of state 
or quasi-public agency employees included in collective bargaining 
contracts, the procedure provided by such contracts. 
(g) On or before September first, annually, the Auditors of Public 
Accounts shall submit, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-
4a, to the clerk of each house of the General Assembly a report  Senate Bill No. 359 
 
Public Act No. 19-69 	8 of 11 
 
indicating the number of matters for which facts and information were 
transmitted to the auditors pursuant to this section during the 
preceding state fiscal year and the disposition of each such matter. 
(h) Each contract between a state or quasi-public agency and a large 
state contractor shall provide that, if an officer, employee or 
appointing authority of a large state contractor takes or threatens to 
take any personnel action against any employee of the contractor in 
retaliation for such employee's disclosure of information to any 
employee of the contracting state or quasi-public agency or the 
Auditors of Public Accounts or the Attorney General under the 
provisions of subsection (a) or subdivision (1) of subsection (e) of this 
section, the contractor shall be liable for a civil penalty of not more 
than five thousand dollars for each offense, up to a maximum of 
twenty per cent of the value of the contract. Each violation shall be a 
separate and distinct offense and in the case of a continuing violation 
each calendar day's continuance of the violation shall be deemed to be 
a separate and distinct offense. The executive head of the state or 
quasi-public agency may request the Attorney General to bring a civil 
action in the superior court for the judicial district of Hartford to seek 
imposition and recovery of such civil penalty. 
(i) Each state agency or quasi-public agency shall post a notice of the 
provisions of this section relating to state employees and quasi-public 
agency employees in a conspicuous place that is readily available for 
viewing by employees of such agency or quasi-public agency. Each 
Probate Court shall post a notice of the provisions of this section 
relating to Probate Court employees in a conspicuous place that is 
readily available for viewing by employees of such court. Each large 
state contractor shall post a notice of the provisions of this section 
relating to large state contractors in a conspicuous place which is 
readily available for viewing by the employees of the contractor. 
(j) No person who, in good faith, discloses information in  Senate Bill No. 359 
 
Public Act No. 19-69 	9 of 11 
 
accordance with the provisions of this section shall be liable for any 
civil damages resulting from such good faith disclosure. 
(k) As used in this section: 
(1) "Large state contract" means a contract having a value of five 
million dollars or more (A) between an entity and a state or quasi-
public agency, [having a value of five million dollars or more] or (B) 
for the receipt of financial assistance by an entity from the state 
pursuant to title 32; and 
(2) "Large state contractor" means an entity that has entered into a 
large state contract with a state or quasi-public agency. 
(l) (1) No officer or employee of a state shellfish grounds lessee shall 
take or threaten to take any personnel action against any employee of a 
state shellfish grounds lessee in retaliation for (A) such employee's 
disclosure of information to an employee of the leasing agency 
concerning information involving the state shellfish grounds lease, or 
(B) such employee's testimony or assistance in any proceeding under 
this section. 
(2) (A) Not later than ninety days after learning of the specific 
incident giving rise to a claim that a personnel action has been 
threatened or has occurred in violation of subdivision (1) of this 
subsection, an employee of a state shellfish grounds lessee or the 
employee's attorney may file a complaint against the state shellfish 
grounds lessee concerning such personnel action with the Chief 
Human Rights Referee designated under section 46a -57. Such 
complaint may be amended if an additional incident giving rise to a 
claim under this subdivision occurs subsequent to the filing of the 
original complaint. The Chief Human Rights Referee shall assign the 
complaint to a human rights referee appointed under section 46a-57, 
who shall conduct a hearing and issue a decision concerning whether  Senate Bill No. 359 
 
Public Act No. 19-69 	10 of 11 
 
the officer or employee taking or threatening to take the personnel 
action violated any provision of this subsection. The human rights 
referee may order a state shellfish grounds lessee to produce (i) an 
employee of such lessee to testify as a witness in any proceeding under 
this subdivision, or (ii) books, papers or other documents relevant to 
the complaint, without issuing a subpoena. If such state shellfish 
grounds lessee fails to produce such witness, books, papers or 
documents, not later than thirty days after such order, the human 
rights referee may consider such failure as supporting evidence for the 
complainant. If, after the hearing, the human rights referee finds a 
violation, the referee may award the aggrieved employee 
reinstatement to the employee's former position, back pay and 
reestablishment of any employee benefits for which the employee 
would otherwise have been eligible if such violation had not occurred, 
reasonable attorneys' fees and any other damages. For the purposes of 
this subsection, such human rights referee shall act as an independent 
hearing officer. The decision of a human rights referee under this 
subsection may be appealed by any person who was a party at such 
hearing, in accordance with the provisions of section 4-183. 
(B) The Chief Human Rights Referee shall adopt regulations, in 
accordance with the provisions of chapter 54, establishing the 
procedure for filing complaints and noticing and conducting hearings 
under subparagraph (A) of this subdivision. 
(3) As an alternative to the provisions of subdivision (2) of this 
subsection, an employee of a state shellfish grounds lessee who alleges 
that a personnel action has been threatened or taken may, after 
exhausting all available administrative remedies, bring a civil action in 
accordance with the provisions of subsection (c) of section 31-51m. 
(4) In any proceeding under subdivision (2) or (3) of this subsection 
concerning a personnel action taken or threatened against any 
employee of a state shellfish grounds lessee, which personnel action  Senate Bill No. 359 
 
Public Act No. 19-69 	11 of 11 
 
occurs not later than two years after the employee first transmits facts 
and information to an employee of the leasing agency concerning the 
state shellfish grounds lease, there shall be a rebuttable presumption 
that the personnel action is in retaliation for the action taken by the 
employee under subdivision (1) of this subsection.