Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00377

Introduced
1/23/19  
Refer
1/23/19  
Refer
1/23/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Report Pass
3/22/19  
Refer
4/4/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  

Caption

An Act Prohibiting The Use Of Noncompete Clauses In Physician Employment Contracts.

Impact

If enacted, SB00377 would significantly alter the landscape of physician employment contracts in the state. Specifically, the bill would render any existing noncompete agreements void and unenforceable, thereby empowering physicians to leave their current positions without the fear of legal repercussions for competing locally. This change is expected to facilitate a more dynamic employment market for healthcare workers, potentially leading to improved patient care as physicians would be able to practice in a wider geographical area without unnecessary contractual limitations.

Summary

SB00377 is a legislative proposal that seeks to prohibit the use of noncompete clauses in employment contracts for physicians. This bill aims to enhance the mobility of physicians by ensuring they can practice medicine without restrictions that inhibit their ability to change employers. The intent behind this legislation is to foster competition within the healthcare sector, ultimately benefiting patients by increasing their access to healthcare providers. The bill clearly defines what constitutes a noncompete clause and outlines the conditions under which such clauses may be deemed invalid and unenforceable.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00377 has been largely positive among healthcare providers, particularly physicians who feel that noncompete clauses restrict their professional opportunities and negatively impact patient access to care. Advocates emphasize that the removal of these clauses will help cultivate a more competitive environment within the healthcare industry. However, there are concerns voiced by some healthcare administrators and organizations about the potential challenges this could pose in retaining talent and maintaining business stability.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB00377 revolve around the balance between physician autonomy and the need for healthcare organizations to protect their business interests. Opponents of the bill argue that noncompete clauses are essential for safeguarding confidential business information and ensuring investment returns in training and resources. The debate highlights an ongoing tension within healthcare employment practices as stakeholders discuss the implications of removing such legal protections in a rapidly evolving healthcare landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA HB702

Provides with respect to the practice of physician assistants

HI SB61

Relating To Associate Physicians.

HI SB61

Relating To Associate Physicians.

CO SB083

Physician Assistant Collaboration Requirements

TN HB2318

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 55; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to healthcare providers.

TN SB2136

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 55; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to healthcare providers.

TN SB0937

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to graduate physicians.

TN HB1311

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to graduate physicians.