| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | 3 | LCO No. 2560 1 of 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | ||
| 5 | 5 | General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 684 | |
| 6 | 6 | January Session, 2019 | |
| 7 | 7 | LCO No. 2560 | |
| 8 | 8 | ||
| 9 | 9 | ||
| 10 | 10 | Referred to Committee on GENERAL LAW | |
| 11 | 11 | ||
| 12 | 12 | ||
| 13 | 13 | Introduced by: | |
| 14 | 14 | SEN. KISSEL, 7th Dist. | |
| 15 | 15 | ||
| 16 | 16 | ||
| 17 | 17 | ||
| 18 | 18 | AN ACT CONCERNING RETAILER POLICIES CONCERNING | |
| 19 | 19 | COMPROMISED DEBIT OR CREDIT CARDS. | |
| 20 | 20 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General | |
| 21 | 21 | Assembly convened: | |
| 22 | 22 | ||
| 23 | 23 | That title 21a of the general statutes be amended to prohibit any 1 | |
| 24 | 24 | retailer doing business in the state, including via the Internet, from 2 | |
| 25 | 25 | banning a consumer from shopping solely because a bank reported 3 | |
| 26 | 26 | false credit or debit card charges due to a compromised credit or debit 4 | |
| 27 | 27 | card, unless the retailer has a written company policy. 5 | |
| 28 | 28 | Statement of Purpose: | |
| 29 | 29 | To provide transparency to consumers concerning company policies. |