Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01061

Introduced
3/12/19  
Refer
3/12/19  
Report Pass
3/25/19  
Report Pass
3/25/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Report Pass
4/15/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Restoration Of Funds To The Community Investment Account.

Impact

If enacted, SB01061 would have significant implications for state laws regarding budgetary allocations and the management of investment funds intended for community development. By repealing sections that allow the transfer of community funds to the General Fund, the bill aims to protect resources that are critical for local investments and services. This legislative change could lead to an increased availability of funds specifically designated for community-oriented projects, thereby potentially enhancing local development initiatives.

Summary

SB01061, titled 'An Act Concerning The Restoration Of Funds To The Community Investment Account,' was introduced to amend the provisions related to funding transfers from the Community Investment Account to the state's General Fund. This bill specifically seeks to restore $5 million that was previously allocated to the General Fund for the fiscal years ending in June 2018 and June 2019. Its introduction focuses on ensuring that funding designated for community investments is safeguarded and properly managed.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB01061 was overwhelmingly positive, particularly among lawmakers advocating for community development. The unanimous vote of 29 yeas with no nays on March 25, 2019, underscores a bipartisan agreement on the importance of restoring the funds to the Community Investment Account. However, there may be underlying concerns regarding state budgetary impacts, as some legislators may view the restoration of funds as a limitation on the state's financial flexibility.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the debate over state versus local control of funding and the sustainable management of state resources. While proponents emphasize the need for dedicated community investment, some critics argue that increased earmarking of funds could limit the state's ability to respond to broader fiscal challenges or emergencies. This debate highlights a broader discussion on fiscal responsibility and the prioritization of community funding in the context of overall state governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.