Connecticut Senate Bill SR00011

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/19
• Refer: 1/28/19
• Refer: 2/15/19
• Report Pass: 2/15/19

Caption

Resolution Proposing Approval Of A Collective Bargaining Agreement Between The State Of Connecticut Judicial Branch And The Judicial Professional Employees Union, Jpe/aft-ct, Afl-cio.

Impact

The resolution's approval has implications for labor relations within the Connecticut Judicial Branch, enhancing job security and conditions for judicial professional employees. By endorsing the collective bargaining agreement, the legislature acknowledges the importance of union representation in negotiating workers' rights and workplace standards. This approval may also set a precedent for future collective bargaining efforts within state agencies and improve the overall morale of judicial employees, fostering a more collaborative environment between the state and its workforce.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 11, introduced by Senator Looney, seeks the approval of a collective bargaining agreement between the State of Connecticut Judicial Branch and the Judicial Professional Employees Union, JPE/AFT-CT, AFL-CIO. This bill is a procedural measure, specifically addressing the framework for labor relations within the state's judicial system. The resolution supports the ratification of terms negotiated between state representatives and the union, signifying a formal endorsement of the agreement by the legislative body.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding SR00011 appears to be positive, focusing on the importance of collective bargaining as a means of ensuring fair labor practices for judicial employees. Senators who supported the resolution likely view this agreement as a necessary step in maintaining a productive and equitable workforce within the judicial system. However, there may be mixed feelings among those who are concerned about the broader implications of union agreements in state governance, although specific opposition was not documented in the available discussions.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise from differing views on the role of unions in state employment sectors and the potential financial implications of the collective bargaining agreement. While no direct opposition has been noted in the discussions surrounding SR00011, debates regarding union negotiations often highlight concerns about budget management and the sustainability of such agreements in the long term. As such, the approval of this resolution may evoke discussions about the balance of interests between state financial responsibilities and employee rights.