Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05067

Introduced
1/11/21  
Refer
1/11/21  

Caption

An Act Requiring Informed Consent For A Pelvic Or Prostate Examination On A Patient Who Is Under Deep Sedation Or Anesthesia Or Unconscious.

Impact

If enacted, HB05067 would amend existing statutes regarding medical practices, ensuring that patients are not subjected to pelvic or prostate examinations without their awareness and consent. This change is part of a broader effort to enforce patient rights and promote transparency in healthcare. The bill stands to impact the protocols used in hospitals and clinics, necessitating training and adjustments for healthcare providers to comply with the new legal requirement. This could lead to an increase in healthcare professionals' responsibilities when it comes to obtaining consent, ultimately strengthening patient-provider relationships.

Summary

House Bill HB05067 is an act aimed at ensuring informed consent for pelvic or prostate examinations on patients who are under deep sedation, anesthesia, or are unconscious. The bill stipulates that any physician, medical student, or participant in a residency or clinical training program must obtain explicit consent from a patient before performing such examinations under these circumstances. This move seeks to protect patient dignity and autonomy, particularly during vulnerable moments when patients cannot consent due to their medical state. By clearly defining the requirement for informed consent, the legislation aims to uphold the ethical standards in medical practice regarding sensitive examinations.

Contention

While the bill is largely framed as a patient protection measure, some stakeholders are concerned about the implications it may have on medical practice. Critics may argue that requiring consent in such scenarios could hinder the timely provision of care in critical situations. Additionally, there may be a need for further clarification on how this requirement will be enforced and whether there will be penalties for non-compliance. Supporters, however, contend that the measure is necessary to prevent any potential abuse of patient rights and to foster a healthcare environment where patient consent is always prioritized, regardless of the circumstances.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.