Connecticut House Bill HB06547

Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/21
• Refer: 2/26/21
• Report Pass: 3/21/21
• Refer: 3/30/21
• Report Pass: 4/7/21
• Engrossed: 6/1/21
• Report Pass: 6/2/21
• Passed: 6/4/21
• Chaptered: 6/15/21
• Enrolled: 6/16/21
• Passed: 6/28/21

Caption

An Act Concerning A Working Group Regarding The Protection And Preservation Of Historic Properties.

Impact

If enacted, HB 6547 will significantly enhance the capacity of local governments and historical societies by providing a structured plan and potential funding mechanisms for the acquisition and preservation of historic landmarks. The bill emphasizes the necessity of a revolving fund to facilitate efforts such as acquiring preservation easements and purchasing properties that can be restored and reused. This funding is intended to support a range of activities essential for historic preservation, ensuring that significant cultural resources are maintained for future generations.

Summary

House Bill 6547 aims to establish a working group focused on the protection and preservation of historic properties. The legislation mandates the Commissioner of Economic and Community Development to convene this group, which will comprise representatives from local historical societies, state agencies, and other relevant organizations. The group's primary objective will be to develop a comprehensive plan that supports municipalities and nonprofit entities in their historic preservation efforts, particularly for properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places or designated as historically significant by local authorities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6547 appears to be predominantly positive, as stakeholders in the historic preservation community express support for measures that enhance their capacity to protect cultural heritage. The establishment of a working group is viewed favorably as it indicates a collaborative approach to addressing historic preservation challenges. Stakeholders believe this initiative will unify efforts across various organizations and create a more coordinated strategy for preserving significant sites, which many see as integral to the state's cultural identity.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, there could be contention surrounding the allocation of resources and the prioritization of certain historic properties over others. Critiques may arise from entities that feel underrepresented in the working group or those concerned about potential bureaucratic barriers to accessing funds. Additionally, stakeholders may debate the criteria for determining which properties are deemed 'historically significant,' as this could influence future preservation efforts.