Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06634

Introduced
3/16/21  
Refer
3/16/21  
Report Pass
3/31/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Refer
4/12/21  
Report Pass
4/19/21  
Report Pass
4/19/21  
Engrossed
5/19/21  
Report Pass
5/21/21  
Report Pass
5/21/21  
Passed
6/4/21  
Chaptered
6/15/21  
Chaptered
6/15/21  
Enrolled
6/16/21  
Enrolled
6/16/21  
Passed
6/24/21  

Caption

An Act Concerning Essential Support Persons And A State-wide Visitation Policy For Residents Of Long-term Care Facilities.

Impact

The passage of HB 6634 is significant in safeguarding the rights of long-term care facility residents, particularly during public health emergencies, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic, when regular visiting protocols were severely restricted. By formalizing the role of essential support persons, the bill aims to enhance the mental and emotional well-being of residents, fostering better overall health outcomes. The legislation also requires that state health authorities set clear rules for visitation and prioritize resident welfare in the face of public health crises.

Summary

House Bill 6634, known as the Act Concerning Essential Support Persons and a State-wide Visitation Policy for Residents of Long-term Care Facilities, aims to establish a formalized visitation policy for residents within long-term care facilities, such as nursing homes. The bill provides a framework for residents to designate a primary and secondary essential support person who can visit them, even during general visitation restrictions. This legislation seeks to ensure that residents receive necessary emotional, social, and physical support from their designated visitors, aligning with their personalized care plans.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6634 has been largely positive among advocates for resident rights and family members of long-term care residents. Supporters argue that the bill represents a necessary evolution in how long-term care facilities accommodate resident needs, particularly with an emphasis on mental health and emotional support. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the implementation of safety protocols and the adequacy of resources to manage these changes.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential challenges in consistent implementation across various facilities, especially concerning adherence to the established safety protocols during health emergencies. Critics have expressed worries that without adequate training and resources, the effectiveness of the bill may be compromised. Furthermore, discussions on the level of oversight required to ensure compliance with the new visitation policy have been prominent, indicating a need for robust regulatory measures to protect resident rights.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI SB0703

Occupations: cosmetologists; branch facilities for a school of cosmetology; provide for. Amends 1980 PA 299 (MCL 339.101 - 339.2677) by adding sec. 1205b.

MI SB0131

Occupations: cosmetologists; branch facilities for a school of cosmetology; provide for. Amends 1980 PA 299 (MCL 339.101 - 339.2677) by adding sec. 1205b.

UT HB0274

Water Amendments

MI HB5403

Occupations: cosmetologists; branch facilities for a school of cosmetology; provide for. Amends 1980 PA 299 (MCL 339.101 - 339.2677) by adding sec. 1205b. TIE BAR WITH: SB 1081'24

MO HB2

APPROPRIATIONS BILL

NM HB310

Responsible Electric Car Battery End Of Life

WV SB14

Relating to nonferrous metal sales and transportation to secondary recycler

TX SB1581

Relating to the regulation of secondary market transactions related to the business of life settlements; providing penalties; authorizing fees.