Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06684

Introduced
5/7/21  
Refer
5/7/21  
Refer
5/7/21  
Report Pass
5/19/21  
Report Pass
5/19/21  
Refer
5/24/21  
Refer
5/24/21  
Report Pass
6/1/21  
Report Pass
6/1/21  
Engrossed
6/5/21  
Engrossed
6/5/21  
Report Pass
6/6/21  
Passed
6/9/21  
Passed
6/9/21  
Chaptered
6/25/21  
Chaptered
6/25/21  
Enrolled
6/28/21  
Enrolled
6/28/21  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Conveyance Of A Parcel Of State Land In The Town Of Wilton.

Impact

The bill seeks to enhance local economic activity by granting the town of Wilton a parcel of state-owned land for commercial use. By transferring state land for municipal purposes, the bill promotes community engagement and economic diversification. However, it also establishes conditions that could lead to the parcel reverting to state ownership if the town fails to comply with the use and ownership stipulations outlined in the bill. This ensures that the land is utilized effectively for its intended purpose and not vacated or misused.

Summary

House Bill 6684, known as the Special Act No. 21-29, focuses on the conveyance of a specific parcel of state land located in the town of Wilton, Connecticut. The bill mandates the Commissioner of Transportation to transfer approximately 3.15 acres of land to the town, with the conveyance cost being limited to administrative expenses. This act aims to facilitate local development by allowing the town to utilize the land for a landscaping business. It sets clear stipulations on its future use to ensure that the parcel serves the intended purpose.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6684 appears to be generally positive, as it supports local initiatives and economic growth through the proper utilization of state resources. The bill received a unanimous vote, reflecting a bipartisan consensus on the importance of local development. Stakeholders likely view the bill as a constructive step towards empowering municipalities and improving local business momentum.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, it may also face scrutiny regarding the long-term implications of transferring state land to municipalities. Critics could argue that conditions allowing the land to revert should be considered carefully to prevent potential misuse or inefficiencies in the management of public assets. Nonetheless, the bill is structured to ensure accountability and proper oversight through the involvement of the State Properties Review Board.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.