| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | 3 | LCO No. 142 1 of 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | ||
| 5 | 5 | General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 111 | |
| 6 | 6 | January Session, 2021 | |
| 7 | 7 | LCO No. 142 | |
| 8 | 8 | ||
| 9 | 9 | ||
| 10 | 10 | Referred to Committee on PUBLIC HEALTH | |
| 11 | 11 | ||
| 12 | 12 | ||
| 13 | 13 | Introduced by: | |
| 14 | 14 | SEN. ANWAR, 3rd Dist. | |
| 15 | 15 | ||
| 16 | 16 | ||
| 17 | 17 | ||
| 18 | 18 | AN ACT LIMITING THE USE OF PERFLUOROALKYL AND | |
| 19 | 19 | POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES AND EXPANDED | |
| 20 | 20 | POLYSTYRENE IN FOOD PACKAGING. | |
| 21 | 21 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General | |
| 22 | 22 | Assembly convened: | |
| 23 | 23 | ||
| 24 | 24 | That the general statutes be amended to require the Department of 1 | |
| 25 | 25 | Public Health to examine the availability of reasonable alternatives to 2 | |
| 26 | 26 | any food packaging product that contains an intentionally added 3 | |
| 27 | 27 | perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance or expanded polystyrene 4 | |
| 28 | 28 | and prohibit the manufacture, sale and distribution for sale or for use in 5 | |
| 29 | 29 | the state any food packaging that contains a perfluoroalkyl or 6 | |
| 30 | 30 | polyfluoroalkyl substance or expanded polystyrene that was 7 | |
| 31 | 31 | intentionally added to such packaging in any amount when the 8 | |
| 32 | 32 | department has determined that a reasonable alternative to such food 9 | |
| 33 | 33 | packaging is available. 10 | |
| 34 | 34 | Statement of Purpose: | |
| 35 | 35 | To limit the use of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances and | |
| 36 | 36 | expanded polystyrene in food packaging. |