An Act Concerning Universal Civic Duty Voting.
The bill represents a significant shift in voting regulations, aiming to encourage higher voter turnout and civic responsibility. By implementing a system where voters must justify their decision not to participate, the bill could potentially lead to an increase in civic engagement. However, the proposed penalties and requirements raise legal and ethical questions regarding voter rights and freedoms, particularly concerning the imposition of fines for not voting.
SB00180, titled 'An Act Concerning Universal Civic Duty Voting,' proposes to amend the state's election laws to require that all qualified electors must either cast a ballot or provide a valid reason for not doing so at each state election starting in 2024. The Secretary of the State will be mandated to contact those who do not vote, asking for their reasons, and set a fine of twenty dollars for non-compliance unless a valid reason is provided. This aims to enhance voter engagement and ensure accountability among electors.
While proponents argue that this bill will foster a culture of participation and accountability among voters, opponents may view the mandatory nature of voting and the subsequent penalties as an overreach by the government. They might argue that such measures could disproportionately affect low-income residents who may have valid reasons for not voting but cannot afford the fines. The balance between encouraging voter participation and maintaining individual liberties is expected to be a contentious point in legislative discussions surrounding this bill.