Connecticut Senate Bill SB00970

Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/21
• Refer: 2/26/21
• Report Pass: 3/21/21
• Refer: 3/30/21
• Report Pass: 4/7/21
• Engrossed: 5/13/21
• Report Pass: 5/14/21

Caption

An Act Concerning Extending The Time Of Expiration Of Certain Land Use Permits.

Impact

The impact of SB00970 on state laws is primarily seen in its changes to the expiration of land use permits. With the new provisions, permits that have not yet expired can now have extended timelines for completion. This can allow developers additional time to navigate the complexities involved in land development as well as financial challenges, aiming to reduce the pressures they face from tight deadlines. Consequently, this may lead to increased development activity and provide a buffer during economic fluctuations that might otherwise halt projects.

Summary

SB00970, an act concerning extending the time of expiration of certain land use permits, seeks to amend existing statutes that regulate land use in order to provide flexibility for approvals related to site plans and subdivisions. The bill proposes adjustments in expiration terms, particularly for permits that were approved prior to certain cut-off dates. By extending the duration of these permits, it aims to support developers in completing their projects without the fear of expiration, thus potentially fostering construction and development activities statewide.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment towards SB00970 appears supportive among development stakeholders, as it reflects a recognition of the difficulties faced in the construction sector, particularly following the challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Proponents argue that this legislation will help bolster economic growth by alleviating regulatory burdens. Conversely, there may be concerns from community advocates about the potential implications for local land use planning and community impacts, though these did not dominate the discussions noted in the legislative history.

Contention

While the bill is largely viewed positively, notable points of contention revolve around the implications of extending permit times. Critics argue that longer permit durations could lead to stagnation in land use that ultimately detracts from community needs and responsiveness to immediate local issues. There is a delicate balance to be struck between facilitating development and ensuring that community interests are adequately represented, making it a topic of ongoing discussion among stakeholders in land use regulation.