Connecticut 2022 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05249

Introduced
2/24/22  
Introduced
2/24/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Report Pass
3/10/22  
Refer
3/21/22  

Caption

An Act Concerning Noncompete Agreements.

Impact

If enacted, HB 05249 would amend existing labor laws around noncompete clauses, promoting a fairer employment landscape by making it more challenging for employers to impose such agreements. The bill provides that any noncompliance with its provisions can lead to penalties, and it places the burden of proof on employers seeking to enforce these agreements. This shift is significant as it aims to empower workers legally against their employers and address issues of worker mobility and employment flexibility.

Summary

House Bill 05249, titled 'An Act Concerning Noncompete Agreements,' seeks to regulate noncompete and exclusivity agreements in order to enhance worker rights and reduce undue restrictions on employment. The bill prohibits employers from enforcing a noncompete agreement unless specific conditions are met, such as limiting the duration to one year and ensuring it is necessary to protect a legitimate business interest. Furthermore, exclusivity agreements can only be required of workers who are compensated above certain thresholds, effectively aiming to protect lower-wage workers from restrictive employment practices.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 05249 appears to be overwhelmingly positive among labor advocates, who view it as a necessary reform to protect workers’ rights against potentially exploitative practices. However, some business groups express concerns about the potential negative impact on employers’ ability to protect their legitimate business interests. The debate showcases a clash between the need for employee protection and the need for businesses to safeguard trade secrets and proprietary information.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise over how the bill might affect the competitive landscape within industries that rely heavily on specialized skill sets. Critics argue that overly restrictive measures on noncompete agreements could hinder employers' ability to protect valuable intellectual property, while proponents assert that such measures are essential to ensure that employees can freely pursue advancement opportunities without fear of legal repercussions. The ongoing discussions suggest a complex balancing act between fostering a robust labor market and safeguarding business interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05269

An Act Concerning Noncompete Agreements.

CT SB00409

An Act Concerning Wage Theft Responsibility.

CT SB00201

An Act Concerning Unfair Real Estate Listing Agreements And The Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act.

CT SB00361

An Act Concerning The Impermissible Use Of Nondisclosure Agreements In The Workplace.

CT SB00004

An Act Concerning Victims Of Domestic Violence, The Unsolicited Transmission Of Intimate Images By Means Of An Electronic Communication Device And The Impermissible Use Of Nondisclosure Agreements In The Workplace.

CT SB00002

An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence.

CT SB00413

An Act Concerning Predictable Scheduling.

CT HB05376

An Act Concerning Home Improvement Contractors And Salespersons.

CT SB00389

An Act Concerning The State Contracting Standards Board And State Procurement.

CT SB00137

An Act Concerning Gas, Electric, Sewer And Water Delivery Work.

Similar Bills

CA AB233

Insurance: licensees.

CA SB809

Employees and independent contractors: construction trucking.

CA AB2754

Employment contracts and agreements: sufficient funds: liability.

CA AB334

Public contracts: conflicts of interest.

CA AB1514

Worker classification: employees and independent contractors: licensed manicurists: commercial fishers.

NV AB255

Prohibits certain provisions in certain employment contracts or similar agreements. (BDR 53-116)

CA AB1454

Trauma-informed diversion programs for youth.

CA AB1032

Courts: court interpreters.