Connecticut 2022 2022 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05372 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 05/13/2022

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
sHB-5372 
AN ACT CONCERNING PERIODIC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 
ASSESSMENTS, POLICE OFFICER RECRUITMENT, SCHOOL 
RESOURCE OFFICERS, REPORTING OF VIOLATIONS TO THE 
POLICE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING COUNCIL, 
INVESTIGATIONS BY THE INSPECTOR GENERAL AND 
MINIMUM STANDARDS AND PRACTICES FOR THE 
ADMINISTRATION, MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF LAW 
ENFORCEMENT UNITS. 
As Amended by House "A" (LCO 6334) 
House Calendar No.: 347 
Senate Calendar No.: 555  
 
Primary Analyst: ME 	5/10/22 
Contributing Analyst(s):    
Reviewer: PR 
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
 
State Impact: 
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 23 $ FY 24 $ 
Higher Education Constituent 
Units 
Various - Cost 221,122 None 
Note: Various=Various 
  
Municipal Impact: None  
Explanation 
The bill makes various changes regarding law enforcement units 
resulting in a cost to the Higher Education Constituent Units, described 
below. 
Sections 1-2 make changes to police officer behavioral health 
assessments and expand the requirements for law enforcement unit 
guidelines on minority police recruitment, resulting in no fiscal impact 
to the state. 
Section 3 requires a study by a public higher education institution  2022HB-05372-R01-FN.DOCX 	Page 2 of 3 
 
 
that is anticipated to result in a total estimated cost of $221,122 to either 
the Board of Regents or the University of Connecticut, across FY 22 and 
FY 23. The bill prescribes extensive research and a report to be 
completed in approximately six months.  It is anticipated that the depth 
and speed of these activities will require two professors and two part-
time graduate assistants at: (1) salary costs totaling approximately 
$110,711; and (2) fringe benefit costs of an estimated $110,412.
1
  If the 
study begins in FY 22, then total costs may be split between FY 22 (an 
estimated $36,854 for one-month costs) and FY 23 ($184,268 for five-
month costs).  These costs may be funded by either the General Fund or 
other higher education institution revenues (e.g., tuition).  If wage costs 
are funded through the General Fund, then the fringe benefits costs will 
be incurred within the Office of the State Comptroller. 
Sections 4-5 require the Police Officer Standards and Training 
Council (POST) to notify the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) if a 
municipal chief law enforcement office or the Department of Emergency 
Services and Public Protection fails to make a required use of excessive 
force report to POST.  There is no fiscal impact for the OIG to conduct 
these additional investigations of failure to report as it is already the 
OIG's duty to investigate use of excessive force. 
House "A" removes the section requiring POST to develop tiers of law 
enforcement standards which removes the cost to the Department of 
Emergency Services and Public Protection and the State Comptroller 
and the potential savings to municipalities.  
House "A" also makes changes to the composition of the Correction 
Advisory Committee and makes a technical change to the study of 
school resource officers resulting in no fiscal impact. 
 
1
 The fringe benefit costs for employees funded out of other appropriated funds are 
budgeted within the fringe benefit account of those funds, as opposed to the fringe 
benefit accounts within the Office of the State Comptroller. The estimated active 
employee fringe benefit cost associated with most personnel changes for other 
appropriated fund employees is 99.73% of payroll in FY 23. 
  2022HB-05372-R01-FN.DOCX 	Page 3 of 3 
 
 
The Out Years 
None. 
The preceding Fiscal Impact statement is prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely 
for the purposes of information, summarization and explanation and does not represent the intent of the General 
Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose. In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of 
informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge. Whenever applicable, agency data is 
consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any 
specific department.