Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06904

Introduced
3/15/23  
Refer
3/15/23  
Refer
3/15/23  
Report Pass
3/24/23  
Report Pass
3/24/23  
Refer
4/4/23  
Refer
4/4/23  

Caption

An Act Concerning Campaign Finance.

Impact

One of the main impacts of HB 6904 is the proposed increase in the limits on contributions to state central committees, raising the cap from ten thousand to fifteen thousand dollars. This adjustment aims to enable political parties to gather more financial support, thereby fostering a more competitive political landscape. The bill also stipulates a more expedited process for the resolution of complaints regarding election law violations, which proponents argue will result in a more responsive regulatory environment. By clarifying the processes and limits surrounding campaign financing, the bill aims to enhance the integrity of election processes in the state.

Summary

House Bill 6904 addresses various aspects of campaign finance in Connecticut. The bill proposes revisions to the definitions surrounding campaign contributions and expenditures, as well as the processes followed by the State Elections Enforcement Commission when handling complaints related to violations of election law. With an emphasis on transparency and clarity, the revisions aim to tighten the regulatory framework that governs the funding of electoral campaigns and ensure fair practices in political financing.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6904 appears to be mixed among legislators and stakeholders. Supporters in the legislature view the bill as a necessary update to the existing campaign finance laws, one that would foster greater participation and enable parties to compete effectively. Conversely, critics express concern that increasing contribution limits may lead to undue influence from wealthy donors, thus compromising the electoral process. The discussions reflect broader national debates around campaign finance and its implications for democracy.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the objections raised regarding the potential for increased influence of money in politics with higher contribution limits. Some advocacy groups and opposition legislators argue that raising the cap could undermine citizens' voices by allowing affluent individuals and organizations to exert greater control over political outcomes. Additionally, the timeline for complaint resolution was debated, with concerns that hastening this process might compromise thorough investigations into alleged violations. As such, while the bill aims to enhance the campaign finance structure, it raises fundamental questions about balancing accessibility to campaign funding with maintaining the integrity of the electoral process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00392

An Act Concerning Treasurers Of Candidate Committees And State Elections Enforcement Commission Complaints.

CT SB00253

An Act Concerning Foreign Political Spending.

CT SB01517

An Act Concerning Referenda, Independent Expenditures And Other Campaign Finance Changes.

CT HB07108

An Act Concerning Autism And Intellectual Disability Services And Abuse And Neglect Investigations.

MD HB136

Employment Standards, Prevailing Wage, and Living Wage - Employer Adverse Actions and Enforcement

KY HB517

AN ACT relating to legislative ethics.

CT HB07093

An Act Concerning Referenda, Independent Expenditures And Other Campaign Finance Changes.

CT HB05422

An Act Reestablishing The Legislative Program Review And Investigations Committee.