Connecticut 2024 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SJ00181

Introduced
2/28/24  
Introduced
2/28/24  
Refer
2/28/24  
Refer
2/28/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Refer
4/9/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/16/24  
Refer
4/9/24  
Refer
4/9/24  
Engrossed
5/1/24  
Report Pass
4/16/24  
Report Pass
5/2/24  
Engrossed
5/1/24  
Engrossed
5/1/24  
Passed
5/6/24  
Report Pass
5/2/24  
Report Pass
5/2/24  
Passed
5/6/24  

Caption

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Christopher Platt And Remanding The Matter To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits.

Impact

The implementation of SJ00181 could set a precedent for how claims against the state are processed and evaluated. By remanding cases back to the Claims Commissioner for a full hearing on their merits, there may be an increased accountability measure for how the state handles legal claims. This is particularly significant as it aligns with policies aimed at ensuring due process in claims against governmental entities, which may influence future cases and claims procedures.

Summary

SJ00181, titled 'Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Christopher Platt And Remanding The Matter To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits,' seeks to overturn the dismissal of a claim against the state. The resolution indicates that the previous decision made by the Claims Commissioner regarding the claim filed by Christopher Platt is to be vacated, allowing for the matter to be re-evaluated in detail during a hearing. This bill is particularly focused on ensuring that claims against the state are heard thoroughly rather than dismissed at an initial stage.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding this resolution appears to be largely supportive, emphasizing the importance of fairness and the right to be heard in legal matters involving the state. Stakeholders who advocate for government accountability are likely to view this resolution positively, as it acknowledges the necessity to revisit decisions that may prematurely close cases without adequate consideration.

Contention

While the resolution primarily reinforces a fair hearing process, potential points of contention could arise regarding the implications on state resources and the efficient management of claims. Critics might argue that this increase in hearings could lead to a backlog or additional burden on the Claims Commissioner’s office. However, proponents would argue that these are necessary measures to address individuals' grievances against the state appropriately.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HJ00087

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Dwight Otis And Remanding The Claim To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits.

CT HJ00135

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Renei Stone And Remanding The Claim To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits.

CT HJ00136

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Derrick J. Taylor And Remanding The Claim To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits.

CT HJ00133

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Sandro Solla And Remanding The Claim To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits.

CT HJ00185

Resolution Vacating Decisions Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claims Against The State Of Certain Claimants And Remanding Those Claims To The Claims Commissioner For Further Proceedings.

CT HJ00113

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Joshua Kahan And Remanding The Claim To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits.

CT HJ00037

Resolution Vacating Decisions Of The Claims Commissioner Involving Claims Against The State Of Certain Claimants And Remanding Those Claims To The Claims Commissioner For Further Proceedings.

CT HJ00075

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Jean Barjon And Remanding The Claim To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits.

CT HJ00086

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Melissa Steinhilper, Administratrix Of The Estate Of Amanda Monington And Remanding The Claim To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits.

CT HJ00067

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Jamie Genovese, Administrator For The Estate Of Toni Marie Genovese And Remanding The Claim To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.