Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | ||
2 | 2 | ||
3 | 3 | LCO No. 2452 1 of 1 | |
4 | 4 | ||
5 | 5 | General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 1111 | |
6 | 6 | January Session, 2025 | |
7 | 7 | LCO No. 2452 | |
8 | 8 | ||
9 | 9 | ||
10 | 10 | Referred to Committee on GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION | |
11 | 11 | AND ELECTIONS | |
12 | 12 | ||
13 | 13 | ||
14 | 14 | Introduced by: | |
15 | 15 | SEN. HONIG, 8th Dist. | |
16 | 16 | ||
17 | 17 | ||
18 | 18 | ||
19 | 19 | AN ACT CONCERNING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE | |
20 | 20 | GOVERNOR'S WORKING GROUP ON RANKED-CHOICE VOTING. | |
21 | 21 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General | |
22 | 22 | Assembly convened: | |
23 | 23 | ||
24 | 24 | That title 9 of the general statutes be amended to implement the 1 | |
25 | 25 | recommendations of the Governor's Working Group on Ranked-Choice 2 | |
26 | 26 | Voting by (1) allowing municipalities to use ranked-choice voting in 3 | |
27 | 27 | certain municipal elections, (2) allowing political parties to use ranked-4 | |
28 | 28 | choice voting in party conventions and primaries, (3) allowing political 5 | |
29 | 29 | parties to use ranked-choice voting in presidential preference primaries, 6 | |
30 | 30 | and (4) authorizing the Secretary of the State to defer implementation of 7 | |
31 | 31 | ranked-choice voting procedures upon a determination that issues 8 | |
32 | 32 | related to ballot design, tabulation technology or inadequate resources 9 | |
33 | 33 | necessitate such deferral. 10 | |
34 | 34 | Statement of Purpose: | |
35 | 35 | To allow for ranked-choice voting as recommended by the Governor's | |
36 | 36 | Working Group on Ranked-Choice Voting. |