District Of Columbia 2023-2024 Regular Session

District Of Columbia Council Bill B25-0609 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.
OldNewDifferences
11 November 30, 2023
22 Nyasha Smith, Secretary
33 Council of the District of Columbia
44 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
55 Washington, DC 20004
66 Dear Secretary Smith,
77 Today, I am introducing the Protecting Affordable Loans Amendment Act of 2023 (PALs Act) to
88 prevent out-of-state lenders from partnering with state-chartered banks outside of the District to
99 evade the local usury cap of 24%. The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) has recently
1010 investigated several predatory lenders, including EasyPay, which is alleged to have “charged
1111 customers exorbitant interest rates averaging 163% APR - roughly 7 times higher than DC’s 24%
1212 limit - trapping consumers in cycles of debt that threatened to ruin their credit scores and financial
1313 security.”
1414 1
1515 The PALs Act is the result of collaboration between OAG, the Department of
1616 Insurance, Securities, and Banking (DISB), and the Committee on Business and Economic
1717 Development. This legislation strengthens the tools available for both DISB, the District’s banking
1818 regulator, and OAG, the law enforcement agency charged with protecting consumers.
1919 This type of abusive evasion of the District’s usury cap is possible under the Depository Institution
2020 Deregulation and Monetary Control Act (DIDMCA), enacted by Congress in 1980, which
2121 preempts state usury laws by arguably allowing FDIC-insured, state-chartered banks to contract
2222 for the interest rate permitted by the state in which the bank is located and export that interest rate
2323 into other states. Accordingly, a bank chartered in a state without an interest rate cap can therefore
2424 purportedly lend at usurious rates in many states and in the District. DIDMCA was passed to level
2525 the playing field for state-chartered banks after the Supreme Court ruled in Marquette Nat. Bank
2626 v. First of Omaha Svc. Corp., 439 U.S. 299 (1978), th at nationally-chartered banks are exempt
2727 from state usury laws.
2828 DIDMCA, however, allows states and the District to opt- out from these federal provisions
2929 regarding interest rates of state- chartered federally insured banks. If the District opts out of this
3030 part of DIDMCA, the District can impose its usury caps to prohibit these state-chartered banks
3131 (e.g., a Delaware or South Dakota bank) from importing that state’s usury regulations (neither state
3232 1
3333
3434 “AG Sch walb Secures Comprehensive Financial Relief for Consumers Deceived by Predatory Lend er,
3535 https://oag.dc.gov/release/ag-schwalb-secures-comprehensive- financial-relief (July 12, 2023). has a cap on interest rates) when offering credit terms to District residents. Several states have
3636 exercised this opt-out (some like Iowa in the early years after DIDMCA was passed, and others
3737 more recently, including Colorado in 2023) to strengthen state-level consumer protection and
3838 enforcement against new technology- enabled platforms seeking to “rent” out-of-state banks and
3939 import higher rate lending products into jurisdictions with lower usury caps.
4040 The proposed legislation would exercise the District’s right to opt-out of the federal requirement
4141 that the District apply the interest rates of state- chartered federally insured banks.
4242 •This will close the loophole that allows foreign (as in non- District) state-chartered
4343 banks to import usurious interest rates and largely end the explosion of
4444 nontraditional, fintech- enabled efforts targeting District consumers with these types
4545 of predatory loans.
4646 •The proposed legislation also defines several key terms, including “lender ,” in the
4747 Code to clarify what persons and entities are subject to lending regulations.
4848 Currently, the definition of “lender” (or “true lender,” “de facto lender,” “lender in
4949 fact,” “actual lender,” “nominal lender,” or “real party in interest”) comes from case
5050 law and must often be re litigated case-by-case. This legislation would codify the
5151 factors courts have used with substance-over-form doctrines to prevent entities
5252 from structuring transactions to evade enforcement of consumer protection laws.
5353 Please contact my Committee Director, Justin Kim, at jkim@dccouncil.gov if you have any
5454 questions.
5555 Sincerely,
5656 Kenyan R. McDuffie 1
5757 1
5858 2
5959 _________________________________ 3
6060 Councilmember Kenyan R. McDuffie 4
6161 5
6262 6
6363 7
6464 8
6565 9
6666 A BILL 10
6767 _____________________ 11
6868 12
6969 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 13
7070 ______________________________________________________ 14
7171 15
7272 To amend Chapter 33 of Subtitle II of Title 28 of the District of Columbia Official code 16
7373 to exercise the District’s right under the federal Depository Institutions 17
7474 Deregulation and Monetary Control Act to opt -out of the federal requirement that 18
7575 the District apply the interest rates of state- chartered federally insured banks , and 19
7676 to codify definitions of “lender” and “loan” to encompass loan transactions 20
7777 structured to evade District requirements. 21
7878 22
7979 BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 23
8080 24
8181 That this act may be cited as the “Protecting Affordable Loans Amendment Act of 2023”. 25
8282 26
8383 Sec. 2. Chapter 33 of Subtitle II of Title 28 of the District of Columbia Official 27
8484 Code is amended as follows: 28
8585 (a) The table of contents is amended by adding new section designations to read 29
8686 as follows: 30
8787 “§ 28-3311a. Lender defined. 31
8888 “§ 28-3311b. Loan defined. 32
8989 “§ 28- 3311c. Lendee defined. 33
9090 “§ 28-3311d. Territorial application.”. 34
9191 (b) Section 28- 3301 is amended by adding a new subsection (j) to read as follows: 35
9292 “(j) In accordance with section 525 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation 36 2
9393 and Monetary Control Act of 1980, approved March 31, 1980 (Pub. L. 96- 221; 94 Stat. 37
9494 161) (“DIDMCA”), it is hereby expressly provided that the District does not w ant the 38
9595 amendments made by section 521 of DIDMCA (12 U.S.C. § 1831d) to apply with respect 39
9696 to loans made in the District.” . 40
9797 (c) New sections 28-3311a, 28-3311b, and 28- 3311c are added to read as follows: 41
9898 “§ 28-3311a. Lender defined. 42
9999 “For the purposes of this chapter, the word “lender” means a person , including any 43
100100 affiliate or subsidiary of another legal entity, that offers or makes a loan, arranges or 44
101101 facilitates a loan for a third party, or acts as an agent for a third party in making or 45
102102 servicing a loan, including any person engaged in a transaction that is in substance a 46
103103 disguised loan or a subterfuge for the purpose of avoiding this chapter, regardless of 47
104104 whether or not the entity or person is subject to licensing, and that: 48
105105 “(a) Holds, acquires, or maintains, directly or indirectly, the whole , predominant, 49
106106 or partial economic interest , risk or reward in the loan; 50
107107 “(b) Markets, brokers, arranges, facilitates, or services the loan and holds or holds 51
108108 the right, requirement, or first right of refusal to acquire, the loan or a receivable or 52
109109 interest in the loan; or 53
110110 “(c) The totality of the circumstances indicate that the person is the lender and the 54
111111 transaction is structured to evade the requirements of this chapter . Circumstances that 55
112112 weigh in favor of a person being considered a lender include, but are not limited to , when 56
113113 the person: 57
114114 “(1) Indemnifies, insures, or protects an exempt entity for any costs or 58
115115 risks related to the loan; 59 3
116116 “(2) Predominantly designs, controls, or operates the loan program; 60
117117 “(3) Purports to act as an agent, service provider, or in another capacity for 61
118118 an exempt entity while acting directly as a lender in other states, or 62
119119 “(4) H olds the trademark or intellectual property rights in the brand, 63
120120 underwriting system, or other core aspects of the loan program.” 64
121121 “§ 28-3311b. L oan defined. 65
122122 “For the purposes of this chapter, the word “ loan” means m oney or credit 66
123123 provided to a consumer in exchange for the consumer’s agreement to a certain set of 67
124124 terms, including, but not limited to, any finance charges, interest, or other payments, 68
125125 closed-end and open- end credit, retail installment sales contracts, motor vehicle retail 69
126126 installment sales contracts, and any deferred deposit transactions.” 70
127127 “§ 28- 3311c. Lendee defined. 71
128128 “For the purposes of this chapter, the word “lendee” means any person who 72
129129 received a loan.” 73
130130 “§ 28-3311d. Territorial application. 74
131131 “A loan shall be considered as having been made in the District if the lendee is a 75
132132 resident of the District at the time the lender receives either a signed writing evidencing 76
133133 the transaction or modification, or a written or oral offer of the buyer, lessee, or debtor to 77
134134 enter into or modify the transaction.” . 78
135135 Sec. 3. Fiscal impact statement . 79
136136 The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the 80
137137 fiscal impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act 81
138138 of 1975, approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat. 2038; D.C. Official Code § 1- 301.47a). 82 4
139139 Sec. 4. Effective Date. 83
140140 This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto 84
141141 by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of 85
142142 congressional review as provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home 86
143143 Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-87
144144 206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of Columbia Register. 88