District Of Columbia 2023-2024 Regular Session

District Of Columbia Council Bill PR25-0842 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1- ENROLLED ORIGINAL
2-
3-
4-
5-
61
72 1
83
9-A RESOLUTION
10-
11-25-526
12-
13-IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
14-
15-June 11, 2024
16-
17-
18-To declare the existence of an emergency with respect to the need to amend Chapter 3 of Title 13
19-of the District of Columbia Official Code to provide that publication may be substituted
20-for personal service of process for appointments of a vulnerable youth guardian in certain
21-circumstances; and to amend Chapter 23 of Title 16 of the District of Columbia Official
22-Code to authorize the Family Division of the Superior Court to appoint, modify, and
23-terminate a new class of legal guardianship for vulnerable youth.
24-
25-RESOLVED, BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this
26-resolution may be cited as the “Vulnerable Youth Guardianship Protection Emergency
27-Declaration Resolution of 2024”.
28-
29-Sec. 2 (a) Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (“SIJS”) is a special humanitarian visa
30-established by the federal government covering abused, neglected, or abandoned immigrant
31-youth under age 21. If approved, those granted SIJS are authorized to work, maintain a Social
32-Security Number, receive assistance for housing and education, and eventually apply for lawful
33-permanent residency, making SIJS an important legal lifeline for vulnerable immigrant youth,
34-especially undocumented immigrant youth.
35-(b) Under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(27)(J), to apply for a SIJS visa, an applicant must be an
36-unmarried noncitizen under 21 years of age, be presently residing in the United States, and
37-possess a juvenile court order from a state court. The court order must find that:
38-(1) The petitioner is dependent on the court or under custody of a state agency,
39-department, or court-appointed guardian;
40-(2) The petitioner has suffered from abuse, neglect, abandonment, or other related
41-reason that makes reunification with the petitioner’s parents impossible; and
42-(3) It is in the best interest of the petitioner not to return to the previous country of
43-nationality or the country of the last habitual residence of the petitioner or of the petitioner’s
44-parents. ENROLLED ORIGINAL
45-
46-
47-
48-
49-
4+ ____________________________ 1
5+Councilmember Brooke Pinto 2
6+ 3
7+ 4
8+A PROPOSED RESOLUTION 5
9+ 6
10+___________ 7
11+ 8
12+IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 9
13+ 10
14+ ______________ 11
15+ 12
16+To declare the existence of an emergency with respect to the need to amend Chapter 3 of Title 13 13
17+of the District of Columbia Official Code to provide that publication may be substituted 14
18+for personal service of process for appointments of a vulnerable youth guardian in certain 15
19+circumstances; and to amend Chapter 23 of Title 16 of the District of Columbia Official 16
20+Code to authorize the Family Division of the Superior Court to appoint, modify, and 17
21+terminate a new class of legal guardianship for vulnerable youth. 18
22+ 19
23+RESOLVED, BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this 20
24+resolution may be cited as the “Vulnerable Youth Guardianship Protection Emergency 21
25+Declaration Resolution of 2024”. 22
26+Sec. 2 (a) Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (“SIJS”) is a special humanitarian visa 23
27+established by the federal government covering abused, neglected, or abandoned immigrant 24
28+youth under age 21. If approved, those granted SIJS are authorized to work, maintain a Social 25
29+Security Number, receive assistance for housing and education, and eventually apply for lawful 26
30+permanent residency, making SIJS an important legal lifeline for vulnerable immigrant youth, 27
31+especially undocumented immigrant youth. 28
32+(b) Under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(27)(J), to apply for a SIJS visa, an applicant must be an 29
33+unmarried noncitizen under 21 years of age, be presently residing in the United States, and 30
34+possess a juvenile court order from a state court. The court order must find that: 31
5035 2
5136
52-(c) Despite the intended reach of this humanitarian visa, a number of eligible immigrant
53-youth in the District may be unable to access these critical protections due to an inconsistency
54-between District law and federal law. Under current District law, the Superior Court of the
55-District of Columbia lacks authority over unmarried noncitizens who are at least 18 but younger
56-than 21 that would be consistent with federal SIJS petition requirements. Specifically, the court
57-does not have authority over these youth except in certain extremely limited circumstances, such
58-as the youth being under the care of the Child and Family Service Agency or being legally found
59-to have been subjected to neglect.
60-(d) Because the court’s authority over unmarried noncitizens who are at least age 18 but
61-younger than 21 is limited, the court has no legal mechanism to issue the orders necessary to
62-allow a number of eligible youth to apply for SIJS, even though federally SIJS petitioners are
63-allowed to petition until the age of 21. The court also lacks the necessary authority to appoint
64-guardians to unmarried noncitizens who are at least age 18 but younger than 21, which can be a
65-necessary component of the SIJS petition. This lack of authority prevents many immigrant youth
66-in the District (and in particular undocumented immigrant youth) who have suffered from abuse,
67-abandonment, or neglect from obtaining relief from that past mistreatment by accessing these
68-critical federal protections as intended.
69-(e) There is a pressing need to address the lack of access to federal protections and lack
70-of accessible guardianship appointments for immigrant youth, one of the District’s most
71-vulnerable populations. Child welfare organizations, advocacy groups, and experts testified at the
72-Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety’s June 8, 2023, hearing on the Vulnerable Youth
73-Guardianship Protection Amendment Act of 2023, as introduced on January 19, 2023 (Bill 25-
74-44) (“permanent bill”), that immigrant youth without the critical supports of guardianship are
75-especially vulnerable to abuses such as human trafficking and housing insecurity. SIJS visas
76-allow for the material benefits of access to employment, the procurement of a Social Security
77-number, healthcare, assistance with housing and education, and eventually the possibility of
78-applying for lawful permanent residency. The stability and safety that SIJS affords immigrant
79-youth also fosters their emotional, psychological, and physical well-being by providing them
80-with a stable and supportive schooling environment, community, and household. With the
81-protections of a court appointed guardian, youth will not be forced to move from their friends
82-and communities to other jurisdictions to try to access SIJS protections. SIJS thus importantly
83-shields immigrant youth from emotional and psychological suffering, exploitation and abuse,
84-involvement in illegal activity, material instability, and housing insecurity. Advocates testified
85-that they must turn away several youths on a monthly basis because of this ongoing
86-misalignment in District and federal law and that even eligible youth close to the cutoff age of 18
87-find it difficult to obtain a pro bono attorney with the expertise to rapidly prepare and file the
88-necessary legal documents. ENROLLED ORIGINAL
89-
90-
91-
92-
93-
37+(1) The petitioner is dependent on the court or under custody of a state agency, 32
38+department, or court-appointed guardian; 33
39+(2) The petitioner has suffered from abuse, neglect, abandonment, or other related 34
40+reason that makes reunification with the petitioner’s parents impossible; and 35
41+(3) It is in the best interest of the petitioner not to return to the previous country of 36
42+nationality or the country of the last habitual residence of the petitioner or of the petitioner’s 37
43+parents. 38
44+(c) Despite the intended reach of this humanitarian visa, a number of eligible immigrant 39
45+youth in the District may be unable to access these critical protections due to an inconsistency 40
46+between District law and federal law. Under current District law, the Superior Court of the 41
47+District of Columbia lacks authority over unmarried noncitizens who are at least 18 but younger 42
48+than 21 that would be consistent with federal SIJS petition requirements. Specifically, the court 43
49+does not have authority over these youth except in certain extremely limited circumstances, such 44
50+as the youth being under the care of the Child and Family Service Agency or being legally found 45
51+to have been subjected to neglect. 46
52+(d) Because the court’s authority over unmarried noncitizens who are at least age 18 but 47
53+younger than 21 is limited, the court has no legal mechanism to issue the orders necessary to 48
54+allow a number of eligible youth to apply for SIJS, even though federally SIJS petitioners are 49
55+allowed to petition until the age of 21. The court also lacks the necessary authority to appoint 50
56+guardians to unmarried noncitizens who are at least age 18 but younger than 21, which can be a 51
57+necessary component of the SIJS petition. This lack of authority prevents many immigrant youth 52
58+in the District (and in particular undocumented immigrant youth) who have suffered from abuse, 53
9459 3
9560
96-(f) It is estimated that more than one third of unaccompanied immigrant youth coming to
97-the United States have already reached 17 years of age, meaning that when these youth arrive in
98-the District they are already on the verge of aging out of Superior Court authority should they
99-wish to seek federal relief under SIJS while residing in the District. This misalignment between
100-the District and federal law means that, absent Council action, a class of vulnerable District
101-immigrant youth will be unable to seek legal relief afforded to them by federal law and will be
102-unable to seek the care and support of a guardianship appointment while living in the District.
103-(g) On September 19, 2023, the Council passed the Vulnerable Youth Guardianship
104-Protection Temporary Amendment Act of 2023, effective November 28, 2023 (D.C. Law 25-91;
105-70 DCR 13754) (“temporary law”), which will expire on July 10, 2024. The permanent version
106-of the temporary law is currently undergoing congressional review. This emergency legislation is
107-necessary to fill the gap between the expiration of the temporary law and the effective date of the
108-permanent act.
109-(h) This emergency bill mirrors the permanent version of the bill in incorporating minor
110-technical changes and one substantive change not included in the expiring temporary law,
111-namely the elimination of fees for filing guardianship petitions.
61+abandonment, or neglect from obtaining relief from that past mistreatment by accessing these 54
62+critical federal protections as intended. 55
63+(e) There is a pressing need to address the lack of access to federal protections and lack 56
64+of accessible guardianship appointments for immigrant youth, one of the District’s most 57
65+vulnerable populations. Child welfare organizations, advocacy groups, and experts testified at the 58
66+Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety’s June 8, 2023, hearing on the Vulnerable Youth 59
67+Guardianship Protection Amendment Act of 2023, as introduced on January 19, 2023 (Bill 25-60
68+44) (“permanent bill”), that immigrant youth without the critical supports of guardianship are 61
69+especially vulnerable to abuses such as human trafficking and housing insecurity. SIJS visas 62
70+allow for the material benefits of access to employment, the procurement of a Social Security 63
71+number, healthcare, assistance with housing and education, and eventually the possibility of 64
72+applying for lawful permanent residency. The stability and safety that SIJS affords immigrant 65
73+youth also fosters their emotional, psychological, and physical well-being by providing them 66
74+with a stable and supportive schooling environment, community, and household. With the 67
75+protections of a court appointed guardian, youth will not be forced to move from their friends 68
76+and communities to other jurisdictions to try to access SIJS protections. SIJS thus importantly 69
77+shields immigrant youth from emotional and psychological suffering, exploitation and abuse, 70
78+involvement in illegal activity, material instability, and housing insecurity. Advocates testified 71
79+that they must turn away several youths on a monthly basis because of this ongoing 72
80+misalignment in District and federal law and that even eligible youth close to the cutoff age of 18 73
81+find it difficult to obtain a pro bono attorney with the expertise to rapidly prepare and file the 74
82+necessary legal documents. 75
83+4
11284
113-Sec. 3. The Council determines that the circumstances enumerated in section 2 constitute
114-emergency circumstances making it necessary that the Vulnerable Youth Guardianship
115-Protection Emergency Amendment Act of 2024 be adopted after a single reading.
116-
117-Sec. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately.
118-
119-
120-
121-
122-
123-
85+(f) It is estimated that more than one third of unaccompanied immigrant youth coming to 76
86+the United States have already reached 17 years of age , meaning that when these youth arrive in 77
87+the District they are already on the verge of aging out of Superior Court authority should they 78
88+wish to seek federal relief under SIJS while residing in the District. This misalignment between 79
89+the District and federal law means that, absent Council action, a class of vulnerable District 80
90+immigrant youth will be unable to seek legal relief afforded to them by federal law and will be 81
91+unable to seek the care and support of a guardianship appointment while living in the District. 82
92+(g) On July 11, 2023, the Council passed emergency and temporary versions of the 83
93+Vulnerable Youth Guardianship Protection Amendment Act of 2023. The temporary law (D.C. 84
94+Act 25-227; 70 DCR 13754), is due to expire on July 10, 2024. The Council passed a permanent 85
95+version, Bill 25- 44, on May 7, 2024; the Mayor signed the bill on May 29, 2024. The permanent 86
96+version is currently undergoing congressional review. Since congressional review will not be 87
97+complete prior to the temporary law without new emergency legislation, there will likely be a 88
98+gap in the law. As a result, emergency legislation is necessary to fill the gap. 89
99+(h) This emergency bill mirrors the permanent version of the bill in incorporating minor 90
100+technical tweaks and one substantive change not included in the expiring temporary law, namely 91
101+the elimination of fees for filing guardianship petitions. 92
102+Sec. 3. The Council determines that the circumstances enumerated in section 2 constitute 93
103+emergency circumstances making it necessary that the Vulnerable Youth Guardianship 94
104+Protection Emergency Amendment Act of 2024 be adopted after a single reading. 95
105+Sec. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately. 96