9 | | - | A RESOLUTION |
---|
10 | | - | |
---|
11 | | - | 25-526 |
---|
12 | | - | |
---|
13 | | - | IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
---|
14 | | - | |
---|
15 | | - | June 11, 2024 |
---|
16 | | - | |
---|
17 | | - | |
---|
18 | | - | To declare the existence of an emergency with respect to the need to amend Chapter 3 of Title 13 |
---|
19 | | - | of the District of Columbia Official Code to provide that publication may be substituted |
---|
20 | | - | for personal service of process for appointments of a vulnerable youth guardian in certain |
---|
21 | | - | circumstances; and to amend Chapter 23 of Title 16 of the District of Columbia Official |
---|
22 | | - | Code to authorize the Family Division of the Superior Court to appoint, modify, and |
---|
23 | | - | terminate a new class of legal guardianship for vulnerable youth. |
---|
24 | | - | |
---|
25 | | - | RESOLVED, BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this |
---|
26 | | - | resolution may be cited as the “Vulnerable Youth Guardianship Protection Emergency |
---|
27 | | - | Declaration Resolution of 2024”. |
---|
28 | | - | |
---|
29 | | - | Sec. 2 (a) Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (“SIJS”) is a special humanitarian visa |
---|
30 | | - | established by the federal government covering abused, neglected, or abandoned immigrant |
---|
31 | | - | youth under age 21. If approved, those granted SIJS are authorized to work, maintain a Social |
---|
32 | | - | Security Number, receive assistance for housing and education, and eventually apply for lawful |
---|
33 | | - | permanent residency, making SIJS an important legal lifeline for vulnerable immigrant youth, |
---|
34 | | - | especially undocumented immigrant youth. |
---|
35 | | - | (b) Under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(27)(J), to apply for a SIJS visa, an applicant must be an |
---|
36 | | - | unmarried noncitizen under 21 years of age, be presently residing in the United States, and |
---|
37 | | - | possess a juvenile court order from a state court. The court order must find that: |
---|
38 | | - | (1) The petitioner is dependent on the court or under custody of a state agency, |
---|
39 | | - | department, or court-appointed guardian; |
---|
40 | | - | (2) The petitioner has suffered from abuse, neglect, abandonment, or other related |
---|
41 | | - | reason that makes reunification with the petitioner’s parents impossible; and |
---|
42 | | - | (3) It is in the best interest of the petitioner not to return to the previous country of |
---|
43 | | - | nationality or the country of the last habitual residence of the petitioner or of the petitioner’s |
---|
44 | | - | parents. ENROLLED ORIGINAL |
---|
45 | | - | |
---|
46 | | - | |
---|
47 | | - | |
---|
48 | | - | |
---|
49 | | - | |
---|
| 4 | + | ____________________________ 1 |
---|
| 5 | + | Councilmember Brooke Pinto 2 |
---|
| 6 | + | 3 |
---|
| 7 | + | 4 |
---|
| 8 | + | A PROPOSED RESOLUTION 5 |
---|
| 9 | + | 6 |
---|
| 10 | + | ___________ 7 |
---|
| 11 | + | 8 |
---|
| 12 | + | IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 9 |
---|
| 13 | + | 10 |
---|
| 14 | + | ______________ 11 |
---|
| 15 | + | 12 |
---|
| 16 | + | To declare the existence of an emergency with respect to the need to amend Chapter 3 of Title 13 13 |
---|
| 17 | + | of the District of Columbia Official Code to provide that publication may be substituted 14 |
---|
| 18 | + | for personal service of process for appointments of a vulnerable youth guardian in certain 15 |
---|
| 19 | + | circumstances; and to amend Chapter 23 of Title 16 of the District of Columbia Official 16 |
---|
| 20 | + | Code to authorize the Family Division of the Superior Court to appoint, modify, and 17 |
---|
| 21 | + | terminate a new class of legal guardianship for vulnerable youth. 18 |
---|
| 22 | + | 19 |
---|
| 23 | + | RESOLVED, BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this 20 |
---|
| 24 | + | resolution may be cited as the “Vulnerable Youth Guardianship Protection Emergency 21 |
---|
| 25 | + | Declaration Resolution of 2024”. 22 |
---|
| 26 | + | Sec. 2 (a) Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (“SIJS”) is a special humanitarian visa 23 |
---|
| 27 | + | established by the federal government covering abused, neglected, or abandoned immigrant 24 |
---|
| 28 | + | youth under age 21. If approved, those granted SIJS are authorized to work, maintain a Social 25 |
---|
| 29 | + | Security Number, receive assistance for housing and education, and eventually apply for lawful 26 |
---|
| 30 | + | permanent residency, making SIJS an important legal lifeline for vulnerable immigrant youth, 27 |
---|
| 31 | + | especially undocumented immigrant youth. 28 |
---|
| 32 | + | (b) Under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(27)(J), to apply for a SIJS visa, an applicant must be an 29 |
---|
| 33 | + | unmarried noncitizen under 21 years of age, be presently residing in the United States, and 30 |
---|
| 34 | + | possess a juvenile court order from a state court. The court order must find that: 31 |
---|
52 | | - | (c) Despite the intended reach of this humanitarian visa, a number of eligible immigrant |
---|
53 | | - | youth in the District may be unable to access these critical protections due to an inconsistency |
---|
54 | | - | between District law and federal law. Under current District law, the Superior Court of the |
---|
55 | | - | District of Columbia lacks authority over unmarried noncitizens who are at least 18 but younger |
---|
56 | | - | than 21 that would be consistent with federal SIJS petition requirements. Specifically, the court |
---|
57 | | - | does not have authority over these youth except in certain extremely limited circumstances, such |
---|
58 | | - | as the youth being under the care of the Child and Family Service Agency or being legally found |
---|
59 | | - | to have been subjected to neglect. |
---|
60 | | - | (d) Because the court’s authority over unmarried noncitizens who are at least age 18 but |
---|
61 | | - | younger than 21 is limited, the court has no legal mechanism to issue the orders necessary to |
---|
62 | | - | allow a number of eligible youth to apply for SIJS, even though federally SIJS petitioners are |
---|
63 | | - | allowed to petition until the age of 21. The court also lacks the necessary authority to appoint |
---|
64 | | - | guardians to unmarried noncitizens who are at least age 18 but younger than 21, which can be a |
---|
65 | | - | necessary component of the SIJS petition. This lack of authority prevents many immigrant youth |
---|
66 | | - | in the District (and in particular undocumented immigrant youth) who have suffered from abuse, |
---|
67 | | - | abandonment, or neglect from obtaining relief from that past mistreatment by accessing these |
---|
68 | | - | critical federal protections as intended. |
---|
69 | | - | (e) There is a pressing need to address the lack of access to federal protections and lack |
---|
70 | | - | of accessible guardianship appointments for immigrant youth, one of the District’s most |
---|
71 | | - | vulnerable populations. Child welfare organizations, advocacy groups, and experts testified at the |
---|
72 | | - | Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety’s June 8, 2023, hearing on the Vulnerable Youth |
---|
73 | | - | Guardianship Protection Amendment Act of 2023, as introduced on January 19, 2023 (Bill 25- |
---|
74 | | - | 44) (“permanent bill”), that immigrant youth without the critical supports of guardianship are |
---|
75 | | - | especially vulnerable to abuses such as human trafficking and housing insecurity. SIJS visas |
---|
76 | | - | allow for the material benefits of access to employment, the procurement of a Social Security |
---|
77 | | - | number, healthcare, assistance with housing and education, and eventually the possibility of |
---|
78 | | - | applying for lawful permanent residency. The stability and safety that SIJS affords immigrant |
---|
79 | | - | youth also fosters their emotional, psychological, and physical well-being by providing them |
---|
80 | | - | with a stable and supportive schooling environment, community, and household. With the |
---|
81 | | - | protections of a court appointed guardian, youth will not be forced to move from their friends |
---|
82 | | - | and communities to other jurisdictions to try to access SIJS protections. SIJS thus importantly |
---|
83 | | - | shields immigrant youth from emotional and psychological suffering, exploitation and abuse, |
---|
84 | | - | involvement in illegal activity, material instability, and housing insecurity. Advocates testified |
---|
85 | | - | that they must turn away several youths on a monthly basis because of this ongoing |
---|
86 | | - | misalignment in District and federal law and that even eligible youth close to the cutoff age of 18 |
---|
87 | | - | find it difficult to obtain a pro bono attorney with the expertise to rapidly prepare and file the |
---|
88 | | - | necessary legal documents. ENROLLED ORIGINAL |
---|
89 | | - | |
---|
90 | | - | |
---|
91 | | - | |
---|
92 | | - | |
---|
93 | | - | |
---|
| 37 | + | (1) The petitioner is dependent on the court or under custody of a state agency, 32 |
---|
| 38 | + | department, or court-appointed guardian; 33 |
---|
| 39 | + | (2) The petitioner has suffered from abuse, neglect, abandonment, or other related 34 |
---|
| 40 | + | reason that makes reunification with the petitioner’s parents impossible; and 35 |
---|
| 41 | + | (3) It is in the best interest of the petitioner not to return to the previous country of 36 |
---|
| 42 | + | nationality or the country of the last habitual residence of the petitioner or of the petitioner’s 37 |
---|
| 43 | + | parents. 38 |
---|
| 44 | + | (c) Despite the intended reach of this humanitarian visa, a number of eligible immigrant 39 |
---|
| 45 | + | youth in the District may be unable to access these critical protections due to an inconsistency 40 |
---|
| 46 | + | between District law and federal law. Under current District law, the Superior Court of the 41 |
---|
| 47 | + | District of Columbia lacks authority over unmarried noncitizens who are at least 18 but younger 42 |
---|
| 48 | + | than 21 that would be consistent with federal SIJS petition requirements. Specifically, the court 43 |
---|
| 49 | + | does not have authority over these youth except in certain extremely limited circumstances, such 44 |
---|
| 50 | + | as the youth being under the care of the Child and Family Service Agency or being legally found 45 |
---|
| 51 | + | to have been subjected to neglect. 46 |
---|
| 52 | + | (d) Because the court’s authority over unmarried noncitizens who are at least age 18 but 47 |
---|
| 53 | + | younger than 21 is limited, the court has no legal mechanism to issue the orders necessary to 48 |
---|
| 54 | + | allow a number of eligible youth to apply for SIJS, even though federally SIJS petitioners are 49 |
---|
| 55 | + | allowed to petition until the age of 21. The court also lacks the necessary authority to appoint 50 |
---|
| 56 | + | guardians to unmarried noncitizens who are at least age 18 but younger than 21, which can be a 51 |
---|
| 57 | + | necessary component of the SIJS petition. This lack of authority prevents many immigrant youth 52 |
---|
| 58 | + | in the District (and in particular undocumented immigrant youth) who have suffered from abuse, 53 |
---|
96 | | - | (f) It is estimated that more than one third of unaccompanied immigrant youth coming to |
---|
97 | | - | the United States have already reached 17 years of age, meaning that when these youth arrive in |
---|
98 | | - | the District they are already on the verge of aging out of Superior Court authority should they |
---|
99 | | - | wish to seek federal relief under SIJS while residing in the District. This misalignment between |
---|
100 | | - | the District and federal law means that, absent Council action, a class of vulnerable District |
---|
101 | | - | immigrant youth will be unable to seek legal relief afforded to them by federal law and will be |
---|
102 | | - | unable to seek the care and support of a guardianship appointment while living in the District. |
---|
103 | | - | (g) On September 19, 2023, the Council passed the Vulnerable Youth Guardianship |
---|
104 | | - | Protection Temporary Amendment Act of 2023, effective November 28, 2023 (D.C. Law 25-91; |
---|
105 | | - | 70 DCR 13754) (“temporary law”), which will expire on July 10, 2024. The permanent version |
---|
106 | | - | of the temporary law is currently undergoing congressional review. This emergency legislation is |
---|
107 | | - | necessary to fill the gap between the expiration of the temporary law and the effective date of the |
---|
108 | | - | permanent act. |
---|
109 | | - | (h) This emergency bill mirrors the permanent version of the bill in incorporating minor |
---|
110 | | - | technical changes and one substantive change not included in the expiring temporary law, |
---|
111 | | - | namely the elimination of fees for filing guardianship petitions. |
---|
| 61 | + | abandonment, or neglect from obtaining relief from that past mistreatment by accessing these 54 |
---|
| 62 | + | critical federal protections as intended. 55 |
---|
| 63 | + | (e) There is a pressing need to address the lack of access to federal protections and lack 56 |
---|
| 64 | + | of accessible guardianship appointments for immigrant youth, one of the District’s most 57 |
---|
| 65 | + | vulnerable populations. Child welfare organizations, advocacy groups, and experts testified at the 58 |
---|
| 66 | + | Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety’s June 8, 2023, hearing on the Vulnerable Youth 59 |
---|
| 67 | + | Guardianship Protection Amendment Act of 2023, as introduced on January 19, 2023 (Bill 25-60 |
---|
| 68 | + | 44) (“permanent bill”), that immigrant youth without the critical supports of guardianship are 61 |
---|
| 69 | + | especially vulnerable to abuses such as human trafficking and housing insecurity. SIJS visas 62 |
---|
| 70 | + | allow for the material benefits of access to employment, the procurement of a Social Security 63 |
---|
| 71 | + | number, healthcare, assistance with housing and education, and eventually the possibility of 64 |
---|
| 72 | + | applying for lawful permanent residency. The stability and safety that SIJS affords immigrant 65 |
---|
| 73 | + | youth also fosters their emotional, psychological, and physical well-being by providing them 66 |
---|
| 74 | + | with a stable and supportive schooling environment, community, and household. With the 67 |
---|
| 75 | + | protections of a court appointed guardian, youth will not be forced to move from their friends 68 |
---|
| 76 | + | and communities to other jurisdictions to try to access SIJS protections. SIJS thus importantly 69 |
---|
| 77 | + | shields immigrant youth from emotional and psychological suffering, exploitation and abuse, 70 |
---|
| 78 | + | involvement in illegal activity, material instability, and housing insecurity. Advocates testified 71 |
---|
| 79 | + | that they must turn away several youths on a monthly basis because of this ongoing 72 |
---|
| 80 | + | misalignment in District and federal law and that even eligible youth close to the cutoff age of 18 73 |
---|
| 81 | + | find it difficult to obtain a pro bono attorney with the expertise to rapidly prepare and file the 74 |
---|
| 82 | + | necessary legal documents. 75 |
---|
| 83 | + | 4 |
---|
113 | | - | Sec. 3. The Council determines that the circumstances enumerated in section 2 constitute |
---|
114 | | - | emergency circumstances making it necessary that the Vulnerable Youth Guardianship |
---|
115 | | - | Protection Emergency Amendment Act of 2024 be adopted after a single reading. |
---|
116 | | - | |
---|
117 | | - | Sec. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately. |
---|
118 | | - | |
---|
119 | | - | |
---|
120 | | - | |
---|
121 | | - | |
---|
122 | | - | |
---|
123 | | - | |
---|
| 85 | + | (f) It is estimated that more than one third of unaccompanied immigrant youth coming to 76 |
---|
| 86 | + | the United States have already reached 17 years of age , meaning that when these youth arrive in 77 |
---|
| 87 | + | the District they are already on the verge of aging out of Superior Court authority should they 78 |
---|
| 88 | + | wish to seek federal relief under SIJS while residing in the District. This misalignment between 79 |
---|
| 89 | + | the District and federal law means that, absent Council action, a class of vulnerable District 80 |
---|
| 90 | + | immigrant youth will be unable to seek legal relief afforded to them by federal law and will be 81 |
---|
| 91 | + | unable to seek the care and support of a guardianship appointment while living in the District. 82 |
---|
| 92 | + | (g) On July 11, 2023, the Council passed emergency and temporary versions of the 83 |
---|
| 93 | + | Vulnerable Youth Guardianship Protection Amendment Act of 2023. The temporary law (D.C. 84 |
---|
| 94 | + | Act 25-227; 70 DCR 13754), is due to expire on July 10, 2024. The Council passed a permanent 85 |
---|
| 95 | + | version, Bill 25- 44, on May 7, 2024; the Mayor signed the bill on May 29, 2024. The permanent 86 |
---|
| 96 | + | version is currently undergoing congressional review. Since congressional review will not be 87 |
---|
| 97 | + | complete prior to the temporary law without new emergency legislation, there will likely be a 88 |
---|
| 98 | + | gap in the law. As a result, emergency legislation is necessary to fill the gap. 89 |
---|
| 99 | + | (h) This emergency bill mirrors the permanent version of the bill in incorporating minor 90 |
---|
| 100 | + | technical tweaks and one substantive change not included in the expiring temporary law, namely 91 |
---|
| 101 | + | the elimination of fees for filing guardianship petitions. 92 |
---|
| 102 | + | Sec. 3. The Council determines that the circumstances enumerated in section 2 constitute 93 |
---|
| 103 | + | emergency circumstances making it necessary that the Vulnerable Youth Guardianship 94 |
---|
| 104 | + | Protection Emergency Amendment Act of 2024 be adopted after a single reading. 95 |
---|
| 105 | + | Sec. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately. 96 |
---|