Delaware House Bill HB160

Delaware 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/16/23
• Engrossed: 6/20/23
• Enrolled: 6/28/23
• Refer: 6/20/23
• Passed: 8/16/23

Caption

An Act To Amend Title 16 Of The Delaware Code Relating To 988 Behavioral Health Crisis Intervention Services.

Impact

The legislation addresses the fragmented nature of Delaware's current mental health service provision, which has been criticized for being underfunded and difficult to access. By instituting a robust funding mechanism through the surcharge, it aims to create parity with 911 services, ensuring that Delawareans have reliable access to mental health crisis interventions at any time. It will necessitate cooperation between multiple stakeholders, including emergency response and health services, in delivering timely and effective support during crises. The bill also outlines the responsibilities of the Behavioral Health Crisis Services Board to report on the effectiveness and financial management of the fund, encouraging transparency and accountability.

Summary

House Bill 160 aims to enhance Delaware's response to mental health crises by establishing a comprehensive crisis intervention services framework. The bill creates the Behavioral Health Crisis Services Board to oversee the implementation of this framework and aims to ensure that individuals experiencing behavioral health crises have access to appropriate resources and services. It is particularly focused on facilitating telecommunication accessibility through the creation of a dedicated Behavioral Health Crisis Intervention Services Fund, which will be funded by a newly imposed surcharge on various telecommunications services. This surcharge is set at 60 cents per month for each phone line and a one-time fee for prepaid services, paralleling the existing E-911 surcharge structure.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 160 appears largely supportive among legislators and mental health advocates, who emphasize the need for a systematic and adequately funded approach to crisis intervention services. While there is widespread recognition of the urgent necessity to address mental health issues exacerbated by factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic, there is also some concern expressed over the implementation of the surcharge, particularly about how it may impact consumers. Overall, the prevailing view among proponents is that this bill will significantly enhance the safety and well-being of those facing mental health challenges in the state.

Contention

Notably, points of contention surrounding HB 160 include the potential financial burden on consumers due to the newly established surcharge and the regulation of its application to different service providers. Some stakeholders question the efficacy of funding through surcharges, voicing concerns about fairness and accessibility, particularly for low-income individuals who may rely on prepaid services. Additionally, the restructuring of existing mental health service frameworks may invite scrutiny regarding operational effectiveness and responsiveness to diverse community needs, which must be carefully managed as the bill is implemented.