AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 29; Title 7; Title 33; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline.
The implementation of SB1789 is expected to create a structured approach to crisis intervention, establishing a dedicated fund supported by a telecommunications service surcharge. This surcharge will be levied on subscribers, with the revenue directed towards maintaining and improving 988 and related services. The establishment of a board to oversee these activities is also a significant move towards enhancing the state’s responsiveness to behavioral health crises. Overall, the bill facilitates a systemic response aimed at reducing the burden on emergency services and ensuring individuals experiencing crises receive appropriate interventions.
SB1789 is a legislative measure designed to enhance the provision of behavioral health crisis intervention services in Tennessee through the establishment of a support framework for the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. The bill aims to amend multiple titles within the Tennessee Code Annotated to provide clear definitions and guidelines associated with behavioral health conditions, crisis interventions, and the role of various participants such as providers, mobile crisis teams, and the newly created behavioral health crisis intervention services board. This board is tasked with developing a comprehensive plan to administer the 988 service effectively and sustainably.
General sentiment around SB1789 appears to be supportive, as it aims to address critical gaps in behavioral health services. Stakeholders, including behavioral health advocates, have expressed optimism about the potential for improved access to crisis intervention services. However, there may be concerns regarding the financial implications of the surcharge on consumers and the effectiveness of fund management. Stakeholders will likely monitor how these funds are utilized to ensure they align with the intended purpose of enhancing crisis response capabilities.
While the bill has garnered support as a progressive measure for mental health advocacy, there may be points of contention regarding the financial burden placed on telecommunications subscribers. Additionally, discussions may arise related to the adequacy of the proposed operational standards and the transparency of the board's activities. Ensuring accountability in how the funds are administered and the services provided will be crucial for maintaining public trust and achieving the bill’s goals.