Delaware 2023-2024 Regular Session

Delaware Senate Bill SB51

Introduced
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/17/23  
Engrossed
4/6/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Engrossed
4/6/23  
Enrolled
6/22/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Enrolled
6/27/23  
Enrolled
6/22/23  
Passed
8/22/23  
Enrolled
6/27/23  

Caption

An Act To Amend Title 16 Of The Delaware Code Relating To The Use Of Single-service Plastic Implements And Polystyrene Containers In Food Establishments.

Impact

If enacted, SB51 would have a significant impact on state regulations regarding food service packaging. It would prohibit food establishments from providing certain plastic items such as beverage stirrers, cocktail picks, and plastic straws unless specific conditions are met, such as consumer request. Additionally, polystyrene foam food service packaging would be banned for ready-to-eat food. This measure aims to promote the use of recyclable or compostable alternatives, thus encouraging a shift towards environmentally responsible practices in the food service industry.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 51 seeks to amend Title 16 of the Delaware Code by introducing restrictions on the use of single-service plastic implements and polystyrene containers in food establishments. The bill was proposed in response to the increasing environmental concerns regarding litter caused by single-use plastics. It emphasizes the need for environmental sustainability by addressing the substantial contribution of such materials to waste and pollution in public spaces across Delaware.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB51 is largely positive among environmental advocates and some legislators who argue that the bill is a necessary step towards reducing waste and protecting local ecosystems. Supporters highlight the importance of such legislation in reducing pollution and fostering a healthier environment. Conversely, opponents express concerns over potential inconveniences for businesses, particularly regarding the cost and practicality of transitioning to alternative packaging materials.

Contention

The main points of contention surrounding the bill include potential economic implications for food establishments required to adapt to new packaging regulations and the feasibility of readily available alternative materials. While proponents see this as a move towards sustainable practices, critics argue that it may create unnecessary burdens on small businesses. Furthermore, the nuances of how exemptions, such as those for healthcare providers and pre-packaged food, are applied could lead to debates over compliance and enforcement measures.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2921

Expanded Polystyrene Food Service Packaging Recovery and Recycling Act.

CA SB705

Solid waste: expanded polystyrene food service containers.

AZ SB1359

Polystyrene foam food packaging; prohibition

AZ SB1101

Polystyrene foam food packaging; prohibition

CA SB378

State parks: state beaches: expanded polystyrene food container and cooler ban.

MA H912

To reduce polystyrene in the environment

CA AB2916

Environmental health: floating devices: expanded polystyrene.

MA S629

To reduce polystyrene in the environment