Requesting An Assessment Of The Feasibility Of Using Surplus Real Property Owned By The State For The Development Of Affordable Housing.
If implemented, the resolution mandates the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), in collaboration with other state agencies, to evaluate the potential of surplus properties for housing initiatives. By the end of 2023, the OMB is required to deliver a report that details its findings, including a comprehensive inventory of these properties, their zoning statuses, and recommendations for their use. This legislative move aims to enhance the existing legal framework regarding the state's approach to real estate management and affordable housing solutions.
SCR89, known as the Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 89, calls for an assessment of the feasibility of utilizing surplus real property owned by the State of Delaware for the development of affordable housing. This resolution emerges in response to a significant shortage of affordable housing units in Delaware, with the National Low Income Housing Coalition estimating a gap of over 21,000 units. The resolution highlights the critical need for state action to address this pressing issue, especially as the number of individuals experiencing homelessness in Delaware has notably more than doubled between 2020 and 2022.
The sentiment surrounding SCR89 is largely favorable among housing advocates and policymakers concerned about the housing crisis in Delaware. Supporters of the resolution view it as a necessary step toward addressing urgent housing needs by leveraging state-owned assets. However, there may be underlying concerns regarding the execution of such assessments and the potential bureaucratic delays that can arise in state projects.
While SCR89 presents a proactive approach to tackling housing shortages, potential points of contention could arise regarding the management of surplus properties. Stakeholders may debate the specific criteria for property selection, disposition process, and whether the evaluation would adequately prioritize properties that serve the most significant needs in the community. Additionally, discussions may emerge about how to balance development with environmental concerns, zoning laws, and community input in the construction of new housing.