Florida 2022 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0357

Introduced
10/19/21  
Refer
11/5/21  
Refer
11/5/21  
Refer
11/5/21  
Engrossed
2/25/22  
Refer
2/25/22  
Engrossed
3/3/22  

Caption

Pharmacies and Pharmacy Benefit Managers

Impact

If enacted, HB 357 will significantly alter the auditing landscape for pharmacies by ensuring that they receive prior notification of audits and by formalizing their rights to contest audit findings. This legislation also stipulates that health insurers and maintenance organizations remain responsible for the actions of pharmacy benefit managers that audit pharmacies, which may influence the dynamics between these entities rather than allowing pharmacy benefit managers to operate with impunity.

Summary

House Bill 357 focuses on the regulation of pharmacies and pharmacy benefit managers in Florida, with a particular emphasis on the rights of pharmacies during audits conducted by health insurers or managed care organizations. This bill outlines specific requirements for auditors including notice provisions and timelines while granting pharmacies the right to appeal audit findings. The proposed changes aim to create a clearer framework for how audits are conducted and how pharmacies must be treated during these processes, ensuring they are treated fairly and can address any discrepancies.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 357 appears to be largely supportive among pharmacy professionals and advocates advocating for fair treatment in the auditing process. By enhancing the rights of pharmacies, proponents believe this will help protect against unfair practices during audits. However, there may be concerns raised by health insurers who face increased obligations and potential liabilities under the bill, indicating some contention regarding the balance of responsibilities between pharmacies and their auditors.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the increased responsibilities placed on health insurers, who must now guarantee compliance with the new auditing requirements and potential penalties for pharmacy benefit managers. Critics may view this move as a burden that could complicate audit processes or lead to increased costs for pharmacies and insurers alike. The effectiveness of the appeal process for pharmacy audit findings may also be scrutinized, questioning whether it genuinely provides a fair opportunity for pharmacies to contest adverse audit outcomes.

Companion Bills

FL S0742

Similar To Pharmacies and Pharmacy Benefit Managers

FL S1476

Similar To Prescription Drug Coverage

Similar Bills

CA AB913

Pharmacy benefit managers.

CA SB362

Chain community pharmacies: quotas.

LA HB432

Provides for the regulation of pharmacy services administrative organizations (OR +$88,000 SG EX See Note)

MS HB1125

Pharmacy services; prohibit insurers and PBMs from requiring persons to obtain exclusively through pharmacies that they own.

LA HB387

Provides for the regulation of pharmacy services administrative organizations

CA AB401

Pharmacy: remote dispensing site pharmacy: telepharmacy: shared clinic office space.

CA AB690

Pharmacies: relocation: remote dispensing site pharmacy: pharmacy technician: qualifications.

AR SB593

To Amend The Arkansas Pharmacy Benefits Manager Licensure Act; And To Create The Pharmacy Services Administrative Organization Act.