Florida 2022 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H1095

Introduced
1/3/22  
Refer
1/10/22  
Refer
1/10/22  
Refer
1/10/22  
Refer
1/25/22  
Refer
1/25/22  
Refer
2/11/22  

Caption

Telephone Solicitation

Impact

If enacted, HB 1095 will have significant implications for businesses engaged in telemarketing. By limiting the use of automated dialing systems, companies will face higher compliance costs, as they must employ more personnel to conduct these calls manually. Additionally, the amendments include a retroactive application, meaning ongoing litigations may be affected—potentially increasing the legal obligations of telemarketers. This could lead to extensive changes in how businesses conduct their marketing processes and adapt their outreach strategies to meet new legal requirements.

Summary

House Bill 1095, titled 'Telephone Solicitation', aims to revise existing statues regarding telephonic sales calls in Florida. The bill focuses on prohibiting unsolicited telephonic sales calls made with automated systems and changes the definitions of critical terms, such as 'telephone solicitor' and 'automated system'. It establishes stricter regulations for telemarketers, mandating that these calls can only be made by live callers and must have express consent from the consumer. This legislative move intends to protect consumers from intrusive marketing practices and enhance their privacy rights.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1095 appears to be supportive, particularly among consumer advocacy groups and lawmakers who prioritize consumer protection. Proponents argue that the bill will mitigate the frustrations of many consumers who receive unwanted solicitation calls, thereby enhancing the overall consumer experience. However, some telemarketing associations express concern over the bill's potential implications for job losses and decreased marketing effectiveness as these changes could limit how they reach potential customers.

Contention

One notable point of contention revolves around the balance of consumer protection against industry interests. Telemarketing representatives argue that the bill may hinder their ability to effectively market their products, thereby hurting commerce. Critics within the industry also raise concerns about the practicality of implementing live calls for all solicitations and how this would impact small businesses relying on telemarketing as a cost-effective advertising strategy. The challenge ahead will be finding a compromise that maintains consumer protections while allowing businesses to operate efficiently.

Companion Bills

FL S1564

Similar To Telephone Solicitation

Similar Bills

VA SB1339

Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act; telephone solicitations by text message, effective date.

CA AB2021

Solicitations: do not contact list.

MS HB1350

Telephone solicitors; prohibit from making any solicitation regarding Medicare Advantage Plans and Medicare supplements.

CT SB00209

An Act Prohibiting Unsolicited Commercial Text Messages And Increasing Penalties For Violations Of The Do Not Call Registry.

NC H936

Robocall Solicitation Modifications

ME LD2234

An Act to Require Telephone Solicitors to Use the Reassigned Numbers Database

MS HB1177

Telephone solicitors; revise certain provisions regarding Medicare Advantage and Supplement plans.

CT HB05089

An Act Prohibiting Telemarketers From Transmitting Inaccurate Or Misleading Caller Identification Information.