Florida 2022 2022 Regular Session

Florida Senate Bill S1844 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 02/25/2022

                    The Florida Senate 
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT 
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) 
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Appropriations  
 
BILL: CS/SB 1844 
INTRODUCER:  Children, Families, and Elder Affairs Committee and Senator Bean 
SUBJECT:  Mental Health and Substance Abuse 
DATE: February 23, 2022 
 
 ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR  REFERENCE  	ACTION 
1. Delia Cox CF Fav/CS 
2. Ravelo Cibula JU Favorable 
3. Sneed Sadberry AP Favorable 
 
Please see Section IX. for Additional Information: 
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes 
 
I. Summary: 
CS/SB 1844 removes the requirement for Baker Act receiving facilities to hold voluntariness 
hearings for patients under 18 years of age seeking voluntary admission. The bill provides that 
receiving facilities may instead admit minors on a voluntary basis if the following conditions are 
met: 
 The patient is found to show evidence of mental illness; 
 The patient is suitable for treatment; and 
 The patient’s guardian provides express and informed consent to admission. 
 
Under the bill, before a minor patient is admitted for a voluntary examination under the Baker 
Act, providers at a receiving facility must determine that a minor patient has shown evidence of 
mental illness and suitability for treatment, and the express and informed consent of a parent or 
guardian must be obtained. 
 
The bill also: 
 Provides law enforcement officers with discretion in deciding whether or not to detain 
someone and transfer them to a receiving facility under both the Baker and Marchman Acts; 
 Requires law enforcement officers transporting an individual to a receiving facility for an 
involuntary examination under the Baker and Marchman Acts to:  
o Consider the person’s mental and behavioral state; and 
o Restrain the individual in the least restrictive manner possible, especially if the person is 
a minor. 
REVISED:   BILL: CS/SB 1844   	Page 2 
 
 
The bill may have an indeterminate fiscal impact on receiving facilities. See Section V. Fiscal 
Impact Statement. 
 
The bill is effective July 1, 2022. 
II. Present Situation: 
The Baker Act 
In 1971, the Legislature adopted the Florida Mental Health Act, known as the Baker Act.
1
 The 
Baker Act deals with Florida’s mental health commitment laws, and includes legal procedures 
for mental health examination and treatment, including voluntary and involuntary examinations.
2
 
The Baker Act also protects the rights of all individuals examined or treated for mental illness in 
Florida.
3
  
 
Involuntary Examination  
Individuals suffering from an acute mental health crisis may require emergency treatment to 
stabilize their condition. Emergency mental health examination and stabilization services may be 
provided on a voluntary or involuntary basis.
4
 An involuntary examination is required if there is 
reason to believe that the person has a mental illness and because of his or her mental illness: 
 The person has refused voluntary examination after conscientious explanation and disclosure 
of the purpose of the examination or is unable to determine for himself or herself whether 
examination is necessary; and 
 Without care or treatment, the person is likely to suffer from neglect or refuse to care for 
himself or herself; such neglect or refusal poses a real and present threat of substantial harm 
to his or her well-being; and it is not apparent that such harm may be avoided through the 
help of willing family members or friends or the provision of other services; or  
 There is a substantial likelihood that without care or treatment the person will cause serious 
bodily harm to himself or herself or others in the near future, as evidenced by recent 
behavior.
5
  
 
The involuntary examination may be initiated by: 
 A court entering an ex parte order stating that a person appears to meet the criteria for 
involuntary examination, based on sworn testimony;
6
   
 A law enforcement officer taking a person who appears to meet the criteria for involuntary 
examination into custody and delivering the person or having him or her delivered to a 
receiving facility for examination;
7
 or 
                                                
1
 Chapter 71-131, L.O.F..; The Baker Act is contained in ch. 394, F.S. 
2
 Sections 394.451-394.47891, F.S. 
3
 Section 394.459, F.S. 
4
 Sections 394.4625 and 394.463, F.S. 
5
 Section 394.463(1), F.S. 
6
 Section 394.463(2)(a)1., F.S. In addition, the order of the court must be made a part of the patient’s clinical record. 
7
 Section 394.463(2)(a)2., F.S. The officer must execute a written report detailing the circumstances under which the person 
was taken into custody, and the report must be made a part of the patient’s clinical record.  BILL: CS/SB 1844   	Page 3 
 
 A physician, clinical psychologist, psychiatric nurse, mental health counselor, marriage and 
family therapist, or clinical social worker executing a certificate stating that he or she has 
examined a person within the preceding 48 hours and finds that the person appears to meet 
the criteria for involuntary examination, including a statement of the professional’s 
observations supporting such conclusion.
8
 
 
Involuntary patients must be taken to either a public or a private facility that has been designated 
by the DCF as a Baker Act receiving facility. The purpose of receiving facilities is to receive and 
hold, or refer, as appropriate, involuntary patients under emergency conditions for psychiatric 
evaluation and to provide short-term treatment or transportation to the appropriate service 
provider.
9
 The patient must be examined by the receiving facility within 72 hours of the initiation 
of the involuntary examination and specified actions must be taken within that time frame to 
address the individual needs of the patient.
10
 
 
Voluntary Admissions and Transfer to Voluntary Status 
Baker Act receiving facilities also admit any person 18 years of age or older making application 
by express and informed consent for admission, or any person age 17 or under for whom such 
application is made by his or her guardian.
11
 If found to show evidence of mental illness, to be 
competent to provide express and informed consent, and to be suitable for treatment, a person 18 
years of age or older may be admitted to the facility.
12
  
 
A patient admitted on an involuntary basis who applies to be transferred to voluntary status must 
be transferred to voluntary status immediately, unless the patient has been charged with a crime, 
or has been involuntarily placed for treatment by a court pursuant to s. 394.467, F.S., and 
continues to meet the criteria for involuntary placement.
13
 
 
Voluntary Admissions for Minor Patients 
Any person age 17 or under may be admitted only after a hearing to verify the voluntariness of 
their consent.
14
 However, in 1997 a joint legislative committee determined that the 
“voluntariness hearing”
15
 described in the Florida Administrative Code at that time did not 
conform to a “hearing” as intended elsewhere in statute, as all other references to “hearings” in 
the Baker Act are judicial in nature.
16
 Moreover, minors lack the legal capacity to independently 
                                                
8
 Section 394.463(2)(a)3., F.S. The report and certificate shall be made a part of the patient’s clinical record 
9
 Section 394.455(40), F.S. 
10
 Section 394.463(2)(g), F.S.  
11
 Section 394.4625(1)(a), F.S. 
12
 Id. 
13
 Section 394.4625(4), F.S. 
14
 Id. 
15
 Prior to 1997, Rule 10E-5.21(4), F.A.C., defined a “voluntary hearing” as follows: “An informal hearing between a facility 
administrator or his designee and an individual under 18 years of age who has requested voluntary admission. The purpose of 
this meeting is to verify and ensure the voluntariness of the applicant’s request. This is a nonjudicial procedure and is solely 
for the purpose of safeguarding against an individual being coerced, pressured, misled, or in any way forced to seek voluntary 
admission to a facility.” Fla. Admin. Code R. 10E-5.21(4) (1996) (on file with the Senate Committee on Children, Families, 
and Elder Affairs). 
16
 The DCF, Frequently Asked Questions, p. 7-9, available at https://www.myflfamilies.com/service-programs/samh/crisis-
services/laws/Minors.pdf (last visited February 1, 2022) (hereinafter, “The DCF FAQs”).  BILL: CS/SB 1844   	Page 4 
 
consent to admission or treatment.
17
 As a result, all reference to “voluntary hearings” were 
removed from the Code.
18
 The DCF states that only a judicial hearing would suffice to meet this 
legal requirement, and that such hearings would need to be conducted prior to the minor's 
voluntary admission, despite the consent of the parents or assent of the child to the admission.
19
  
 
The majority of patients under the age of 18 years old who are admitted under the Baker Act are 
admitted under involuntary status and either discharged or later transferred to voluntary status, 
and the DCF states that it is unlikely that pre-admission court hearings for voluntary admission 
of minors are being conducted anywhere in the state.
20
 Some facilities still require staff to 
conduct a “voluntariness hearing”; some review voluntary admissions with the court magistrate 
at the time involuntary placement hearings are conducted; and others do not hold any type of 
hearing.
21
 
 
The Marchman Act 
In the early 1970s, the federal government enacted laws creating formula grants for states to 
develop continuums of care for individuals and families affected by substance abuse.
22
 The laws 
resulted in separate funding streams and requirements for alcoholism and drug abuse. In response 
to the laws, the Florida Legislature enacted chs. 396 and 397, F.S., relating to alcohol and drug 
abuse, respectively.
23
 Each of these laws governed different aspects of addiction, and thus had 
different rules promulgated by the state to fully implement the respective pieces of legislation.
24
 
However, because persons with substance abuse issues often do not restrict their misuse to one 
substance or another, having two separate laws dealing with the prevention and treatment of 
addiction was cumbersome and did not adequately address Florida’s substance abuse problem.
25
 
In 1993, legislation was adopted to combine ch. 396 and 397, F.S., into a single law, the Hal S. 
Marchman Alcohol and Other Drug Services Act (Marchman Act).
26
 
 
                                                
17
 Id., p. 8. 
18
 Prior to 1997, Rule 10E-5.050: Voluntary Admissions of Civil Patients, contained special requirements pertaining to the 
voluntary admission of minor patients at Baker Act receiving facilities. Specifically, a hearing must be conducted by the 
facility administrator or their designee, in such a manner as to ensure the applicant’s ability to freely express their desires. 
Participation in the hearing was to be limited to the individual seeking voluntary admission, and the facility administrator or 
their designee was to ensure the uninfluenced response of the applicant. At the specific request of the administrator or the 
patient, another facility staff member or an attorney may be present. Findings of the hearing were to be recorded in the 
patient’s clinical record and subject to review in the same manner as other items in the record. In the event the voluntary 
nature of the request was not confirmed, the facility was required to release the patient, unless the patient met the criteria for 
involuntary examination and a “Certificate of Professional Initiating Involuntary Examination” was executed. See Rule 10E-
5.050(3), F.A.C. (1996) (on file with the Senate Committee on Children, Families, and Elder Affairs). 
19
 The DCF FAQs, p. 11. 
20
 Id. 
21
 Id. 
22
 The DCF, Baker Act and Marchman Act Project Team Report for Fiscal Year 2016-2017, p. 4-5. (on file with the Senate 
Children, Families, and Elder Affairs Committee). 
23
 Id. 
24
 Id. 
25
 Id. 
26
 Chapter 93-39, s. 2, L.O.F., which codified current ch. 397, F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1844   	Page 5 
 
The Marchman Act encourages individuals to seek services on a voluntary basis within the 
existing financial and space capacities of a service provider.
27
 However, denial of addiction is a 
prevalent symptom of SUD, creating a barrier to timely intervention and effective treatment.
28
 
As a result, treatment typically must stem from a third party providing the intervention needed 
for SUD treatment.
29
 
 
Involuntary Admissions 
The Marchman Act establishes a variety of methods under which substance abuse assessment, 
stabilization, and treatment can be obtained on an involuntary basis. There are five involuntary 
admission procedures that can be broken down into two categories depending upon whether the 
court is involved.
30
 Three of the procedures do not involve the court, while two require direct 
petitions to the circuit court. The same criteria for involuntary admission apply regardless of the 
admission process used.
31
 
 
An individual meets the criteria for an involuntary admission under the Marchman Act when 
there is good faith reason to believe the individual is substance abuse impaired and, because of 
such impairment, has lost the power of self-control with respect to substance use, and either:
 
 
 Is in need of substance abuse services and, by reason of substance abuse impairment, his or 
her judgment has been so impaired that he or she is incapable of appreciating his or her need 
for such services and of making a rational decision in that regard;
32
 or 
 Without care or treatment: 
o The person is likely to suffer from neglect or refuse to care for himself or herself; 
o Such neglect or refusal poses a real and present threat of substantial harm to his or her 
well-being; and  
o It is not apparent that such harm may be avoided through the help of willing family 
members or friends or the provision of other services; or  
o There is substantial likelihood that the person: 
 Has inflicted, or threatened to or attempted to inflict physical harm on himself, 
herself, or another; or 
 Is likely to inflict, physical harm on himself, herself, or another unless he or she is 
admitted.
33
 
 
                                                
27
 See s. 397.601(1) and (2), F.S. An individual who wishes to enter treatment may apply to a service provider for voluntary 
admission.  Within the financial and space capabilities of the service provider, the individual must be admitted to treatment 
when sufficient evidence exists that he or she is impaired by substance abuse and his or her medical and behavioral 
conditions are not beyond the safe management capabilities of the service provider. 
28
 Darran Duchene and Patrick Lane, Fundamentals of the Marchman Act, Risk RX, Vol. 6 No. 2 (Apr. – Jun. 2006) State 
University System of Florida Self-Insurance Programs, available at http://flbog.sip.ufl.edu/risk-rx-article/fundamentals-of-
the-marchman-act/ (last visited February 1, 2022) (hereinafter cited as “Fundamentals of the Marchman Act”). 
29
 Id. 
30
 Id. 
31
 Id. 
32
 Section 394.675(2)(a), F.S. However, mere refusal to receive services does not constitute evidence of lack of judgment 
with respect to the person’s need for such services. 
33
 Section 397.675(2)(b), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1844   	Page 6 
 
Non-Court Involved Involuntary Admissions 
The three types of non-court procedures for involuntary admission for substance abuse treatment 
under the Marchman Act include protective custody, emergency admission, and the alternative 
involuntary assessment for minors. 
 
Law enforcement officers use the protective custody procedure when an individual is substance-
impaired or intoxicated in public and such impairment is brought to the attention of the officer.
34
 
The purpose of this procedure is to allow the person to be taken to a safe environment for 
observation and assessment to determine the need for treatment. A law enforcement officer may 
take the individual to their residence, to a hospital, a detoxification center, or an addiction 
receiving facility, whichever the officer determines is most appropriate.
35
  
 
If the individual in these circumstances does not consent to protective custody, the officer may 
do so against the person’s will, without using unreasonable force. In addition, the officer has the 
option of taking an individual to a jail or detention facility for his or her own protection. Such 
detention cannot be considered an arrest for any purpose and no record can be made to indicate 
that the person has been detained or charged with any crime.
36
 However, if the individual is a 
minor, the law enforcement officer must notify the nearest relative of a minor in protective 
custody without consent.
37
 
 
The second process, emergency admission, authorizes an individual who appears to meet the 
criteria for involuntary admission to be admitted to a hospital, an addiction receiving facility, or 
a detoxification facility for emergency assessment and stabilization, or to a less intensive 
component of a licensed service provider for assessment only.
38
 Individuals admitted for 
involuntary assessment and stabilization under this provision must have a certificate from a 
specified health professional
39
 demonstrating the need for this type of placement and 
recommending the least restrictive type of service that is appropriate to the needs of the 
individual.
40
 
 
Lastly, the alternative involuntary assessment for minors provides a way for a parent, legal 
guardian, or legal custodian to have a minor admitted to an addiction receiving facility to assess 
the minor’s need for treatment by a qualified professional.
41
 
                                                
34
 Section 397.677, F.S. The individual can be a minor or adult under this process. 
35
 Section 397.6771, F.S. A person may be held in protective custody for no more than 72 hours, unless a petition for 
involuntary assessment or treatment has been timely filed with the court within that timeframe to extend protective custody, 
Section 397.6773, F.S. 
36
 Section 397.6772(1), F.S. 
37
 Section 397.6772(2), F.S.  
38
 Section 397.679, F.S. 
39
 Section 397.6793(1), F.S., provides a list of professionals that include a physician, a clinical psychologist, a physician 
assistant working under the scope of practice of the supervising physician, a psychiatric nurse, an advanced practice 
registered nurse, a mental health counselor, a marriage and family therapist, a master’s-level-certified addictions professional 
for substance abuse services, or a clinical social worker. 
40
 Section 397.6793, F.S. The certificate can be from a physician, advanced practice registered nurse, a psychiatric nurse, a 
clinical psychologist, a clinical social worker, a marriage and family therapist, a mental health counselor, or a physician 
assistant working under the scope of a practice of the supervising physician, or a master’s-level-certified addictions 
professional for substance abuse services. 
41
 Section 397.6798, F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1844   	Page 7 
 
 
Transportation to a Facility  
Baker Act 
The Baker Act requires each county to designate a single law enforcement agency to transfer the 
person in need of services. A law enforcement officer is required to take a person into custody if 
the individual appears to meet the criteria for an involuntary examination under the Baker Act.
42
 
If the person is in custody based on noncriminal or minor criminal behavior, the law enforcement 
officer will transport the person to the nearest receiving facility. If, however, the person is 
arrested for a felony the person must first be processed in the same manner as any other criminal 
suspect. The law enforcement officer must then transport the person to the nearest facility, unless 
the facility is unable to provide adequate security.
43
 Law enforcement must then relinquish the 
person, along with corresponding documentation, to a responsible individual at the facility.
44
 
 
Marchman Act 
The Marchman Act authorizes an applicant seeking to have a person admitted to a facility, the 
person’s spouse or guardian, a law enforcement officer, or a health officer to transport the 
individual for an emergency assessment and stabilization.
45
  
 
If a person in circumstances which justify protective custody
46
 fails or refuses to consent to 
assistance and a law enforcement officer has determined that a hospital or a licensed 
detoxification or addictions receiving facility is the most appropriate place for the person, the 
officer may, after giving due consideration to the expressed wishes of the person: 
 Take the person to a hospital or to a licensed detoxification or addictions receiving facility 
against the person’s will but without using unreasonable force; or 
 In the case of an adult, detain the person for his or her own protection in any municipal or 
county jail or other appropriate detention facility.
47
  
 
The officer must use a standard form developed by the DCF to execute a written report detailing 
the circumstances under which the person was taken into custody, and the written report shall be 
included in the patient’s clinical record. 
III. Effect of Proposed Changes: 
Voluntariness Hearings for Minors under the Baker Act 
The bill amends s. 394.4625, F.S., removing the requirement for Baker Act receiving facilities to 
hold voluntariness hearings as a condition of admission for patients under 18 years of age. The 
                                                
42
 Section 394.463(2)(a)2., F.S. 
43
 Section 394.462(1)(f)-(g), F.S. 
44
 Section 394.462(3), F.S. 
45
 Section 397.6795, F.S. 
46
 Section 397.677, F.S., states that a law enforcement officer may implement protective custody measures when a minor or 
an adult who appears to meet the involuntary admission criteria in s. 397.675, F.S., is brought to the attention of law 
enforcement or in a public space.  
47
 Section 397.6772(1)(a)-(b), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1844   	Page 8 
 
bill provides that receiving facilities may instead admit minor patients if the following conditions 
are met: 
 The patient is found to show evidence of mental illness; 
 The patient is suitable for treatment; and 
 The patient’s guardian provides express and informed consent to admission. 
 
Under the bill, before a minor patient is admitted for a voluntary examination under the Baker 
Act, providers at a receiving facility must determine that a minor patient has shown evidence of 
mental illness and suitability for treatment, and the express and informed consent of a parent or 
guardian must be obtained. As a result, both medical providers and parents or guardians will 
have to agree on the decision to admit a minor patient. 
 
Transportation 
Baker Act 
The bill amends s. 394.463, F.S., authorizing, rather than requiring as in current law, law 
enforcement to transport those who appear to meet Baker Act criteria to receiving facilities.  
 
Further, the bill requires law enforcement transporting Baker Act patients to consider a person’s 
mental and behavioral state when deciding to restrain an individual for transport to a receiving 
facility, and to restrain the individual in the least restrictive manner possible, especially if the 
patient is a minor. 
 
Marchman Act 
The bill creates s. 397.341, F.S., making identical changes in the Marchman Act to those made 
by the bill under the Baker Act related to requiring a law enforcement officer to use the least 
restrictive means when transferring an individual under the Marchman Act, especially if the 
patient is a minor. 
 
The bill is effective July 1, 2022. 
IV. Constitutional Issues: 
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions: 
The bill does not appear to require cities and counties to expend funds or limit their 
authority to raise revenue or receive state-shared revenues as specified by Article VII, 
Section 18 of the Florida Constitution. 
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues: 
None. 
C. Trust Funds Restrictions: 
None.  BILL: CS/SB 1844   	Page 9 
 
D. State Tax or Fee Increases: 
None. 
E. Other Constitutional Issues: 
None identified. 
V. Fiscal Impact Statement: 
A. Tax/Fee Issues: 
None. 
B. Private Sector Impact: 
Admissions of minor Baker Act patients already require consent of the patient’s guardian, 
and as such this provision of CS/SB 1844 is unlikely to have an impact on receiving 
facilities or hospitals. Facilities may also see fewer patients brought in for involuntary 
examinations, which may have an indeterminate negative impact. 
C. Government Sector Impact: 
None. 
VI. Technical Deficiencies: 
None. 
VII. Related Issues: 
None. 
VIII. Statutes Affected: 
This bill substantially amends the following sections of the Florida Statutes: 394.4625 and 
394.463.   
 
This bill creates section 397.341 of the Florida Statutes.   
IX. Additional Information: 
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Changes: 
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.) 
CS by Children, Families, and Elder Affairs on January 25, 2022: 
The committee substitute:  BILL: CS/SB 1844   	Page 10 
 
 Provides law enforcement officers with discretion in deciding whether or not to detain 
someone and transfer them to a receiving facility under both the Baker and 
Marchman Acts; 
 Requires law enforcement officers transporting an individual to a receiving facility 
for an involuntary examination under the Baker and Marchman Acts to:  
o Consider the person’s mental and behavioral state; and 
o Restrain the individual in the least restrictive manner possible, especially if the 
person is a minor. 
 Removes the requirement for Baker Act receiving facilities to hold voluntariness 
hearings for patients under 18 years of age seeking voluntary admission and provides 
that receiving facilities may admit minors on a voluntary basis if the following 
conditions are met: 
o The patient is found to show evidence of mental illness; 
o The patient is suitable for treatment; and 
o The patient’s guardian provides express and informed consent to admission. 
B. Amendments: 
None. 
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.