Florida 2023 2023 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0075 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 05/18/2023

                     
This document does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives. 
STORAGE NAME: h0075z.DOCX 
DATE: 4/27/2023 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF FINAL BILL ANALYSIS  
 
BILL #: CS/HB 75    Pub. Rec./Judicial Assistants 
SPONSOR(S): Civil Justice Subcommittee, Smith and others 
TIED BILLS:   IDEN./SIM. BILLS: CS/SB 50 
 
 
 
 
FINAL HOUSE FLOOR ACTION: 117 Y’s 
 
0 N’s GOVERNOR’S ACTION: Pending 
 
 
SUMMARY ANALYSIS 
CS/HB 75 passed the House on April 19, 2023, as CS/SB 50. 
 
Judicial assistants provide essential administrative, secretarial, and clerical support functions to justices and 
judges. As judicial assistants regularly speak and work with attorneys, litigants, self-represented parties, or 
family members of litigants and defendants, judicial assistants may become the target of acts of retaliation or 
revenge from disgruntled litigants, defendants, or their associates and family members. Although personal 
identifying information of current and former justices and judges is exempt from public record requirements, 
personal identifying information of judicial assistants is not exempt.  
 
The bill expands the public records exemption pertaining to personal identifying information of justices and 
judges to also include current judicial assistants. Specifically, the following personal identifying information is 
exempt under the bill:     
 Home addresses, dates of birth, and telephone numbers of judicial assistants;  
 Names, home addresses, telephone numbers, dates of birth, and places of employment of spouses 
and children of judicial assistants; and 
 Names and locations of schools and day care facilities attended by the children of judicial 
assistants.  
 
Pursuant to the Open Government Sunset Review Act, this exemption will be automatically repealed on 
October 2, 2028, unless reenacted by the Legislature. The bill provides a statement of public necessity as 
required by the Florida Constitution.  
 
The bill may have an insignificant negative fiscal impact on state and local governments.  
 
Subject to the Governor’s veto powers, the effective date of this bill is July 1, 2023.    
STORAGE NAME: h0075z.DOCX 	PAGE: 2 
DATE: 4/27/2023 
  
I. SUBSTANTIVE INFORMATION 
 
A. EFFECT OF CHANGES:  
 
Background 
 
Public Records  
 
Article I, section 24(a) of the Florida Constitution sets forth the state’s government records access 
policy, guaranteeing every person a right to inspect or copy any public record of the legislative, 
executive, and judicial branches of government. However, the Legislature may provide a public records 
exemption by general law if the exemption passes by a two-thirds vote of each chamber, states with 
specificity the public necessity justifying the exemption (“public necessity statement”), and is no broader 
than necessary to meet its public purpose.
1
 
 
The Florida Statutes also address the public policy regarding access to government records. Section 
119.07(1), F.S., guarantees every person a right to inspect and copy any state, county, or municipal 
record, unless the record is exempt. Furthermore, the Open Government Sunset Review Act
2
 provides 
that a public record exemption may be created or maintained only if it serves an identifiable public 
purpose and the Legislature finds that the purpose is sufficiently compelling to override the strong 
public policy of open government and cannot be accomplished without the exemption.
3
 An identifiable 
public purpose is served if the exemption meets one of the following purposes: 
 Allows the state or its political subdivisions to effectively and efficiently administer a 
governmental program, which administration would be significantly impaired without the 
exemption;  
 Protects sensitive personal information that, if released, would be defamatory or would 
jeopardize an individual’s safety; however, only the identity of an individual may be exempted 
under this provision; or  
 Protects trade or business secrets.
4
 
 
Pursuant to s. 119.15, F.S., a new public records exemption or substantial amendment of an existing 
public records exemption is repealed on October 2 of the fifth year following enactment, unless the 
Legislature reenacts the exemption.
5
  
 
Furthermore, there is a difference between records the Legislature designates as exempt from public 
record requirements and those the Legislature deems confidential and exempt. A record classified as 
exempt from public disclosure may be disclosed under certain circumstances. However, if the 
Legislature designates a record as confidential and exempt from public disclosure, such record may not 
be released by the custodian of public records to anyone other than the persons or entities specifically 
designated in statute.
6
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exemptions Pertaining to Justices and Judges  
 
                                                
1
 Art. I, s. 24(c), Fla. Const. 
2
 S. 119.15, F.S. 
3
 S. 119.15(6)(b), F.S. 
4
 Id.  
5
 S. 119.15(3), F.S. 
6
 See WFTV, Inc. v. The School Board of Seminole, 874 So. 2d 48, 53 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), review denied 892 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. 
2004); City of Riviera Beach v. Barfield, 642 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Williams v. City of Minneola, 575 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 5th 
DCA 1991); See Attorney General Opinion 85-62 (August 1, 1985).   
STORAGE NAME: h0075z.DOCX 	PAGE: 3 
DATE: 4/27/2023 
  
The Florida Legislature has provided a specific exemption for justices and judges.
7
 This exemption 
applies to current and former justices and judges, and their families. Specifically, the exemption covers 
the following: 
 Home addresses, dates of birth, and telephone numbers; 
 Names, home addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers, and places of employment of their 
spouses and children; and  
 Names and locations of schools and day care facilities attended by their children.
8
  
 
The exemption for justices and judges was first enacted in 1991 and exempted home addresses and 
telephone numbers for justices and judges; home addresses, telephone numbers, and places of 
employment of spouses and children; and the names and locations of schools and day care facilities 
attended by their children.
9
 In 2012, the Legislature expanded the exemption to include dates of birth of 
justices and judges and their spouses and children and to include former justices and judges in the 
exemption.
10
 The Legislature found that dates of birth could be used to perpetuate fraud and acquire 
sensitive personal information, the release of which could cause great financial harm to an individual. 
The Legislature further found that the risk to the safety of justices and judges and their families 
continues after the justices and judges complete their public service.
11
 Most recently, in 2017, the 
Legislature further expanded the exemption to include the names of children and spouses of current 
and former justices and judges.
12
 In the public necessity statement, the Legislature found that allowing 
public access to the names of children and spouses would make them easy to find and expose them to 
threats or acts of revenge, and this possibility could compromise a justice’s or judge’s ability to carry out 
his or her duties without fear of retaliation against his or her family.
13
   
  
Judicial Assistants  
 
Judicial assistants provide essential administrative, secretarial, and clerical support functions to justices 
and judges.
14
 Specifically, their responsibilities may include:  
 Preparing and maintaining justices’ or judges’ calendars;  
 Maintaining trial dockets;  
 Screening phone calls and visitors to a justice’s or judge’s chambers; 
 Preparing correspondence and orders; and 
 Interacting with attorneys and litigants and their family members to resolve problems such as 
scheduling conflicts or other case-related issues.
15
  
 
Because of their interactions with various parties, judicial assistants may be exposed to the ill will or 
acts of revenge by disgruntled litigants, defendants, or their associates and family members. Numerous 
judicial assistants have reported such incidents. These threats include appearing at the judicial 
                                                
7
 S. 119.071(4)(d)2.e., F.S.  
8
 Id.  
9
 Ch. 91-149, Laws of Fla.  
10
 Ch. 2012-149, Laws of Fla.  
11
 Id.  
12
 Ch. 2017-66, Laws of Fla.  
13
 Id.  
14
 Florida Courts, Florida State Courts System Classification Specification, Classification Title: Judicial Assistant – County Court, 
https://www.flcourts.gov/content/download/751310/file/Judicial-Assisant-County-Court.pdf (last visited Feb. 02, 2023); Florida Courts, 
Florida State Courts System Classification Specification, Classification Title: Judicial Assistant – Circuit Court, 
https://www.flcourts.gov/content/download/751317/file/Judicial-Assistant-Circuit-Court.pdf (last visited Feb. 02, 2023); Florida Courts, 
Florida State Courts System Classification Specification, Classification Title: Appellate Judicial Assistant – District Court, 
https://www.flcourts.gov/content/download/751180/file/appellate-judicial-assistant-district-court.pdf (last visited Feb. 02, 2023); Florida 
Courts, Florida State Courts System Classification Specification, Classification Title: Appellate Judicial Assistant – Supreme Court, 
https://www.flcourts.gov/content/download/751181/file/appellate-judicial-assistant-supreme-court.pdf (last visited Feb. 02, 2023). 
15
 Id.    
STORAGE NAME: h0075z.DOCX 	PAGE: 4 
DATE: 4/27/2023 
  
assistant’s home, making threatening phone calls or sending text messages on personal devices, and 
making threats via personal e-mail.
16
  
 
Effect of the Bill  
 
The bill expands the public records exemption for current and former justices and judges to include 
current judicial assistants. Specifically, the following personal identifying information will be exempt 
from public record requirements under the bill:     
 Home addresses, dates of birth, and telephone numbers of judicial assistants;  
 Names, home addresses, telephone numbers, dates of birth, and places of employment of 
spouses and children of judicial assistants; and 
 Names and locations of schools and day care facilities attended by the children of judicial 
assistants.  
The bill defines “judicial assistant” to mean a court employee assigned to the following class codes: 
8140, 8150, 8310, and 8320. 
 
Pursuant to the Open Government Sunset Review Act, this exemption will be automatically repealed on 
October 2, 2028, unless reenacted by the Legislature. The bill includes the constitutionally required 
public necessity statement. The public necessity statement provides, in part, that the Legislature finds 
that the personal identifying information and location information of judicial assistants can be used to 
perpetuate fraud or to acquire sensitive personal information that could be used to cause financial 
harm. It also states that since judicial assistants assist in such tasks as assisting in reviewing cases, 
maintaining the court docket, screening phone calls and visitors to a justice’s or judge’s chambers, 
preparing orders, and coordinating and problem solving with attorneys and litigants, they may incur the 
ill will of litigants, the accused, the convicted, and their associates and families, and thus become a 
target of revenge. 
 
Subject to the Governor’s veto powers, the effective date of this bill is July 1, 2023.  
 
II.  FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT 
  
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT: 
 
1. Revenues: 
 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
 
See Fiscal Comments. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: 
 
1. Revenues: 
 
None. 
                                                
16
 See Judicial Assistants Association of Florida, JA Threats (2023) (on file with House Civil Justice Subcommittee).    
STORAGE NAME: h0075z.DOCX 	PAGE: 5 
DATE: 4/27/2023 
  
 
2. Expenditures: 
 
See Fiscal Comments. 
 
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR: 
 
None. 
 
D. FISCAL COMMENTS: 
 
The bill may have an insignificant negative fiscal impact on entities holding records that contain 
personal identifying information of judicial assistants, because staff responsible for complying with 
public record requests may require training related to the expansion of the public record exemption. 
Additionally, agencies could incur costs associated with redacting the confidential and exempt 
information prior to releasing records. However, any additional costs will likely be absorbed within 
existing resources.
17
 
 
 
 
 
                                                
17
 See Justice Administrative Commission, Bill Analysis Response for Senate Bill 0050 (Dec. 14, 2022), on file with the House Civil 
Justice Subcommittee; Office of the State Courts Administrator, Senate Bill 50 2023 Judicial Impact Statement (Jan. 9, 2023), on file 
with the House Civil Justice Subcommittee; Florida Court Clerks and Comptrollers, Senate Bill 50 Bill Analysis (Jan. 11, 2023), on file 
with the House Civil Justice Subcommittee.