Florida 2023 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0359 Latest Draft

Bill / Comm Sub Version Filed 03/24/2023

                               
 
CS/CS/HB 359  	2023 
 
 
 
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. 
hb0359-02-c2 
Page 1 of 9 
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P	R E S E N T A T I V E	S 
 
 
 
A bill to be entitled 1 
An act relating to local government comprehensive 2 
plans; amending s. 163.3184, F.S.; revising the review 3 
process for adoption of comprehensive plan amendments; 4 
providing that the prevailing party in a challenge to 5 
a plan or plan amendment is entitled to recover 6 
attorney fees and costs; providing retroactive 7 
applicability; amending s. 163.3187, F.S.; providing 8 
that the prevailing party in a challenge to the 9 
compliance of a small scale development order is 10 
entitled to recover attorney fees and costs; amending 11 
s. 163.3202, F.S.; providing applicability; amending 12 
s. 163.3215, F.S.; making technical changes; providing 13 
an effective date. 14 
 15 
Be It Enacted by the Legisl ature of the State of Florida: 16 
 17 
 Section 1.  Paragraph (c) of subsection (3) of section 18 
163.3184, Florida Statutes, is amended, and paragraph (g) is 19 
added to subsection (5) of that section, to read: 20 
 163.3184  Process for adoption of comprehensive plan o r 21 
plan amendment.— 22 
 (3)  EXPEDITED STATE REVIEW PROCESS FOR ADOPTION OF 23 
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS. — 24 
 (c)1.  The local government shall hold its second public 25     
 
CS/CS/HB 359  	2023 
 
 
 
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. 
hb0359-02-c2 
Page 2 of 9 
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P	R E S E N T A T I V E	S 
 
 
 
hearing, which shall be a hearing on whether to adopt one or 26 
more comprehensive plan amendment s pursuant to subsection (11). 27 
If the local government fails, within 180 days after receipt of 28 
agency comments, to hold the second public hearing, the 29 
amendment is amendments shall be deemed withdrawn unless 30 
extended by agreement with notice to the state l and planning 31 
agency and any affected person that provided comments on the 32 
amendment. If the amendment is not adopted at the second public 33 
hearing, the amendment must be formally adopted by the local 34 
government within 180 days after the second public hearin g or 35 
the amendment is deemed withdrawn The 180-day limitation does 36 
not apply to amendments processed pursuant to s. 380.06 . 37 
 2.  All comprehensive plan amendments adopted by the 38 
governing body, along with the supporting data and analysis, 39 
shall be transmitted within 10 working days after the second 40 
public hearing to the state land planning agency and any other 41 
agency or local government that provided timely comments under 42 
subparagraph (b)2. 43 
 3.  The state land planning agency shall notify the local 44 
government of any deficiencies within 5 working days after 45 
receipt of an amendment package. For purposes of completeness, 46 
an amendment shall be deemed complete if it contains a full, 47 
executed copy of the adoption ordinance or ordinances; in the 48 
case of a text amendment, a full copy of the amended language in 49 
legislative format with new words inserted in the text 50     
 
CS/CS/HB 359  	2023 
 
 
 
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. 
hb0359-02-c2 
Page 3 of 9 
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P	R E S E N T A T I V E	S 
 
 
 
underlined, and words deleted stricken with hyphens; in the case 51 
of a future land use map amendment, a copy of the future land 52 
use map clearly depicting th e parcel, its existing future land 53 
use designation, and its adopted designation; and a copy of any 54 
data and analyses the local government deems appropriate. 55 
 4.  An amendment adopted under this paragraph does not 56 
become effective until 31 days after the st ate land planning 57 
agency notifies the local government that the plan amendment 58 
package is complete. If timely challenged, an amendment does not 59 
become effective until the state land planning agency or the 60 
Administration Commission enters a final order dete rmining the 61 
adopted amendment to be in compliance. 62 
 (5)  ADMINISTRATIVE CHALLENGES TO PLANS AND PLAN 63 
AMENDMENTS.— 64 
 (g)  The prevailing party in a challenge filed under this 65 
subsection is entitled to recover attorney fees and costs in 66 
challenging or defendi ng a plan or plan amendment, including 67 
reasonable appellate attorney fees and costs. 68 
 Section 2.  The amendment made by section 1 of this act to 69 
s. 163.3184(3)(c), Florida Statutes, is remedial in nature, is 70 
intended to clarify existing law, and applies retroactively to 71 
January 1, 2022. 72 
 Section 3.  Paragraph (a) of subsection (5) of section 73 
163.3187, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: 74 
 163.3187  Process for adoption of small scale comprehensive 75     
 
CS/CS/HB 359  	2023 
 
 
 
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. 
hb0359-02-c2 
Page 4 of 9 
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P	R E S E N T A T I V E	S 
 
 
 
plan amendment.— 76 
 (5)(a)  Any affected person may file a petition with the 77 
Division of Administrative Hearings pursuant to ss. 120.569 and 78 
120.57 to request a hearing to challenge the compliance of a 79 
small scale development amendment with this act within 30 days 80 
following the local government's adoption of the amendment and 81 
shall serve a copy of the petition on the local government. An 82 
administrative law judge shall hold a hearing in the affected 83 
jurisdiction not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days 84 
following the filing of a petition and the assignment of an 85 
administrative law judge. The parties to a hearing held pursuant 86 
to this subsection shall be the petitioner, the local 87 
government, and any intervenor. In the proceeding, the plan 88 
amendment shall be determined to be in compliance if the local 89 
government's determination that the small scale development 90 
amendment is in compliance is fairly debatable. The state land 91 
planning agency may not intervene in any proceeding initiated 92 
pursuant to this section. The prevailing party in a challenge 93 
filed under this parag raph is entitled to recover attorney fees 94 
and costs in challenging or defending the order, including 95 
reasonable appellate attorney fees and costs. 96 
 Section 4.  Subsection (6) of section 163.3202, Florida 97 
Statutes, is renumbered as subsection (7), and a new subsection 98 
(6) is added to that section to read: 99 
 163.3202  Land development regulations. — 100     
 
CS/CS/HB 359  	2023 
 
 
 
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. 
hb0359-02-c2 
Page 5 of 9 
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P	R E S E N T A T I V E	S 
 
 
 
 (6)  Land development regulations relating to any 101 
characteristic of development other than use, or intensity or 102 
density of use, do not apply to Florida College System 103 
institutions as defined in s. 1000.21(3). 104 
 Section 5.  Subsections (3) and (4) of section 163.3215, 105 
Florida Statutes, are amended to read: 106 
 163.3215  Standing to enforce local comprehensive plans 107 
through development orders. — 108 
 (3)  Any aggrieved or adversely affected party may maintain 109 
a de novo action for declaratory, injunctive, or other relief 110 
against any local government to challenge any decision of such 111 
local government granting or denying an application for, or to 112 
prevent such local government from taking any action on, a 113 
development order, as defined in s. 163.3164, on the basis that 114 
the development order which materially alters the use or density 115 
or intensity of use on a particular piece of property rendering 116 
it which is not consistent with t he comprehensive plan adopted 117 
under this part. The de novo action must be filed no later than 118 
30 days following rendition of a development order or other 119 
written decision, or when all local administrative appeals, if 120 
any, are exhausted, whichever occurs la ter. 121 
 (4)  If a local government elects to adopt or has adopted 122 
an ordinance establishing, at a minimum, the requirements listed 123 
in this subsection, the sole method by which an aggrieved and 124 
adversely affected party may challenge any decision of local 125     
 
CS/CS/HB 359  	2023 
 
 
 
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. 
hb0359-02-c2 
Page 6 of 9 
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P	R E S E N T A T I V E	S 
 
 
 
government granting or denying an application for a development 126 
order, as defined in s. 163.3164, which materially alters the 127 
use or density or intensity of use on a particular piece of 128 
property, on the basis that it is not consistent with the 129 
comprehensive plan adopted under this part, is by an appeal 130 
filed by a petition for writ of certiorari filed in circuit 131 
court no later than 30 days following rendition of a development 132 
order or other written decision of the local government, or when 133 
all local administrati ve appeals, if any, are exhausted, 134 
whichever occurs later. An action for injunctive or other relief 135 
may be joined with the petition for certiorari. Principles of 136 
judicial or administrative res judicata and collateral estoppel 137 
apply to these proceedings. Mi nimum components of the local 138 
process are as follows: 139 
 (a)  The local process must make provision for notice of an 140 
application for a development order that materially alters the 141 
use or density or intensity of use on a particular piece of 142 
property, including notice by publication or mailed notice 143 
consistent with the provisions of ss. 125.66(4)(b)2. and 3. and 144 
166.041(3)(c)2.b. and c., and must require prominent posting at 145 
the job site. The notice must be given within 10 days after the 146 
filing of an applicatio n for a development order; however, 147 
notice under this subsection is not required for an application 148 
for a building permit or any other official action of local 149 
government which does not materially alter the use or density or 150     
 
CS/CS/HB 359  	2023 
 
 
 
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. 
hb0359-02-c2 
Page 7 of 9 
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P	R E S E N T A T I V E	S 
 
 
 
intensity of use on a particula r piece of property. The notice 151 
must clearly delineate that an aggrieved or adversely affected 152 
person has the right to request a quasi -judicial hearing before 153 
the local government for which the application is made, must 154 
explain the conditions precedent to the appeal of any 155 
development order ultimately rendered upon the application, and 156 
must specify the location where written procedures can be 157 
obtained that describe the process, including how to initiate 158 
the quasi-judicial process, the timeframes for initiat ing the 159 
process, and the location of the hearing. The process may 160 
include an opportunity for an alternative dispute resolution. 161 
 (b)  The local process must provide a clear point of entry 162 
consisting of a written preliminary decision, at a time and in a 163 
manner to be established in the local ordinance, with the time 164 
to request a quasi-judicial hearing running from the issuance of 165 
the written preliminary decision; the local government, however, 166 
is not bound by the preliminary decision. A party may request a 167 
hearing to challenge or support a preliminary decision. 168 
 (c)  The local process must provide an opportunity for 169 
participation in the process by an aggrieved or adversely 170 
affected party, allowing a reasonable time for the party to 171 
prepare and present a case f or the quasi-judicial hearing. 172 
 (d)  The local process must provide, at a minimum, an 173 
opportunity for the disclosure of witnesses and exhibits prior 174 
to hearing and an opportunity for the depositions of witnesses 175     
 
CS/CS/HB 359  	2023 
 
 
 
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. 
hb0359-02-c2 
Page 8 of 9 
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P	R E S E N T A T I V E	S 
 
 
 
to be taken. 176 
 (e)  The local process may not require that a party be 177 
represented by an attorney in order to participate in a hearing. 178 
 (f)  The local process must provide for a quasi -judicial 179 
hearing before an impartial special master who is an attorney 180 
who has at least 5 years' experience and who s hall, at the 181 
conclusion of the hearing, recommend written findings of fact 182 
and conclusions of law. The special master shall have the power 183 
to swear witnesses and take their testimony under oath, to issue 184 
subpoenas and other orders regarding the conduct of the 185 
proceedings, and to compel entry upon the land. The standard of 186 
review applied by the special master in determining whether a 187 
proposed development order is consistent with the comprehensive 188 
plan shall be strict scrutiny in accordance with Florida law. 189 
 (g)  At the quasi-judicial hearing, all parties must have 190 
the opportunity to respond, to present evidence and argument on 191 
all issues involved which are related to the development order, 192 
and to conduct cross -examination and submit rebuttal evidence. 193 
Public testimony must be allowed. 194 
 (h)  The local process must provide for a duly noticed 195 
public hearing before the local government at which public 196 
testimony is allowed. At the quasi -judicial hearing, the local 197 
government is bound by the special master's findin gs of fact 198 
unless the findings of fact are not supported by competent 199 
substantial evidence. The governing body may modify the 200     
 
CS/CS/HB 359  	2023 
 
 
 
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. 
hb0359-02-c2 
Page 9 of 9 
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P	R E S E N T A T I V E	S 
 
 
 
conclusions of law if it finds that the special master's 201 
application or interpretation of law is erroneous. The governing 202 
body may make reasonable legal interpretations of its 203 
comprehensive plan and land development regulations without 204 
regard to whether the special master's interpretation is labeled 205 
as a finding of fact or a conclusion of law. The local 206 
government's final decision mu st be reduced to writing, 207 
including the findings of fact and conclusions of law, and is 208 
not considered rendered or final until officially date -stamped 209 
by the city or county clerk. 210 
 (i)  An ex parte communication relating to the merits of 211 
the matter under review may not be made to the special master. 212 
An ex parte communication relating to the merits of the matter 213 
under review may not be made to the governing body after a time 214 
to be established by the local ordinance, which time must be no 215 
later than receipt o f the special master's recommended order by 216 
the governing body. 217 
 (j)  At the option of the local government, the process may 218 
require actions to challenge the consistency of a development 219 
order with land development regulations to be brought in the 220 
same proceeding. 221 
 Section 6.  This act shall take effect July 1, 2023. 222