Florida 2023 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0677

Introduced
2/8/23  
Refer
2/14/23  
Refer
2/14/23  
Refer
3/16/23  

Caption

Electronic Payment Transactions

Impact

The implementation of HB 677 is set to have significant implications for state laws regarding electronic payment transactions. By ensuring that merchants are not charged fees on taxable amounts unless specific data is transmitted, the bill supports fairer practices in the financial ecosystem. It also establishes a civil penalty structure for entities that violate these provisions, which could lead to more compliant behavior from payment facilitators and potentially lower operational costs for merchants across Florida.

Summary

House Bill 677, known as the Electronic Payment Transactions Act, introduces important changes in how interchange fees are handled in electronic payment transactions, specifically concerning tax and tip amounts. The bill aims to enhance protections for merchants by prohibiting entities such as payment card networks and banks from charging interchange fees on tax and tip amounts if the merchants provide accurate data during the transaction authorization. This law is expected to streamline the process for merchants and mitigate unnecessary costs associated with electronic payment processing.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 677 appears to be positive among merchant advocates who view it as a critical step toward fairer financial practices. Supporters argue that this bill will encourage transparent and equitable treatment in payment transactions, allowing small businesses to retain more of their revenue. However, there may be concerns from financial institutions regarding the operational implications of adhering to this new requirement and potential loss of revenue from interchange fees.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise around the enforcement and effectiveness of the bill's provisions. While advocates emphasize the need for protecting merchants from excessive fees, critics might argue about the feasibility of ensuring that all merchants accurately transmit the required data with their transactions. Furthermore, the potential civil penalties for improper handling of interchange fees could lead to disputes between merchants and payment processors, indicating a need for clear guidelines and communication to avoid confusion in implementation.

Companion Bills

FL S0564

Same As Interchange Fees on Taxes

Similar Bills

CA AB1065

Credit card transaction fees: tax payments: Consumer Inflation Reduction and Tax Fairness Act.

AZ HB2629

Merchant; fees; calculation; transactions; penalty

NM HB476

Price Fixing Prohibition & Tax Fairness

KS HB2089

Enacting the consumer inflation reduction and tax fairness act and exempting the portion of a credit card transaction constituting a tax or gratuity from assessment of the fee charged by the card issuer.

AK HB171

Interchange Fees: Tax & Gratuity

MA H1259

Relative to price-fixing prohibition, consumer transparency & tax fairness

IN SB0412

Payment card network interchange fees.

MA S205

Relative to price-fixing prohibition and consumer transparency