Florida 2023 2023 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0813 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 03/28/2023

                    This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives. 
STORAGE NAME: h0813c.CFS 
DATE: 3/28/2023 
 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS      
 
BILL #: CS/CS/HB 813    Support for Dependent Adult Children 
SPONSOR(S): Children, Families & Seniors Subcommittee, Civil Justice Subcommittee, Tant 
TIED BILLS:   IDEN./SIM. BILLS: CS/SB 226 
 
REFERENCE 	ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or 
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF 
1) Civil Justice Subcommittee 	18 Y, 0 N, As CS Mathews Jones 
2) Children, Families & Seniors Subcommittee 15 Y, 0 N, As CS Curry Brazzell 
3) Judiciary Committee    
SUMMARY ANALYSIS 
Generally, the obligation of a parent to support a child ceases when the child reaches majority (usually age 
18). However, a limited exception arises when the child is unable to support himself or herself because of 
physical or mental disabilities. Under the common law, parents have a duty of support for a dependent adult 
child (DAC) who is unable to support himself or herself because of a mental or physical incapacity that began 
prior to the child reaching majority. This duty of support rests upon both parents throughout the dependency 
and throughout their lives. Aside from the limited provisions under s. 743.07, F.S., current law does not 
otherwise recognize or regulate any right to support for DACs nor does it provide guidelines for calculating 
support owed to DACs. 
 
Under s. 61.29, F.S., each parent has a fundamental obligation to support his or her minor or legally dependent 
child. The court shall order either or both parents owing a duty of support to the child to pay support pursuant 
to s. 61.30, F.S. A parent’s child support obligation is calculated based on the child support guidelines 
established in s. 61.30, F.S. These guidelines use a mathematical formula to develop the basic child support 
obligation of each parent. 
 
Parents have a common law obligation to support their DAC, however, such duty is not fully codified in the 
Florida Statutes. S. 743.07(2), F.S., permits a court to require support for a dependent child over the age of 18 
when such dependency is due to a mental or physical incapacity which began before the child reached the age 
of majority. While Florida law allows a court to order support for a DAC, it does not require or create a blanket 
obligation to do so. As such, there is no consistency from court to court regarding how to handle support for a 
DAC. Further, there is no guidance as to how to calculate such support, as is similarly found in ch. 61 for the 
calculation of support for a minor child.  
 
The bill creates s. 61.1255, F.S., to codify the common law obligation of a parent to support a DAC after he or 
she reaches the age of majority. The bill specifies who may bring an action to establish such support and 
provides that support payments should be made directly to the DAC. The bill permits a portion of the support to 
be placed in a special needs trust or pooled trust for the DAC’s benefit and prohibits a court from entering an 
order for support that would make the DAC ineligible for programs or services the DAC currently participates 
in, receives, or would be reasonably expected to participate in after reaching the age of majority. 
 
The bill also creates s. 61.31, F.S., to establish new support guidelines for courts to use in support calculations 
for a DAC. The bill permits a petition to appoint a guardian advocate to request authority to file a civil suit to 
establish support payments on behalf of the DAC. Under the bill, any modifications and enforcement of support 
for a DAC must be made in accordance with the requirements established for regular child support under ch. 
61. The bill assigns jurisdiction over a DAC and defines the court’s role in such a proceeding.  
 
The effective date of the bill is July 1, 2023.  
   STORAGE NAME: h0813c.CFS 	PAGE: 2 
DATE: 3/28/2023 
  
FULL ANALYSIS 
I.  SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS 
 
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES: 
Background 
 
Support for Dependent Adult Children 
 
Generally, the obligation of a parent to financially support a child ceases when the child reaches 
majority (usually age 18). However, a limited exception arises when the child is unable to support 
himself or herself because of physical or mental disabilities.
1
 Under the common law, parents have a 
duty of support for a dependent adult child (DAC) who is unable to support himself or herself because 
of a mental or physical incapacity that began prior to the child reaching majority.
2
 This duty of support 
rests upon both parents throughout the dependency.
3
 
 
In 1973, the Legislature adopted s. 743.07, F.S., which removed the disability of nonage for those 18 
years of age and older, but also preserved an exception for continued support of a certain class of 
dependent adults.
4
 Specifically, s. 743.07(2) allows a court to order parents to continue financially 
supporting a dependent adult child, if either:  
 The dependency was the result of a mental or physical incapacity that began prior to the person 
reaching majority.
5
 
 The dependent person is between the ages of 18 and 19, is dependent in fact, and is still in high 
school but performing in good faith with a reasonable expectation of graduating before turning 
19.  
 
The circuit court is the proper court for such adjudications.
6
 The right to receive support, and the 
corresponding right to bring the cause of action, belongs to the DAC,
7
 although the DAC does not need 
to be adjudicated dependent before he or she reaches majority for the court to order extended 
support.
8
 In cases where the parents of a dependent adult child have dissolved their marriage, and one 
party has fulfilled his or her child support obligations through the age of majority, an independent action 
may be brought to adjudicate that party’s continuing support obligation for the DAC.
9
  
 
So, while Florida common law recognizes the duty of parents to provide for their dependent adult 
children, aside from the limited provisions under s. 743.07, F.S., the Florida Statutes do not otherwise 
recognize or regulate any right to support for DACs, nor do they provide guidelines for calculating 
support owed to DACs. 
 
Child Support  
 
Under s. 61.29, F.S., each parent has a fundamental obligation to support his or her minor or legally 
dependent child. The court shall order either or both parents owing a duty of support to the child to pay 
support pursuant to s. 61.30, F.S. A parent’s child support obligation is calculated based on the child 
support guidelines established in s. 61.30, F.S. These guidelines use a mathematical formula to 
develop the basic child support obligation of each parent. The court may not deviate from the basic 
                                                
1
 Perla v. Perla, 58 So. 2d 689, 690 (Fla. 1952). 
2
 Brown v. Brown, 714 So. 2d 475, 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Monitzer v. Monitzer, 600 So. 2d 575, 575 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Fincham v. 
Levin, 155 So. 2d 883, 884 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963). 
3
 Fernandez v. Fernandez, 306 So. 3d 1013, 1015 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (quoting Hastings v. Hastings, 841 So. 2d 484, 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 
2003) (internal citations omitted)). 
4
 Id. at 1015. 
5
 Id. at 1016-17. 
6
 Id. at 1015. 
7
 Id. 
8
 Skelly v. Skelly, 300 So. 3d 342, 345 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (confirming that s. 743.07(2), F.S., does not require that a child be adjudicated 
dependent before he or she reaches majority for the trial court to order extended support)). 
9
 Fernandez, 306 So. 3d at 1015.  STORAGE NAME: h0813c.CFS 	PAGE: 3 
DATE: 3/28/2023 
  
child support obligation provided under the guidelines by more than five percent when establishing the 
child support award except in very limited circumstances, such as when a court orders substantial time-
sharing.  
 
All child support orders and income deduction orders entered on or after October 1, 2010, must 
provide, among other things, for child support to terminate on a child’s 18
th
 birthday, unless the court 
finds or has previously found that child support should continue where either: 
 The dependency was the result of a mental or physical incapacity that began prior to the person 
reaching majority. 
 The dependent person is between the ages of 18 and 19, is dependent in fact, and is still in high 
school but performing in good faith with a reasonable expectation of graduating before turning 
19. 
10
  
 
Additionally, a court that initially enters an order requiring a parent to make child support payments has 
continuing jurisdiction after entry of the initial order to modify the amount and terms and conditions of 
the child support payments if: 
 The modification is found by the court to be in the best interests of the child; 
 There is a substantial change in the circumstances of the parties; 
 The child support payments are for an adult child who is dependent due to a mental or 
physical incapacity that began before age 18; 
 The child support payments are for a child who is between the ages of 18 and 19 and is 
reasonably expected to graduate before age 19; or 
 The child reaches majority, is emancipated, marries, joins the armed services, or dies.
11
 
 
Guardianship 
 
If a court finds that a person lacks the ability to safely manage the things that belong to him or her, or 
lacks the ability to meet his or her basic health, safety, and self-care needs, a court may rule that the 
person is “incapacitated.”
12
 In many cases, after a court decides that a person is incapacitated, it will 
choose someone else to make some or all the decisions for the incapacitated person. This is known as 
a guardianship.
13
 
 
Being placed in a guardianship may result in the loss of a person’s right to make his or her own life 
choices. The rights that a person can lose include the right to contract, vote, travel, marry, work, 
consent to treatment, sue or defend lawsuits, choose living arrangements, make decisions about his or 
her social life, have a driver’s license, personally apply for benefits, and manage money or property.
14
  
 
A guardianship must be specific to the abilities and needs of the individual and should not be any more 
restrictive than necessary.
15
 Consequently, there are different types of guardianships under state law, 
including:
16
 
 Preneed guardian;
17
 
 Voluntary guardianship;
18
 
 Emergency temporary guardianship;
19
 
 Limited guardianship;
20
 
                                                
10
 Ss. 61.13(1)(a)1. and 743.07(2), F.S. 
11
 S. 61.13(1)(a)2., F.S. 
12
 See generally Part V, Ch. 744, F.S.; see also Disability Rights Florida, What is Guardianship?, https://disabilityrightsflorida.org/disability-
topics/disability_topic_info/what_is_guardianship (last visited Mar. 1, 2023). 
13
 Id. 
14
 S. 744.1012(1), F.S.; see also Disability Rights Florida, Types of Guardianship, https://disabilityrightsflorida.org/disability-
topics/disability_topic_info/types_of_guardianship (last visited Mar. 1, 2023). 
15
 S. 744.1012(2), F.S.; see also Disability Rights Florida, Types of Guardianship. 
16
 See generally Disability Rights Florida, Types of Guardianship. 
17
 Ss. 744.3045 and 744.3046, F.S. 
18
 S. 744.341, F.S. 
19
 S. 744.3031, F.S. 
20
 Ss. 744.441(1), F.S. and s. 744.102(9)(a), F.S.   STORAGE NAME: h0813c.CFS 	PAGE: 4 
DATE: 3/28/2023 
  
 Guardian advocate for individuals who have a developmental disability;
21
 
 Guardian advocate for individuals receiving mental health treatment;
22
 and 
 Full (that is, “plenary”) guardianship.
23
 
 
The powers and duties of a court-appointed guardian include, but are not limited to: 
 Filing an initial plan and annual reports;
24
  
 Making provision for the medical, mental, rehabilitative, and personal care of the person;
25
 
 Making residential decisions on behalf of the person;
26
 
 Advocating on behalf of the person in institutional and other residential settings;
27
 and 
 Making financial decisions on behalf of the person.
28
  
 
Among other requirements, guardians must file an annual guardianship report with the court.
29
 The 
annual guardianship report must be filed within 90 days after the last day of the anniversary month that 
the letters of guardianship were signed, and the plan must cover the coming fiscal year, ending on the 
last day in such anniversary month. The annual guardianship report must include an annual 
guardianship plan
30
 containing information regarding the residence of the person for whom the 
guardianship has been established; the medical and mental health conditions, treatment, and 
rehabilitation needs of the person; the social condition of the person; and a list of any preexisting orders 
not to resuscitate, or preexisting advance directives.
31
 
 
Guardian Advocates  
 
A “guardian advocate” is a person appointed by court order to represent a person with developmental 
disabilities.
32
 A “developmental disability” means:  
 A disorder or syndrome that is attributable to intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, autism, spina 
bifida, Down syndrome, Phelan-McDermid syndrome, or Prader-Willi syndrome;  
 Manifesting before the age of 18; and  
 Constituting a substantial handicap that can reasonably be expected to continue indefinitely.
33
 
 
Guardian advocacy is a way for family members, caregivers, or friends of a person with a 
developmental disability to obtain the legal authority to act on such person’s behalf if the person lacks 
the decision-making ability to do some, but not all, of the decision-making tasks necessary to care for 
his or her person or property, or if the person has voluntarily petitioned for the appointment of a 
guardian advocate.
34
  
 
State law recognizes the appointment of a guardian advocate as a less restrictive alternative to 
guardianship.
35
 A guardian advocate can be appointed without having to declare the person with a 
developmental disability incapacitated.
36
 In a case with a guardian advocate, the court will also appoint 
an attorney for the person with the developmental disability to ensure that his or her best interests are 
protected.
37
 
 
                                                
21
 Ss. 744.3085 and 393.12, F.S. 
22
 Ss. 744.3085 and 394.4598, F.S. 
23
 S. 744.441(1), F.S.; see also s. 744.102(9)(b), F.S. (defining “plenary guardian”). 
24
 S. 744.361(6)-(7), F.S. 
25
 S. 744.361(13)(f), F.S. 
26
 S. 744.361(13)(h), F.S. 
27
 S. 744.361(13)(i), F.S. 
28
 S. 744.361(12), F.S. 
29
 S. 744.367(1), F.S. 
30
 S. 744.367(3)(a), F.S. 
31
 S. 744.3675, F.S. 
32
 Ss. 393.063(21) and 393.12, F.S. 
33
 S. 393.063(12), F.S. 
34
 S. 393.12(2)(a), F.S.; see also Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, Seminole County, Florida, Florida Guardian Advocate Law and Information 
(Jul. 2017), https://flcourts18.org/docs/sem/Florida_Guardian_Advocacy_Law_and_information_Guide.pdf. (last visited Mar. 1, 2023). 
35
 S. 744.3085, F.S. 
36
 S. 393.12(2)(a), F.S. 
37
 S. 393.12(2)(b), F.S.  STORAGE NAME: h0813c.CFS 	PAGE: 5 
DATE: 3/28/2023 
  
A guardian advocate for a person with a developmental disability has the same powers, duties, and 
responsibilities required of a guardian under the guardianship statute or as defined by court order 
issued under the statute governing the appointment of guardian advocates.
38
  
 
Special Needs Trusts and Pooled Trusts 
 
A special needs trust, sometimes called a supplemental needs trust, is a legal mechanism which allows 
assets to be held on behalf of a person with disabilities without affecting his or her eligibility for means-
tested public benefits such as Medicaid or Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”).
39
  
 
Special needs trusts are meant to supplement the funds and services available through government 
programs.
40
 While assets held by the trust are not used to determine the person’s qualification for such 
programs, there are regulations imposed regarding disbursements.
41
 To create a valid special needs 
trust, the trust must be established in a way that complies with federal law.
42
 Specifically, a special 
needs trust must: 
 Contain the assets of an individual under age 65; 
 Be established for an individual who has a disability that makes him or her substantially 
unable to work;
43
 
 Be established for the benefit of the individual; 
 Be established by the individual’s parent, grandparent, legal guardian, or a court; and 
 Reimburse the state for all of the medical assistance paid on behalf of the individual from any 
remaining assets upon the individual’s death.
44
 
 
Special needs trusts can be either “first-party” or “third-party” trusts.
45
 A first-party special needs trust is 
created with assets belonging to an individual with disabilities, who becomes the “beneficiary.” The 
funds typically consist of a personal injury settlement or an inheritance. The person must be under 65 
at the time that the trust is established. Funds remaining in the trust at the beneficiary’s death must be 
used to reimburse Medicaid for services to that individual before such funds can be distributed to 
anyone else.
46
  
 
A third-party special needs trust is created with assets provided by a person other than the beneficiary, 
such as a parent, other relative, or friend of the beneficiary.
47
 The trust can be created and funded 
during the life of the originator (known as an “inter vivos” trust) or as part of a last will and testament 
(known as a “testamentary” trust). Upon the beneficiary’s death, there is no requirement to use residual 
funds to reimburse Medicaid for services provided to the individual, and “remainder” beneficiaries may 
be named to receive those assets.
48
 
 
Alternatively, a pooled trust is often a practical alternative for small estates or where a satisfactory 
trustee is difficult to establish. Sub-accounts belonging to many beneficiaries are managed as a single 
entity, usually by nonprofit corporations, which use the experience of social workers, money managers, 
and attorneys specializing is special needs cases. Because many financial institutions do not handle 
small special needs trusts, or charge fees that are not cost-effective for modest trusts, pooled trusts 
can give families access to highly skilled trustees. Funds remaining at the beneficiary’s death are 
typically divided between Medicaid and the nonprofit entity.
49
 
                                                
38
 S. 393.12(10), F.S.  
39
 Special Needs Alliance, Special Needs Trusts and Personal Injury Settlements (2023), https://www.specialneedsalliance.org/special-
needs-101/special-needs-trusts-and-personal-injury-settlements/ (last visited Mar. 1, 2023). 
40
 Special Needs Alliance, Special Needs Trusts and Personal Injury Settlements (2023) https://www.specialneedsalliance.org/special-
needs-101/special-needs-trusts-and-personal-injury-settlements/ (last visited Mar. 1, 2023). 
41
 Id. 
42
 42 U.S.C. s. 1396p(d)(4).  
43
 See 42 U.S.C. s. 1382c(a)(3). 
44
 Id. 
45
 Special Needs Alliance, Special Needs Trusts and Personal Injury Settlements. 
46
 Id. 
47
 Id. 
48
 Id. 
49
 Id.  STORAGE NAME: h0813c.CFS 	PAGE: 6 
DATE: 3/28/2023 
  
 
Similar to special needs trusts, pooled trusts must be established in a way that complies with federal 
law.
50
 Specifically, a pooled trust must: 
 Contain the assets of an individual of any age who has a disability that makes him or her 
substantially unable to work;
51
 
 Be established for the benefit of the individual; 
 Be established and managed by a nonprofit association; 
 Maintain a separate account for each beneficiary but pool the funds for investment and 
management purposes; 
 Be established by the parent, grandparent, or legal guardian of the individual, by the 
individual, or by a court; and 
 Reimburse the state for all of the medical assistance paid on behalf of the individual from any 
remaining assets upon the individual’s death to the extent the funds are not retained by the 
trust.
52
 
 
Effect of Proposed Changes 
 
The bill specifies that the legislative intent of the bill is to codify and clarify existing common law and 
Florida case law which recognizes that the parents of a dependent adult child (DAC) have an obligation 
to support that child after he or she turns 18. The bill specifies that it is the intent of the legislature to 
provide a framework of procedures by which a court must establish support for a DAC. The bill creates 
s. 61.1255, F.S., to codify the common law obligation of a parent to support a DAC after he or she 
reaches the age of majority. The bill defines the term “dependent adult child” to mean an unmarried 
adult who is incapable of self-support as a result of physical or mental incapacity that began before the 
person reached the age of 18. 
 
The bill specifies that any support for a DAC must be established in a civil proceeding filed in the circuit 
court within the county in which the DAC resides. The bill also identifies specific DAC support 
guidelines the court must consider and seeks to create a consistent method for handling such matters 
in courts throughout the state.  
 
Further, the bill specifies who may bring an action to establish support: the DAC, his or her agent under 
a durable power of attorney, the guardian or guardian advocate, or a parent or another person on 
behalf of the DAC. The bill also specifies that such support payments ordered after the DAC reaches 
the age of 18 should be made directly to the DAC and permits a portion of the support to be placed in a 
special needs trust or pooled trust for the DAC’s benefit.  
 
The bill specifies that an action to establish support for a DAC may be filed at any time after the DAC 
turns 17 years and 6 months. However, the action may be filed earlier if a court order for support was 
established prior to the DAC reaching the age of majority. Further, in a case where a court already has 
continuing jurisdiction over support from a child support case, the parties are permitted to extend 
support past the age of majority by written agreement. If the parties do not agree to extend support for 
the DAC, support must then be established in a separate support proceeding; it cannot be established 
under the continuing jurisdiction of the minor’s child support case. 
 
The bill prohibits the Department of Revenue from filing a petition to establish support for a DAC or to 
modify or enforce a support order for a DAC. The bill declares the scope of the bill is limited to support 
orders for DACs.  
 
The bill amends s. 61.29, F.S., to explicitly state that a court should not use the support guidelines for a 
minor child under s. 61.29, F.S.; instead, the bill creates s. 61.31, F.S., a more specific statute to direct 
courts how to calculate support for a DAC. In calculating support to be paid after a DAC reaches age 
18, a court must consider all of the following factors: 
                                                
50
 42 U.S.C. s. 1396p(d)(4)(C). 
51
 42 U.S.C. s. 1382c(a)(3). 
52
 Id.  STORAGE NAME: h0813c.CFS 	PAGE: 7 
DATE: 3/28/2023 
  
 The DAC’s income and assets.  
 Any existing or future needs of the DAC which are directly related to his or her mental or 
physical incapacity and the substantial care and personal supervision directly required by 
or related to that incapacity. 
 Whether a parent pays for or will pay for the care or supervision of the DAC or provides or 
will provide substantial care or personal supervision to the DAC. 
 The financial resources available to each parent for the support, care, and supervision of 
the DAC. 
 Any other financial resources or other resources or programs available for the support, 
care, and supervision of the DAC.  
 
The bill further requires a court to consider any state or federal programs or benefits that the DAC is 
currently receiving and the effect that ordering support would have on his or her continued eligibility for 
such programs. As such, the bill specifies that a court may assign a portion of the support payment to 
be placed in a special needs trust or a pooled trust established for the DAC. The bill prohibits a court 
from ordering support that will cause the DAC to be ineligible for programs he or she is currently 
participating in, or programs and services for which he or she is reasonably expected to become 
eligible to participate in after turning 18. 
 
The bill permits a petition to appoint a guardian advocate to include a request for the authority to bring 
civil action in circuit court to establish periodic payments from either or both parents of the dependent 
adult child for the support, care, maintenance, education, or other needs of the DAC. The bill also 
allows a guardian to petition the court for the authority bring a civil suit in circuit court to establish 
periodic payments from the parents of the DAC for the support, care, maintenance, education, and any 
other needs of the DAC if not otherwise provided for in the guardianship plan. Further, the bill requires 
the amount of support for the DAC to be determined pursuant to s. 61.31, F.S. 
 
Under the bill, any modifications and enforcement of child support, time-sharing, and support for a DAC 
must be made in accordance with the requirements established for regular child support under chapter 
61. The bill assigns jurisdiction over a DAC and defines the court’s role in such a proceeding. The bill 
further specifies that no obligation or duty is conferred on a guardian advocate or guardian to pursue 
support for the person with a developmental disability. 
 
The effective date of the bill is July 1, 2023.   
 
B. SECTION DIRECTORY: 
Section 1: Creates s. 61.1255, F.S., relating to support of dependent adult children.  
Section 2: Amends s. 61.13, F.S., relating to support of children. 
Section 3: Amends s. 61.29, F.S., relating to child support guidelines.  
Section 4: Amends s. 61.30, F.S., relating to child support guidelines.  
Section 5: Creates s. 61.31, F.S., relating to amount of support for a dependent adult child.  
Section 6: Amends s. 393.12, F.S., relating to appointment of a guardian advocate.  
Section 7: Amends s. 742.031, F.S., relating to hearings.  
Section 8: Amends s. 742.06, F.S., relating to jurisdiction retained for future orders. 
Section 9: Creates s. 744.422, F.S., relating to petition for support of a dependent adult child. 
Section 10: Provides an effective date of July 1, 2023. 
 
II.  FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT 
 
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures:  STORAGE NAME: h0813c.CFS 	PAGE: 8 
DATE: 3/28/2023 
  
None. However, the bill may increase the caseload for circuit courts. 
 
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
None. 
 
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR: 
The bill may have an impact on the private sector by creating a statutory obligation for a parent or 
parents to financially support their dependent adult child after he or she turns 18. This may create a 
significant financial burden on parents of DACs. However, the guidelines created in the bill take into 
account the parent or parents’ ability to pay financial support, which may limit the impact on low-income 
parents of DACs.  
 
D. FISCAL COMMENTS: 
None.  
III.  COMMENTS 
 
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES: 
 
 1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision: 
Not applicable. 
 
 2. Other: 
None. 
 
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY: 
Not applicable.  
 
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS: 
None. 
 
IV.  AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES 
On March 14, 2023, the Civil Justice Subcommittee adopted a proposed committee substitute (PCS) and 
reported the bill favorably as a committee substitute. The PCS differed from the original bill in that it: 
 Changed the title of the bill to Support for Dependent Adult Children. 
 Prohibited a court from ordering support that would cause the DAC to become ineligible for 
programs he or she participates in or would reasonably be expected to be eligible to participate in.  
 Clarified that the bill does not confer any obligation or duty for a guardian advocate or guardian to 
pursue support for the DAC or ward, respectively. 
 Authorized, rather than required, the court to order a father to pay attorney fees under certain 
circumstances in paternity cases. 
 
On March 27, 2023, the Children, Families, and Seniors Subcommittee adopted an amendment and 
reported the bill favorably as a committee substitute.  The amendment: 
 Makes technical changes to address procedural matters relating to support for dependent adult 
children.  STORAGE NAME: h0813c.CFS 	PAGE: 9 
DATE: 3/28/2023 
  
 Specifies that support for a dependent adult child must be established in a separate civil proceeding 
and not in a guardianship proceeding.  
 Allows a petition to appoint a guardian advocate to include a request for the authority to bring civil 
action in circuit court to establish periodic payments from the parents of the dependent adult child for 
the support, care, maintenance, education, or other needs of the child. 
 
This analysis is drafted to the committee substitute as passed by the Children Families, and Seniors 
Subcommittee.